Azizian Maryam, Ghasemi Darestani Nadia, Mohammadzadeh Boukani Linda, Ghahremanloo Kimia, Nourian Sayed Mohammad Amin
School of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman, Iran.
School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan, Iran.
Int J Burns Trauma. 2022 Apr 15;12(2):45-51. eCollection 2022.
Burns are still one of the most prevalent injuries in the world. Allograft is in high demand as a biological dressing for any superficial open wounds, not just burn victims. Skin allograft is the gold standard for treating burns in people who do not have enough skin to cover all of the injured areas of their bodies. Studies have shown that skin allografts are superior to topical antimicrobial dressings in partial thickness burns and can reduce complications and length of hospital stay in burn patients. However, to the best of our knowledge very few studies have investigated these results in our country. The aim of the current study is to evaluate and report the outcomes of skin allograft on burn patient survival in Iran.
This prospective clinical trial study was performed on patients admitted to the burn center of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Tehran between July 15, 2017 and April 27, 2021. The control group consisted of patients admitted to the burn ward who were not undergoing skin allografts. This group was matched with the case group in terms of sex, age, and percentage of burns. We compared the outcome of the study was the duration of hospitalization, and status of patients at discharge. The study protocol was approved by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) under the code of IRCT2016112431074N1 (https://fa.irct.ir/trial/24517).
Overall, 112 patients in the case group and 224 patients in the control group were studied. The length of hospital stay in the case group (41.13±11.7) was considerably longer than the control group (24.6±12.1) (P<0.001), but the mortality rate in the two groups was not statistically different (P=0.633). The average survival time of case group (53 days, 95% CI=45-56) was higher than the control group (49 days, 95% CI=39-58) (P=0.012). Number of allograft usage (OR=0.038, 95% CI=0.142-0.945) and also Age (OR=1.03, 95% CI=1.005-1.070) were predictors of death.
Although the use of skin allografts in large burns (more than 50%) reduced mortality in burn patients, their use in burns less than 50% has not been effective in reducing patient mortality. Due to the limited access to this valuable product, its use in burns less than 50% should be done with caution and, due to the limited access to skin allografts in most burn centers in Iran, patients with extensive burns (more than 50%) should be used as a priority.
烧伤仍是全球最常见的损伤之一。同种异体移植作为一种生物敷料,不仅适用于烧伤患者,对任何浅表开放性伤口都有很大需求。皮肤同种异体移植是治疗身体皮肤不足以覆盖所有受伤部位患者烧伤的金标准。研究表明,在浅二度烧伤中,皮肤同种异体移植优于局部抗菌敷料,可减少烧伤患者的并发症和住院时间。然而,据我们所知,我国很少有研究探讨这些结果。本研究的目的是评估并报告伊朗皮肤同种异体移植对烧伤患者生存的影响。
本前瞻性临床试验研究于2017年7月15日至2021年4月27日在德黑兰伊玛目霍梅尼医院烧伤中心收治的患者中进行。对照组由未接受皮肤同种异体移植的烧伤病房患者组成。该组在性别、年龄和烧伤百分比方面与病例组匹配。我们比较的研究结果是住院时间和出院时患者的状况。该研究方案已获得伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT)批准,注册号为IRCT2016112431074N1(https://fa.irct.ir/trial/24517)。
总体而言,病例组研究了112例患者,对照组研究了224例患者。病例组的住院时间(41.13±11.7)明显长于对照组(24.6±12.1)(P<0.001),但两组的死亡率无统计学差异(P=0.633)。病例组的平均生存时间(53天,95%CI=45-56)高于对照组(49天,95%CI=39-58)(P=0.012)。同种异体移植使用次数(OR=0.038,95%CI=0.142-0.945)和年龄(OR=1.03,95%CI=1.005-1.070)是死亡的预测因素。
尽管在大面积烧伤(超过50%)中使用皮肤同种异体移植可降低烧伤患者的死亡率,但在烧伤面积小于50%的患者中使用并不能有效降低患者死亡率。由于获取这种宝贵产品的机会有限,在烧伤面积小于50%的患者中使用时应谨慎,而且由于伊朗大多数烧伤中心获取皮肤同种异体移植的机会有限,大面积烧伤(超过50%)的患者应优先使用。