Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jan;139(1):49-52. doi: 10.1037/a0030521.
We greatly appreciate the astute comments on Lillard et al. (2013) and the opportunity to reply. Here we point out the importance of keeping conceptual distinctions clear regarding play, pretend play, and exploration. We also discuss methodological issues with play research. We end with speculation that if pretend play did not emerge because it was naturally selected (due to helping causal reasoning or some other developmentally important skill), perhaps it emerged as a by-product of 2 other selected behaviors: play fighting and language.
我们非常感谢对 Lillard 等人(2013 年)的敏锐评论,并借此机会进行回复。在这里,我们指出了在游戏、假装游戏和探索方面保持概念区分清晰的重要性。我们还讨论了游戏研究中的方法问题。最后我们推测,如果假装游戏没有因为自然选择而出现(由于帮助因果推理或其他一些发展重要技能),那么它可能是另外两种被选择的行为:玩耍和语言的副产品。