Humphreys B Kim, Peterson Cynthia
University of Zürich and Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Jan 7;21(1):3. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-3.
The symptom 'dizziness' is common in patients with chronic whiplash related disorders. However, little is known about dizziness in neck pain patients who have not suffered whiplash. Therefore, the purposes of this study are to compare baseline factors and clinical outcomes of neck pain patients with and without dizziness undergoing chiropractic treatment and to compare outcomes based on gender.
This prospective cohort study compares adult neck pain patients with dizziness (n = 177) to neck pain patients without dizziness (n = 228) who presented for chiropractic treatment, (no chiropractic or manual therapy in the previous 3 months). Patients completed the numerical pain rating scale (NRS) and Bournemouth questionnaire (BQN) at baseline. At 1, 3 and 6 months after start of treatment the NRS and BQN were completed along with the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. Demographic information was also collected. Improvement at each follow-up data collection point was categorized using the PGIC as 'improved' or 'not improved'. Differences between the two groups for NRS and BQN subscale and total scores were calculated using the unpaired Student's t-test. Gender differences between the patients with dizziness were also calculated using the unpaired t-test.
Females accounted for 75% of patients with dizziness. The majority of patients with and without dizziness reported clinically relevant improvement at 1, 3 and 6 months with 80% of patients with dizziness and 78% of patients without dizziness being improved at 6 months. Patients with dizziness reported significantly higher baseline NRS and BQN scores, but at 6 months there were no significant differences between patients with and without dizziness for any of the outcome measures. Females with dizziness reported higher levels of depression compared to males at 1, 3 and 6 months (p = 0.007, 0.005, 0.022).
Neck pain patients with dizziness reported significantly higher pain and disability scores at baseline compared to patients without dizziness. A high proportion of patients in both groups reported clinically relevant improvement on the PGIC scale. At 6 months after start of chiropractic treatment there were no differences in any outcome measures between the two groups.
“头晕”症状在慢性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者中很常见。然而,对于未遭受挥鞭样损伤的颈部疼痛患者的头晕情况知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是比较接受整脊治疗的有头晕和无头晕的颈部疼痛患者的基线因素和临床结局,并比较基于性别的结局。
这项前瞻性队列研究将有头晕的成年颈部疼痛患者(n = 177)与无头晕的颈部疼痛患者(n = 228)进行比较,这些患者前来接受整脊治疗(过去3个月内未接受过整脊或手法治疗)。患者在基线时完成数字疼痛评分量表(NRS)和伯恩茅斯问卷(BQN)。在治疗开始后的1、3和6个月,完成NRS、BQN以及患者整体改善印象(PGIC)量表。还收集了人口统计学信息。使用PGIC将每个随访数据收集点的改善情况分类为“改善”或“未改善”。使用非配对学生t检验计算两组在NRS和BQN子量表及总分上的差异。使用非配对t检验计算头晕患者之间的性别差异。
女性占头晕患者的75%。大多数有头晕和无头晕的患者在1、3和6个月时报告有临床相关改善,6个月时80%有头晕的患者和78%无头晕的患者得到改善。有头晕的患者报告的基线NRS和BQN评分显著更高,但在6个月时,有头晕和无头晕的患者在任何结局指标上均无显著差异。在1、3和6个月时,有头晕的女性比男性报告的抑郁水平更高(p = 0.007、0.005、0.022)。
与无头晕的患者相比,有头晕的颈部疼痛患者在基线时报告的疼痛和残疾评分显著更高。两组中很大比例的患者在PGIC量表上报告有临床相关改善。在整脊治疗开始6个月后,两组在任何结局指标上均无差异。