Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Dyslexia. 2013 Feb;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1002/dys.1447. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
This longitudinal study examined early cognitive risk and protective factors for Grade 2 reading disability (RD). We first examined the reading outcome of 198 children in four developmental cognitive subgroups that were identified in our previous analysis: dysfluent trajectory, declining trajectory, unexpected trajectory and typical trajectory. We found that RD was unevenly distributed among the subgroups, although children with RD were found in all subgroups. A majority of the children with RD had familial risk for dyslexia. Second, we examined in what respect children with similar early cognitive development but different RD outcome differ from each other in cognitive skills, task-focused behaviour and print exposure. The comparison of the groups with high cognitive risk but different RD outcome showed significant differences in phonological skills, in the amount of shared reading and in task-focused behaviour. Children who ended up with RD despite low early cognitive risk had poorer cognitive skills, more task avoidance and they were reading less than children without RD and low cognitive risk. In summary, lack of task avoidance seemed to act as a protective factor, which underlines the importance of keeping children interested in school work and reading.
本纵向研究考察了二年级阅读障碍(RD)的早期认知风险和保护因素。我们首先考察了我们之前分析中确定的四个发展认知亚组中 198 名儿童的阅读结果:不流畅轨迹、下降轨迹、意外轨迹和典型轨迹。我们发现,RD 在亚组之间的分布不均匀,尽管在所有亚组中都发现了 RD 儿童。大多数 RD 儿童有阅读障碍的家族风险。其次,我们研究了具有相似早期认知发展但 RD 结果不同的儿童在认知技能、任务导向行为和印刷品暴露方面有何不同。具有高认知风险但 RD 结果不同的组之间的比较显示,在语音技能、共享阅读量和任务导向行为方面存在显著差异。尽管认知风险较低,但最终仍出现 RD 的儿童认知技能较差,任务回避更多,并且阅读量少于没有 RD 和低认知风险的儿童。总之,缺乏任务回避似乎是一种保护因素,这强调了让孩子对学校工作和阅读保持兴趣的重要性。