Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
J Surg Res. 2013 Jul;183(1):462-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increasingly viewed as a quality of care metric, although risk-adjusted incident rates of postoperative VTE and VTE after hospital discharge (VTEDC) are not available. We sought to characterize the predictors of VTE and VTEDC to develop nomograms to estimate individual risk of VTE and VTEDC.
Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we identified 471,867 patients who underwent inpatient abdominal or thoracic operations between 2005 and 2010. We excluded primary vascular and spine operations. We built logistic regression models using stepwise model selection and constructed nomograms for VTE and VTEDC with statistically significant covariates.
The overall, unadjusted, 30-d incidence of VTE and VTEDC was 1.5% and 0.5%, respectively. Annual incidence rates remained unchanged over the study period. On multivariate analysis, age, body mass index, presence of preoperative infection, operation for cancer, procedure type (spleen highest), multivisceral resection, and non-bariatric laparoscopic surgery were significant predictors for VTE and VTEDC. Other significant predictors for VTE, but not VTEDC, included a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, disseminated cancer, and emergent operation. We constructed and validated nomograms by bootstrapping. The concordance indices for VTE and VTEDC were 0.77 and 0.67, respectively.
Substantial variation exists in the incidence of VTE and VTEDC, depending on patient and procedural factors. We constructed nomograms to predict individual risk of 30-d VTE and VTEDC. These may allow more targeted quality improvement interventions to reduce VTE and VTEDC in high-risk general and thoracic surgery patients.
术后静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)越来越被视为医疗质量的衡量标准,尽管术后 VTE 和出院后 VTE(VTEDC)的风险调整发生率尚不可用。我们旨在描述 VTE 和 VTEDC 的预测因素,以开发列线图来估计个体 VTE 和 VTEDC 的风险。
我们使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库,确定了 2005 年至 2010 年间接受住院腹部或胸部手术的 471867 例患者。我们排除了原发性血管和脊柱手术。我们使用逐步模型选择建立逻辑回归模型,并构建了具有统计学意义的协变量的 VTE 和 VTEDC 的列线图。
总体而言,未经调整的 30 天 VTE 和 VTEDC 的发生率分别为 1.5%和 0.5%。在研究期间,年发生率保持不变。多变量分析显示,年龄、体重指数、术前感染、癌症手术、手术类型(脾脏最高)、多脏器切除和非减肥腹腔镜手术是 VTE 和 VTEDC 的重要预测因素。其他 VTE 的重要预测因素,但不是 VTEDC 的预测因素,包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病、转移性癌症和急诊手术的病史。我们通过自举法构建和验证了列线图。VTE 和 VTEDC 的一致性指数分别为 0.77 和 0.67。
VTE 和 VTEDC 的发生率存在很大差异,取决于患者和手术因素。我们构建了列线图来预测个体 30 天 VTE 和 VTEDC 的风险。这可能允许更有针对性的质量改进干预措施,以降低高危普通和胸外科患者的 VTE 和 VTEDC 发生率。