• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱镍钛诺支架治疗股浅动脉和膝上腘动脉(Zilver PTX 单臂临床研究):糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的比较。

drug-eluting nitinol stent treatment of the superficial femoral artery and above-the-knee popliteal artery (the Zilver PTX single-arm clinical study): a comparison between diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

机构信息

Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 324 Viale Regina Elena, 00161, Rome, Italy,

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Oct;36(5):1232-40. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0543-5. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00270-012-0543-5
PMID:23299704
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the 1-year results of drug-eluting nitinol stent placement in the femoropopliteal artery of diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients enrolled in this prospective, multicenter study underwent paclitaxel-eluting stent placement for de novo or restenotic lesions of the superficial femoral and/or popliteal artery. Baseline and follow-up walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ) scores, Rutherford classifications, and ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were obtained. Follow-up was completed at 1, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

There were 285 diabetic patients and 502 nondiabetic patients treated. There were no significant differences in mean lesion length or lesion calcification between patient groups. Procedural success in both treatment groups was >97 %. There were no significant differences between diabetic and nondiabetic groups in Kaplan-Meier estimates of patency, event-free survival (EFS), or freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 and 12 months. Both groups experienced a significant increase in ABI and WIQ values after treatment, and these improvements were sustained to 12-month follow-up; however, nondiabetic patients had significantly greater 6- and 12-month WIQ scores compared with diabetic patients. Based on covariate analysis, the only factors shown to be significant and to negatively influence patency were longer lesion length (p = 0.009), higher Rutherford classification (p = 0.02), and lack of hypertension (p = 0.02); diabetic status was not found to be a significant factor.

CONCLUSION

Diabetic and nondiabetic patients had similar estimates of primary patency, EFS, and freedom from TLR; however, diabetic patients showed less improvement in WIQ scores compared with nondiabetic patients.

摘要

目的

描述药物洗脱镍钛诺支架在糖尿病和非糖尿病患者股腘动脉中的 1 年结果。

材料和方法

所有纳入本前瞻性、多中心研究的患者均因股浅动脉和/或腘动脉的初发或再狭窄病变而行紫杉醇洗脱支架置入术。在基线和随访时均进行步行障碍问卷(WIQ)评分、Rutherford 分级和踝肱指数(ABI)测量。随访在 1、6 和 12 个月完成。

结果

共治疗 285 例糖尿病患者和 502 例非糖尿病患者。两组患者的平均病变长度或病变钙化程度均无显著差异。两组患者的手术成功率均>97%。两组患者的通畅率、无事件生存率(EFS)或免于靶病变血运重建(TLR)的Kaplan-Meier 估计值在 6 个月和 12 个月时均无显著差异。两组患者的 ABI 和 WIQ 值在治疗后均显著升高,且这种改善持续到 12 个月随访;然而,与糖尿病患者相比,非糖尿病患者在 6 个月和 12 个月时的 WIQ 评分显著更高。基于协变量分析,唯一显示与通畅率显著负相关的因素是病变长度较长(p=0.009)、Rutherford 分级较高(p=0.02)和无高血压(p=0.02);而糖尿病状态并非显著因素。

结论

糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的主要通畅率、EFS 和免于 TLR 的估计值相似;然而,与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者的 WIQ 评分改善程度较低。

相似文献

1
drug-eluting nitinol stent treatment of the superficial femoral artery and above-the-knee popliteal artery (the Zilver PTX single-arm clinical study): a comparison between diabetic and nondiabetic patients.药物洗脱镍钛诺支架治疗股浅动脉和膝上腘动脉(Zilver PTX 单臂临床研究):糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的比较。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Oct;36(5):1232-40. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0543-5. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
2
Nitinol stents with polymer-free paclitaxel coating for lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries above the knee: twelve-month safety and effectiveness results from the Zilver PTX single-arm clinical study.载紫杉醇聚合物涂层的镍钛合金支架治疗膝上股浅动脉和腘动脉病变:Zilver PTX 单臂临床研究的 12 个月安全性和有效性结果。
J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Oct;18(5):613-23. doi: 10.1583/11-3560.1.
3
The Zilver® PTX® Single Arm Study: 12-month results from the TASC C/D lesion subgroup.Zilver® PTX® 单臂研究:TASC C/D 病变亚组的 12 个月结果。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2013 Feb;54(1):115-22.
4
Treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis with paclitaxel-eluting stents.紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗股腘动脉支架内再狭窄。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Mar;6(3):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.12.118.
5
Randomized comparison of ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft vs prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.ePTFE/镍钛诺自膨式覆膜支架与人工股腘动脉旁路移植术治疗股浅动脉闭塞性疾病的随机对照研究
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):109-15, 116.e1-9; discussion 116. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.041. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
6
PEACE I all-comers registry: patency evaluation after implantation of the 4-French Pulsar-18 self-expanding nitinol stent in femoropopliteal lesions.PEACE I 所有受试者注册研究:4 法国规格的 Pulsar-18 自膨式镍钛合金支架植入股腘动脉病变后的通畅性评估
J Endovasc Ther. 2014 Jun;21(3):373-80. doi: 10.1583/13-4637R.1.
7
Heparin-bonded covered stents versus bare-metal stents for complex femoropopliteal artery lesions: the randomized VIASTAR trial (Viabahn endoprosthesis with PROPATEN bioactive surface [VIA] versus bare nitinol stent in the treatment of long lesions in superficial femoral artery occlusive disease).肝素结合涂层支架与裸金属支架治疗复杂股腘动脉病变的随机对照试验(Viabahn 覆膜支架联合 PROPATEN 生物活性表面[VIA]与裸钽支架治疗股浅动脉闭塞性疾病长段病变的疗效比较[VIASTAR 试验])。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 8;62(15):1320-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.079. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
8
The United States StuDy for EvalUating EndovasculaR TreAtments of Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal By usIng the Protégé EverfLex NitInol STent SYstem II (DURABILITY II).美国评估使用 Protégé Everflex Nitinol STent System II(耐久性 II)治疗股浅动脉和腘动脉近端病变的研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):73-83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.066. Epub 2013 May 2.
9
Four-year randomized prospective comparison of percutaneous ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft versus prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.经皮 ePTFE/镍钛诺自膨式支架移植物与人工股腘旁路术治疗股浅动脉闭塞性疾病的 4 年随机前瞻性比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):584-90; discussion 590-1, 591.e1-591.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.071.
10
Prediction Model for Freedom from TLR from a Multi-study Analysis of Long-Term Results with the Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Peripheral Stent.基于Zilver PTX药物洗脱外周支架长期结果多研究分析的无靶病变血运重建预测模型
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Feb;44(2):196-206. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02648-6. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Mortality and Factors Affecting Outcome of Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Stents and Bare Metal Stents in Femoropopliteal PAD.评估紫杉醇涂层支架和裸金属支架在股腘动脉外周动脉疾病中的死亡率及影响预后的因素。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 13;9(7):2221. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072221.
2
Long term outcomes in diabetic patients treated with atherectomy for peripheral artery disease.经腔内斑块旋切术治疗外周动脉疾病的糖尿病患者的长期结果。
Cardiol J. 2020;27(5):600-607. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0122. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
3
Real-World Comparison of Drug-Eluting and Bare-Metal Stents in Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease with Trans-Atlantic Intersociety Consensus B Lesions: A 2-Year, Single-Institute Study.
药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗伴有跨大西洋协作组共识B型病变的股浅动脉闭塞性疾病的真实世界比较:一项为期2年的单机构研究
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2018 Mar;34(2):130-136. doi: 10.6515/ACS.201803_34(2).20171126A.
4
Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Health Technology Assessment.外周动脉疾病中的紫杉醇药物洗脱支架:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2015 Nov 1;15(20):1-62. eCollection 2015.
5
Superficial Femoral Artery Intervention: Creating an Algorithmic Approach for the Use of Old and Novel (Endovascular) Technologies.股浅动脉介入治疗:为旧有及新型(血管内)技术的应用创建一种算法式方法。
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Sep;17(9):400. doi: 10.1007/s11936-015-0400-3.