• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[XELOX与FOLFOX-4化疗方案用于结直肠癌的成本分析]

[Cost analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy regimens for colorectal carcinoma].

作者信息

Büchler T, Nohejlová Medková A, Kupec M, Bláha M, Pavlík T, Dušek L, Abrahámová J

机构信息

Onkologicka klinika1. LF UK a Thomayerovy nemocnice, Praha.

出版信息

Klin Onkol. 2012;25(6):440-4.

PMID:23301646
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to compare healthcare-related costs of treatment with XELOX and FOLFOX4 chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with colorectal cancer. We have evaluated costs claimed to the health insurance by the hospital administering these cancer therapies. This study is a pilot project utilising the new I-COP database developed by the Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses of the Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

First, we estimated the costs based on current prices of procedures, medication, and materials from public sources. Using the I-COP database, we then carried out a matched-pair comparison of 26 patients treated with FOLFOX4 or XELOX for colorectal cancer. We evaluated a period of three months of therapy (i.e. 6 cycles of FOLFOX4 or 4 cycles of XELOX). Statistical analysis was done using the Wilcoxon matched pairs test.

RESULTS

The estimated cost for three months of therapy was 148,288 Czech crowns (CZK) for FOLFOX4 (including CZK 101,064 for chemotherapy drugs) and CZK 123,756 for XELOX. The overall costs claimed to the insurance companies were CZK 160,158 and CZK 151,176 for FOLFOX4 and XELOX, respectively (p = 0.221). The XELOX regimen had significantly higher costs for chemotherapy drugs (CZK 131,705 versus 114,531, p = 0.023) whereas other costs were lower than those for FOLFOX4.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFOX4 and XELOX regimens can be considered as equivalent in terms of costs claimed by the hospital administering cancer treatment.

摘要

背景

我们研究的目的是比较结直肠癌患者接受XELOX和FOLFOX4化疗方案的医疗相关费用。我们评估了实施这些癌症治疗的医院向健康保险申报的费用。本研究是一个试点项目,利用了捷克共和国布尔诺马萨里克大学的生物统计学与分析研究所开发的新I-COP数据库。

患者与方法

首先,我们根据公共来源的手术、药物和材料的当前价格估算费用。然后,利用I-COP数据库,我们对26例接受FOLFOX4或XELOX治疗的结直肠癌患者进行了配对比较。我们评估了三个月的治疗期(即FOLFOX4的6个周期或XELOX的4个周期)。使用Wilcoxon配对检验进行统计分析。

结果

FOLFOX4三个月治疗期的估算费用为148,288捷克克朗(CZK)(包括化疗药物101,064捷克克朗),XELOX为123,756捷克克朗。向保险公司申报的总费用中,FOLFOX4为160,158捷克克朗,XELOX为151,176捷克克朗(p = 0.221)。XELOX方案的化疗药物费用显著更高(131,705捷克克朗对114,531捷克克朗,p = 0.023),而其他费用低于FOLFOX4。

结论

就实施癌症治疗的医院申报的费用而言,FOLFOX4和XELOX方案可被视为等效。

相似文献

1
[Cost analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy regimens for colorectal carcinoma].[XELOX与FOLFOX-4化疗方案用于结直肠癌的成本分析]
Klin Onkol. 2012;25(6):440-4.
2
Cost-minimisation analysis in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in France: XELOX versus FOLFOX-6.法国转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中的成本最小化分析:XELOX 与 FOLFOX-6。
Oncology. 2010;79(3-4):174-80. doi: 10.1159/000325999. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
3
Cost-analysis of XELOX and FOLFOX4 for treatment of colorectal cancer to assist decision-making on reimbursement.XELOX 和 FOLFOX4 治疗结直肠癌的成本分析,以协助报销决策。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jul 9;11:288. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-288.
4
Cost analysis of adjuvant therapy with XELOX or FOLFOX4 for colon cancer.XELOX 或 FOLFOX4 辅助治疗结肠癌的成本分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):958-62. doi: 10.1111/codi.12216.
5
Pharmaco-economic analysis of direct medical costs of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy with XELOX or modified FOLFOX-6 regimens: implications for health-care utilization in Australia.采用XELOX或改良FOLFOX - 6方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的直接医疗成本的药物经济学分析:对澳大利亚医疗保健利用的影响
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep;9(3):239-48. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12044. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colon cancer treatments from MOSIAC and No. 16968 trials.来自MOSIAC和16968号试验的结肠癌治疗的成本效益分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 21;20(47):17976-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17976.
7
Economic impact of simplified de Gramont regimen in first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.简化的德·格拉蒙方案在转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中的经济影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Jun;7(2):107-13. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0338-1.
8
Cost identification of Nordic FLIRI, Nordic FLOX, XELIRI and XELOX in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in Sweden -- a clinical practice model approach.在瑞典,针对转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中北欧 FLIRI、北欧 FLOX、XELIRI 和 XELOX 的成本识别——一种临床实践模型方法。
Acta Oncol. 2012 Sep;51(7):840-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.713507. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
9
Cost-minimization analysis of sequence changes between FOLFIRI and FOLFOX6 therapy for advanced colorectal cancer in Japan.日本晚期结直肠癌 FOLFIRI 与 FOLFOX6 治疗方案中序列变化的成本最小化分析。
Clin Ther. 2009;31 Pt 2:2433-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.014.
10
XELOX vs FOLFOX-4 as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: NO16966 updated results.XELOX 对比 FOLFOX-4 一线治疗转移性结直肠癌:NO16966 更新结果。
Br J Cancer. 2011 Jun 28;105(1):58-64. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.201. Epub 2011 Jun 14.