Department of Research, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Drobak, Norway.
Transfusion. 2013 Jan;53 Suppl 1:48S-51S. doi: 10.1111/trf.12035.
Increased focus on traumatic coagulopathy over the last decade has led to more aggressive use of hemostatic agents in resuscitation of the massively bleeding patient. Novel formulations of plasma factors and other therapeutics have opened for early intervention to prevent coagulopathy and may even be utilized in the prehospital setting. Careful selection of patients to receive hemostatic agents early during the resuscitation is of great importance due to the potential detrimental effects of this treatment. Several studies have identified coagulation parameters as reliable predictors of massive transfusion, even very early after trauma. Prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT/INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen concentration, and viscoelastic tests such as thrombelastography (TEG) and rotational thrombelastometry (RoTEM) have proved to be of value in predicting massive transfusion when performed in-hospital. PT/INR appears to be slightly more accurate than the other parameters, with a reported sensitivity of 84.8% and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.87. Comparison studies on PT/INR, aPTT, and viscoelastic assays do suggest that caution should be taken when point-of-care (POC) methods, as opposed to conventional laboratory analyses, are used. Novel techniques for POC measurement of fibrinogen levels are currently being developed, and preclinical data suggest acceptable agreement with conventional methods. A number of factors should be considered regarding the feasibility of POC tests in the prehospital environment. In addition to environmental factors such as temperature, altitude, and humidity, electromagnetic interference issues and operators' skills must be taken into account. Coagulation parameters appear to be a useful tool in identifying patients with increased risk of massive bleeding at an early stage. Further studies are needed to determine if prehospital intervention based on POC analyses improves outcome.
在过去十年中,人们越来越关注创伤性凝血病,这导致在大量出血患者的复苏中更积极地使用止血剂。新型血浆因子和其他治疗方法的配方为早期干预以预防凝血病开辟了道路,甚至可以在院前环境中使用。由于这种治疗的潜在有害影响,因此在复苏过程中尽早仔细选择接受止血剂的患者非常重要。几项研究已经确定凝血参数是大量输血的可靠预测指标,甚至在创伤后非常早期也是如此。国际标准化比值(PT/INR)、部分活化凝血活酶时间(aPTT)、纤维蛋白原浓度以及血栓弹性图(TEG)和旋转血栓弹性测定法(RoTEM)等粘弹性试验已被证明在住院时预测大量输血具有价值。PT/INR 似乎比其他参数略为准确,其报道的灵敏度为 84.8%,接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.87。关于 PT/INR、aPTT 和粘弹性测定的比较研究表明,当使用床边即时(POC)方法而非常规实验室分析时,应谨慎使用。目前正在开发用于即时测量纤维蛋白原水平的新型 POC 技术,临床前数据表明与常规方法具有可接受的一致性。关于在院前环境中进行 POC 测试的可行性,需要考虑许多因素。除了温度、海拔和湿度等环境因素外,还必须考虑电磁干扰问题和操作人员的技能。凝血参数似乎是一种有用的工具,可在早期识别出大量出血风险增加的患者。需要进一步研究确定基于 POC 分析的院前干预是否可以改善结果。