Durham Epidemiologic Research and Information Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Environ Health. 2013 Jan 9;12:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-4.
Over the past two decades, 12 large epidemiologic studies and 2 registries have focused on U.S. veterans of the 1990-1991 Gulf War Era. We conducted a review of these studies' research tools to identify existing gaps and overlaps of efforts to date, and to advance development of the next generation of Gulf War Era survey tools. Overall, we found that many of the studies used similar instruments. Questions regarding exposures were more similar across studies than other domains, while neurocognitive and psychological tools were the most variable. Many studies focused on self-reported survey results, with a range of validation practices. However, physical exams, biomedical assessments, and specimen storage were not common. This review suggests that while research may be able to pool data from past surveys, future surveys need to consider how their design can yield data comparable with previous surveys. Additionally, data that incorporate recent technologies in specimen and genetic analyses would greatly enhance such survey data. When combined with existing data on deployment-related exposures and post-deployment health conditions, longitudinal follow-up of existing studies within this collaborative framework could represent an important step toward improving the health of veterans.
在过去的二十年中,有 12 项大型流行病学研究和 2 项登记处专注于研究 1990-1991 年海湾战争时期的美国退伍军人。我们对这些研究的研究工具进行了审查,以确定迄今为止努力的现有差距和重叠,并推进下一代海湾战争时期调查工具的发展。总的来说,我们发现许多研究使用了类似的工具。研究之间关于暴露的问题比其他领域更相似,而神经认知和心理工具则最具变异性。许多研究侧重于自我报告的调查结果,同时采用了一系列验证实践。然而,身体检查、生物医学评估和标本储存并不常见。这项审查表明,尽管研究可能能够从过去的调查中汇总数据,但未来的调查需要考虑如何设计才能产生与以前调查可比的数据。此外,纳入标本和基因分析新技术的数据将极大地增强这类调查数据。当与关于部署相关的暴露和部署后健康状况的现有数据相结合时,在这个协作框架内对现有研究进行纵向随访可能是改善退伍军人健康的重要一步。