Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Anesth Analg. 2013 Feb;116(2):312-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318275e8c7. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
The aim of our study was to use a quantitative measure of muscle strength to identify the muscle power at which the patient can safely ambulate unassisted after spinal anesthesia.
Twenty ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing elective perineal or lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in the study. Spinal anesthesia was conducted using 10 mg heavy bupivacaine. The regression of motor block was assessed both qualitatively using the Bromage score and quantitatively by measuring the isometric contraction of the knee, hip, and ankle flexors every 15 minutes until the patient was able to ambulate unassisted.
The rate of regression of the Bromage score was faster than regression of the isometric forces at all tested joints. As the median Bromage score reached 0 (no motor blockade), the mean±SD motor power recoveries at the knee, hip, and ankle were 28.2%±16%, 45.5%±24%, and 56.3%±28 %, respectively, and only 6 of 20 patients (30%, 95% confidence interval 10%-53%) were able to walk unassisted. After 75 minutes passed, 90% of the patients (95% confidence interval 56%-99%) were able to walk unassisted with mean motor power recovery of 63.6%±20%, 82.1%±27%, and 90.2%±24% at the knee, hip, and ankle, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was significantly higher with isometric contraction at different joints than the Bromage score (P<0.001). In addition, isometric contraction at different joints was effective in predicting the patients' ability to walk unassisted after subarachnoid block with prediction probabilities of 0.901, 0.948, and 0.958 for the knee, hip, and ankle, respectively, as compared with 0.752 for the Bromage score (P<0.001).
Quantitative measurement of the degree of recovery of the motor power of the knee, hip, or ankle flexors is more accurate and superior to the qualitative Bromage score, as a predictor of the patient's ability to safely ambulate after spinal anesthesia. This may be recommended when assessing motor block when small-dose anesthetic solutions are used.
本研究旨在使用肌肉力量的定量测量来确定患者在脊髓麻醉后能够安全地独立行走的肌肉力量。
我们招募了 20 名接受脊髓麻醉下会阴或下腹部手术的 ASA 身体状况 I 和 II 级患者。脊髓麻醉采用 10mg 重布比卡因进行。使用 Bromage 评分定性评估运动阻滞的消退,并每隔 15 分钟测量一次膝关节、髋关节和踝关节屈肌的等长收缩,直到患者能够独立行走。
Bromage 评分的消退速度快于所有测试关节的等力消退速度。当 Bromage 评分中位数达到 0(无运动阻滞)时,膝关节、髋关节和踝关节的平均±SD 运动力量恢复分别为 28.2%±16%、45.5%±24%和 56.3%±28%,只有 20 名患者中的 6 名(30%,95%置信区间 10%-53%)能够独立行走。75 分钟后,90%的患者(95%置信区间 56%-99%)能够独立行走,平均运动力量恢复分别为 63.6%±20%、82.1%±27%和 90.2%±24%在膝关节、髋关节和踝关节。不同关节的等长收缩的曲线下面积明显高于 Bromage 评分(P<0.001)。此外,不同关节的等长收缩在预测蛛网膜下腔阻滞后患者独立行走的能力方面具有较高的预测价值,预测概率分别为 0.901、0.948 和 0.958,而 Bromage 评分为 0.752(P<0.001)。
膝关节、髋关节或踝关节屈肌运动力量恢复程度的定量测量比定性 Bromage 评分更准确、更优越,是预测患者在脊髓麻醉后安全行走能力的指标。当使用小剂量麻醉剂溶液评估运动阻滞时,建议使用该方法。