Suppr超能文献

筛查性与症状性乳腺癌的分子特征及其对生存的影响:一项临床系列研究结果。

Molecular profiles of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancer and their impact on survival: results from a clinical series.

机构信息

Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Institute G, Pascale Foundation, Via Mariano Semmola, Naples 80131, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2013 Jan 10;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stage shift is widely considered a major determinant of the survival benefit conferred by breast cancer screening. However, factors and mechanisms underlying such a prognostic advantage need further clarification. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of screen detected vs. symptomatic breast cancers and assess whether differences in tumour biology might translate into survival benefit.

METHODS

In a clinical series of 448 women with operable breast cancer, the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were used to estimate the likelihood of cancer recurrence and death. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for the multivariate analyses including mode of detection, age at diagnosis, tumour size, and lymph node status. These same models were applied to subgroups defined by molecular subtypes.

RESULTS

Screen detected breast cancers tended to show more favourable clinicopathological features and survival outcomes compared to symptomatic cancers. The luminal A subtype was more common in women with mammography detected tumours than in symptomatic patients (68.5 vs. 59.0%, p=0.04). Data analysis across categories of molecular subtypes revealed significantly longer disease free and overall survival for screen detected cancers with a luminal A subtype only (p=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). For women with a luminal A subtype, the independent prognostic role of mode of detection on recurrence was confirmed in Cox proportional hazard models (p=0.03). An independent role of modality of detection on survival was also suggested (p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular subtypes did not substantially explain the differences in survival outcomes between screened and symptomatic patients. However, our results suggest that molecular profiles might play a role in interpreting such differences at least partially.Further studies are warranted to reinterpret the efficacy of screening programmes in the light of tumour biology.

摘要

背景

阶段转移被广泛认为是乳腺癌筛查带来生存获益的主要决定因素。然而,这种预后优势的背后的因素和机制仍需进一步阐明。我们试图比较筛查发现的乳腺癌和症状性乳腺癌的分子特征,并评估肿瘤生物学的差异是否能转化为生存获益。

方法

在一个 448 名可手术治疗的乳腺癌患者的临床系列中,使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验来估计癌症复发和死亡的可能性。Cox 比例风险模型用于包括检测方式、诊断时的年龄、肿瘤大小和淋巴结状态的多变量分析。这些相同的模型也适用于基于分子亚型定义的亚组。

结果

与症状性癌症相比,筛查发现的乳腺癌往往表现出更有利的临床病理特征和生存结局。在通过乳房 X 线照相术发现的肿瘤中, luminal A 亚型比症状性患者更为常见(68.5% vs. 59.0%,p=0.04)。对分子亚型各分类的数据分析显示,只有 luminal A 亚型的筛查发现的癌症具有显著更长的无病生存和总生存(p=0.01 和 0.02,分别)。对于 luminal A 亚型的女性,在 Cox 比例风险模型中,检测方式对复发的独立预后作用得到了证实(p=0.03)。检测方式对生存的独立作用也得到了提示(p=0.05)。

结论

分子亚型并不能充分解释筛查和症状性患者之间生存结局的差异。然而,我们的结果表明,分子谱可能至少部分地在解释这些差异方面发挥作用。需要进一步的研究来根据肿瘤生物学重新解释筛查计划的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1e/3598199/e8136915c3d2/1471-2407-13-15-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验