• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释筛查性乳腺癌和症状性乳腺癌预后差异。

Explaining the difference in prognosis between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.

机构信息

CR-UK Centre for Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, Charterhouse Square, London WC1M 6BQ, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2011 May 24;104(11):1680-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.144. Epub 2011 May 3.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2011.144
PMID:21540862
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3111158/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We analysed 10-year survival data in 19,411 women aged 50-64 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the West Midlands region of the United Kingdom. The aim was to estimate the survival advantage seen in cases that were screen detected compared with those diagnosed symptomatically and attribute this to shifts in prognostic variables or survival differences specific to prognostic categories.

METHODS

We studied tumour size, histological grade and the Nottingham Prognostic Index in very narrow categories and investigated the distribution of these prognostic factors within screen-detected and symptomatic tumours. We also adjusted for lead time bias.

RESULTS

The unadjusted 10-year breast cancer survival in screen-detected cases was 85.5% and in symptomatic cases 62.8%; after adjustment for lead time bias, survival in the screen-detected cases was 79.3%. Within narrow categories of prognostic variables, survival differences were small, indicating that the majority of the survival advantage of screen detection is due to differences in the distributions of size and node status.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested that a combination of lead time with size and node status in 10 categories explained almost all (97%) of the survival advantage. Only a small proportion remained to be explained by biological differences, manifested as length bias or overdiagnosis.

摘要

背景

我们分析了英国西米德兰兹地区 19411 名年龄在 50-64 岁之间被诊断患有浸润性乳腺癌的女性的 10 年生存数据。目的是估计筛查发现的病例与症状性诊断的病例之间的生存优势,并将其归因于预后变量的变化或特定于预后类别的生存差异。

方法

我们研究了非常狭窄类别的肿瘤大小、组织学分级和诺丁汉预后指数,并调查了这些预后因素在筛查发现和症状性肿瘤中的分布。我们还调整了领先时间偏倚。

结果

未经调整的筛查发现病例的 10 年乳腺癌生存率为 85.5%,症状性病例为 62.8%;调整领先时间偏倚后,筛查发现病例的生存率为 79.3%。在预后变量的狭窄类别中,生存差异较小,表明筛查发现的生存优势主要归因于大小和淋巴结状态分布的差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,领先时间与 10 个类别的大小和淋巴结状态相结合,几乎可以解释(97%)全部生存优势。只有一小部分可以用生物学差异来解释,表现为长度偏差或过度诊断。

相似文献

1
Explaining the difference in prognosis between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.解释筛查性乳腺癌和症状性乳腺癌预后差异。
Br J Cancer. 2011 May 24;104(11):1680-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.144. Epub 2011 May 3.
2
Using tumor phenotype, histological tumor distribution, and mammographic appearance to explain the survival differences between screen-detected and clinically detected breast cancers.利用肿瘤表型、组织学肿瘤分布和乳房X线摄影表现来解释筛查发现和临床发现的乳腺癌之间的生存差异。
APMIS. 2014 Aug;122(8):699-707. doi: 10.1111/apm.12294.
3
Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone?筛查发现的乳腺癌与有症状的乳腺癌:生存改善仅归因于分期迁移吗?
Br J Cancer. 2008 Jun 3;98(11):1741-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604368. Epub 2008 May 27.
4
Are international differences in breast cancer survival between Australia and the UK present amongst both screen-detected women and non-screen-detected women? survival estimates for women diagnosed in West Midlands and New South Wales 1997-2006.澳大利亚和英国在乳腺癌生存率方面的国际差异在经筛查发现的女性和未经筛查发现的女性中都存在吗?1997年至2006年在西米德兰兹郡和新南威尔士州诊断出的女性的生存估计。
Int J Cancer. 2016 May 15;138(10):2404-14. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29984. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
5
Independent prognostic value of screen detection in invasive breast cancer.浸润性乳腺癌中筛检的独立预后价值。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Apr 6;103(7):585-97. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr043. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
6
Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials.检测方法在预测乳腺癌生存率中的作用:随机筛查试验分析
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Aug 17;97(16):1195-203. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji239.
7
Mode of detection: an independent prognostic factor for women with breast cancer.检测方式:乳腺癌女性患者的一个独立预后因素。
J Med Screen. 2016 Jun;23(2):89-97. doi: 10.1177/0969141315604006. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Population estimates of survival in women with screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer taking account of lead time and length bias.考虑到提前期和长度偏倚,对筛查发现的和有症状的乳腺癌女性的生存情况进行人群估计。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(1):179-85. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0100-8. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
9
Is the presence of mammographic comedo calcification really a prognostic factor for small screen-detected invasive breast cancers?乳腺钼靶检查发现的粉刺样钙化的存在真的是小的筛查发现的浸润性乳腺癌的一个预后因素吗?
Clin Radiol. 2003 Jan;58(1):54-62. doi: 10.1053/crad.2002.1110.
10
Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods.通过乳腺 X 线筛查或其他方法检出的乳腺癌的长期预后。
Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):R134. doi: 10.1186/bcr3080. Epub 2011 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-Selection Bias in Randomized and Observational Studies on Screening Mammography: A Quantitative Assessment.乳腺钼靶筛查随机和观察性研究中的自我选择偏倚:定量评估
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 1;17:441-450. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S515464. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient counseling for breast cancer screening: Taking changes to USPSTF recommendations into account.乳腺癌筛查的患者咨询:考虑美国预防服务工作组建议的变化
OBG Manag. 2023 Dec;35(12):43-49. doi: 10.12788/obgm.0334.
3
Lead-Time Corrected Effect on Breast Cancer Survival in Germany by Mode of Detection.德国乳腺癌生存的提前期校正检测方式效应
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 28;16(7):1326. doi: 10.3390/cancers16071326.
4
Breast Cancer Detection Using a Low-Dose Positron Emission Digital Mammography System.使用低剂量正电子发射数字乳腺摄影系统进行乳腺癌检测。
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Mar;6(2):e230020. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230020.
5
Isolating the effect of confounding from the observed survival benefit of screening participants - a methodological approach illustrated by data from the German mammography screening programme.从筛查参与者观察到的生存获益中分离混杂因素的影响——以德国乳腺X线筛查项目的数据为例的一种方法学途径
BMC Med. 2024 Jan 30;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03258-6.
6
Considerations for Evaluating the Introduction of New Cancer Screening Technology: Use of Interval Cancers to Assess Potential Benefits and Harms.评估新癌症筛查技术引入的考虑因素:利用间期癌评估潜在获益和危害。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;19(22):14647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214647.
7
Benefits and Risks of Mammography Screening in Women Ages 40 to 49 Years.40 至 49 岁女性乳房 X 光筛查的益处和风险。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501327211058322. doi: 10.1177/21501327211058322.
8
An analysis of Ki-67 expression in stage 1 invasive ductal breast carcinoma using apparent diffusion coefficient histograms.利用表观扩散系数直方图分析Ⅰ期浸润性导管乳腺癌中Ki-67的表达情况。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Apr;11(4):1518-1531. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-615.
9
Breast cancer distant recurrence lead time interval by detection method in an institutional cohort.基于机构队列研究的乳腺癌远处复发的检测方法及时间间隔。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Nov 20;20(1):1124. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07609-3.
10
Axillary Clearance Following Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Symptomatic Breast Cancer.腋窝清扫术在有症状乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检阳性后的应用。
In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3503-3509. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12191.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening histories of invasive breast cancers diagnosed 1989-2006 in the West Midlands, UK: variation with time and impact on 10-year survival.英国西米德兰兹地区 1989-2006 年诊断的浸润性乳腺癌的筛查史:随时间的变化及其对 10 年生存率的影响。
J Med Screen. 2009;16(4):186-92. doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009040.
2
Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival.筛查发现的乳腺癌与有症状乳腺癌的分子特征及其对生存的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2009 Oct 20;101(8):1338-44. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605317. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
3
Breast screening: the facts--or maybe not.乳房筛查:事实——或许并非如此。
BMJ. 2009 Jan 27;338:b86. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b86.
4
Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods.用于通过排序方法进行个体比较的概率表。
Biometrics. 1947 Sep;3(3):119-22.
5
The Nottingham prognostic index for invasive carcinoma of the breast.乳腺癌浸润性癌的诺丁汉预后指数。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2008 Jun;14(2):113-5. doi: 10.1007/s12253-008-9067-3. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
6
Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone?筛查发现的乳腺癌与有症状的乳腺癌:生存改善仅归因于分期迁移吗?
Br J Cancer. 2008 Jun 3;98(11):1741-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604368. Epub 2008 May 27.
7
Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival.在估计筛查检测对癌症生存的影响时校正领先时间和长度偏倚。
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Jul 1;168(1):98-104. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn120. Epub 2008 May 25.
8
Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review.研究方法和偏倚对乳腺钼靶筛查浸润性乳腺癌过度诊断估计值的影响:一项系统评价
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1129-1138. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70380-7.
9
Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening: new results.估计乳腺癌乳房X线筛查中的平均停留时间和筛查试验敏感性:新结果
J Med Screen. 2005;12(4):172-8. doi: 10.1258/096914105775220732.
10
A basal epithelial phenotype is more frequent in interval breast cancers compared with screen detected tumors.与筛查发现的肿瘤相比,基底上皮表型在间期乳腺癌中更为常见。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1108-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0394.