• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过加倍左心室辅助装置的动力轴隧道来减少动力轴感染。

Reduction of driveline infections through doubled driveline tunneling of left ventricular assist devices.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2013 Jan;37(1):102-7. doi: 10.1111/aor.12036.

DOI:10.1111/aor.12036
PMID:23305580
Abstract

The durability of ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy improved steadily over the past years. However, driveline infections remain a challenge. To test whether an improved surgical implantation technique may lower the incidence of infections, we analyzed all patients receiving a VAD implantation in the years 2008 and 2009 (group 1) and compared them with all patients who received a VAD in 2011 (group 2) after we changed our implantation method. The new technique involves tunneling of the driveline into the fascia of the musculus rectus abdominis, resulting in a longer, intrafascial run to achieve a better resistance against ascending infections. We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients in group 1 and 41 patients in group 2. One year after implantation, the infection rate was markedly reduced (22.5% [n = 9] group 1 vs. 4.9% [n = 2] group 2, P < 0.001) by the new implantation method. There was, however, no significant improvement in overall mortality. The Cox regression model identified the implantation method as an independent risk factor for 1 year after implantation driveline infection (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the new tunneling technique marks a great leap forward in long-term VAD treatment. However, overall mortality remains high and needs further improvement.

摘要

心室辅助装置 (VAD) 治疗的耐久性在过去几年中稳步提高。然而,驱动线感染仍然是一个挑战。为了测试改进的手术植入技术是否可以降低感染的发生率,我们分析了 2008 年和 2009 年(第 1 组)所有接受 VAD 植入的患者,并将他们与 2011 年(第 2 组)在改变植入方法后接受 VAD 植入的所有患者进行比较。新技术涉及将驱动线隧道至腹直肌筋膜内,从而使驱动线在筋膜内的运行更长,以更好地抵抗上行感染。我们回顾性分析了第 1 组的 40 例患者和第 2 组的 41 例患者。植入后 1 年,感染率显著降低(第 1 组为 22.5%[n=9],第 2 组为 4.9%[n=2],P<0.001),采用新的植入方法。然而,总体死亡率并没有显著改善。Cox 回归模型确定植入方法是植入后 1 年发生驱动线感染的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。总之,新的隧道技术标志着 VAD 治疗的一个重大飞跃。然而,总体死亡率仍然很高,需要进一步改善。

相似文献

1
Reduction of driveline infections through doubled driveline tunneling of left ventricular assist devices.通过加倍左心室辅助装置的动力轴隧道来减少动力轴感染。
Artif Organs. 2013 Jan;37(1):102-7. doi: 10.1111/aor.12036.
2
Prevention of percutaneous driveline infection after left ventricular assist device implantation: prophylactic antibiotics are not necessary.预防左心室辅助装置植入术后经皮导管感染:预防性使用抗生素并非必要。
ASAIO J. 2013 Nov-Dec;59(6):570-4. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182a9e2a5.
3
Late-onset driveline infections: the Achilles' heel of prolonged left ventricular assist device support.迟发性传动系统感染:长期左心室辅助装置支持的致命弱点。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;84(2):515-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.085.
4
Rectus-Sparing Technique for Driveline Insertion of Ventricular Assist Device.心室辅助装置驱动线插入的保留直肌技术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Nov;100(5):1920-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.138.
5
Reduction in driveline infection rates: Results from the HeartMate II Multicenter Driveline Silicone Skin Interface (SSI) Registry.降低动力轴感染率:来自 HeartMate II 多中心动力轴硅胶皮肤界面(SSI)登记研究的结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jun;34(6):781-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Special Treatment and Wound Care of the Driveline Exit Site after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后驱动线出口部位的特殊处理与伤口护理
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;63(8):670-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554961. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
Reduction of driveline infections through doubled driveline tunneling of left ventricular assist devices-5-year follow-up.通过将左心室辅助装置的驱动线隧道加倍减少驱动线感染——5年随访
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1703-S1710. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.127.
8
Long-term outcome of high-urgency heart transplant patients with and without temporary ventricular assist device support.接受和未接受临时心室辅助装置支持的高紧迫性心脏移植患者的长期预后。
Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2642-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.107.
9
Left ventricular assist device driveline infections.左心室辅助装置的驱动线感染。
Cardiol Clin. 2011 Nov;29(4):515-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.08.004.
10
A simple education tool for ventricular assist device patients and their caregivers.一种面向心室辅助装置患者及其护理人员的简易教育工具。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 May-Jun;30(3):E1-E10. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000122.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-patient factors associated with infections in LVAD recipients: A scoping review.与 LVAD 受者感染相关的非患者因素:范围综述。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Jan;41(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
2
Systems of conductive skin for power transfer in clinical applications.用于临床应用中的能量传递的导电皮肤系统。
Eur Biophys J. 2022 Mar;51(2):171-184. doi: 10.1007/s00249-021-01568-8. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
3
Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections.心室辅助装置相关感染
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 25;10(3):453. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030453.
4
Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Sepsis and Severe Sepsis in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者脓毒症和严重脓毒症的趋势、结局及预测因素
Cureus. 2020 Apr 3;12(4):e7523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7523.
5
How to do it: tips and tricks of minimal-invasive HVAD implantation-the lateral approach.如何操作:微创植入心室辅助装置(HVAD)的技巧——外侧入路
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1829-S1833. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.149.
6
Reduction of driveline infections through doubled driveline tunneling of left ventricular assist devices-5-year follow-up.通过将左心室辅助装置的驱动线隧道加倍减少驱动线感染——5年随访
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jun;10(Suppl 15):S1703-S1710. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.127.
7
Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: A Systematic Review.左心室辅助装置感染:系统评价。
ASAIO J. 2018 May/Jun;64(3):287-294. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000684.
8
Correlation between driveline features and driveline infection in left ventricular assist device selection.左心室辅助装置选择中传动系统特征与传动系统感染之间的相关性
J Artif Organs. 2017 Mar;20(1):34-41. doi: 10.1007/s10047-016-0923-8. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
9
Left ventricular assist device driveline infections: recent advances and future goals.左心室辅助装置驱动线感染:最新进展与未来目标
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2151-7. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.06.
10
Minimally-invasive LVAD Implantation: State of the Art.微创左心室辅助装置植入术:当前技术水平
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11(3):246-51. doi: 10.2174/1573403x1103150514151750.