Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Mar;45(3):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.12.001. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
We retrospectively analysed the results of a strategy in which coverage of the internal iliac artery (IIA) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was routinely performed without coil embolisation.
From January 2010 until May 2012, 32 patients (96.9% men; mean age 73.0 years, range 52-89 years) underwent EVAR with stent grafts extended into the external iliac artery (EIA), all without prior coil embolisation. Aneurysm morphology was determined on preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. During follow-up, patients were interviewed about buttock claudication, and the occurrence of endoleaks and evolution of aneurysm diameter were recorded.
At baseline, the mid-common iliac artery (CIA) diameter was 33.5 ± 16.8 mm and seven patients presented with ruptured aneurysms. Mean follow-up was 14.3 ± 7.4 months. There were eight deaths, none related to IIA coverage. Buttock claudication occurred in seven (22.6%) patients, which persisted after 6 months in two cases of bilateral IIA coverage. No Type-I or -II endoleaks occurred related to IIA coverage. Aneurysm growth was not observed.
Endovascular treatment of aortoiliac and iliac aneurysm without pre-emptive coil embolisation of the IIA appears safe and effective. No IIA-related endoleaks or re-interventions occurred in our series. This approach saves operating time, contrast load and costs and may reduce complications. However, a larger population and longer follow-up is required to confirm our findings.
我们回顾性分析了一种策略的结果,即在血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR)中常规覆盖髂内动脉(IIA)而不进行线圈栓塞。
从 2010 年 1 月至 2012 年 5 月,32 名患者(96.9%为男性;平均年龄 73.0 岁,范围 52-89 岁)接受了支架移植物延伸至股动脉(EIA)的 EVAR,均未进行预先的线圈栓塞。在术前计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上确定动脉瘤形态。在随访期间,对患者进行了臀部跛行的访谈,并记录了内漏的发生和动脉瘤直径的演变。
在基线时,中髂总动脉(CIA)直径为 33.5 ± 16.8mm,7 名患者有破裂的动脉瘤。平均随访时间为 14.3 ± 7.4 个月。有 8 例死亡,均与 IIA 覆盖无关。7 名(22.6%)患者出现臀部跛行,2 例双侧 IIA 覆盖的患者在 6 个月后仍持续存在。没有与 IIA 覆盖相关的 I 型或 II 型内漏。未观察到动脉瘤生长。
在不预先进行 IIA 线圈栓塞的情况下,血管内治疗腹主动脉瘤和髂动脉瘤似乎是安全有效的。在我们的系列中,没有与 IIA 相关的内漏或再次干预。这种方法节省了手术时间、造影剂负荷和成本,并可能减少并发症。然而,需要更大的人群和更长的随访时间来证实我们的发现。