Comprehensive Stroke Center, University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham, AL 35249-3280, USA.
Stroke. 2013 Feb;44(2):394-400. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.675074. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
We sought to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound criteria for recanalization during real-time transcranial Doppler monitoring of intra-arterial reperfusion procedures in acute ischemic stroke patients in an international, multicenter study.
Consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with proximal intracranial occlusions underwent intra-arterial reperfusion procedures with simultaneous real-time transcranial Doppler monitoring at 3 tertiary-care stroke centers. Residual flow signals at the site of angiographically confirmed occlusions were monitored at a constant transtemporal insonation angle using a standard head-frame. Recanalization was assessed simultaneously by digital subtraction angiography and ultrasound using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction and thrombolysis in brain ischemia (TIBI) criteria, respectively. Independent readers blinded to digital subtraction angiography performed validation of TIBI flow grades. The interrater reliability for assessment of TIBI grades was investigated.
We evaluated time-linked real-time digital subtraction angiography transcranial Doppler images from 96 diagnostic digital subtraction angiography runs during intra-arterial reperfusion procedures in 62 acute ischemic stroke patients (mean age, 59 ± 17 years; 58% men; median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 18 [interquartile range 12-21]; median time from symptom onset to intra-arterial procedure initiation, 240 minutes [interquartile range 163-308]). The interrater reliability for evaluation of TIBI grades and assessment of recanalization was good (Cohen κ: 0.838 and 0.874, respectively; P<0.001). Compared with angiography, transcranial Doppler had the following accuracy parameters for detection of complete recanalization (TIBI 4 and 5 versus thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3, flow grades): sensitivity, 88% (95% confidence interval, 72%-96%); specificity, 89% (79%-95%); positive predictive value, 81% (65%-91%); negative predictive value, 93% (84%-98%); and overall accuracy 89% (80%-94%).
At laboratories with high-interrater reliability, TIBI criteria can accurately predict brain recanalization in real time as compared with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction angiographic scores.
我们旨在评估实时经颅多普勒监测在急性缺血性卒中患者的血管内再灌注治疗中对再通的超声标准的诊断准确性,该研究为国际性、多中心研究。
连续 62 例接受近端颅内闭塞血管内再灌注治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者在 3 个三级卒中中心接受了同时实时经颅多普勒监测。使用标准头架,在恒定的经颞部超声照射角度下,对经血管造影证实闭塞部位的残余血流信号进行监测。再通通过数字减影血管造影和超声分别使用溶栓治疗脑梗死(thrombolysis in brain ischemia,TIBI)和心肌梗死溶栓(thrombolysis in myocardial infarction,TIMI)标准进行评估。独立的、对数字减影血管造影结果不知情的读者对 TIBI 血流分级进行了验证。研究了评估 TIBI 分级的组内一致性。
我们评估了 62 例急性缺血性卒中患者 96 次血管内再灌注治疗期间的实时数字减影血管造影经颅多普勒图像(平均年龄 59 ± 17 岁;58%为男性;中位基线国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分 18[四分位距 12-21];从症状发作到血管内介入开始的中位时间 240 分钟[四分位距 163-308])。评估 TIBI 分级和再通的组内一致性良好(Cohen κ:0.838 和 0.874;P<0.001)。与血管造影相比,经颅多普勒检测完全再通(TIBI 4 和 5 级与 TIMI 3 级、血流分级)的准确度参数如下:敏感性 88%(95%置信区间 72%-96%);特异性 89%(79%-95%);阳性预测值 81%(65%-91%);阴性预测值 93%(84%-98%);总准确率 89%(80%-94%)。
在组内一致性高的实验室中,TIBI 标准可与 TIMI 血管造影评分相比,实时准确地预测脑再通。