• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真空吸引分娩中镇痛不足:一项基于人群的研究。

Insufficient pain relief in vacuum extraction deliveries: a population-based study.

机构信息

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Reproductive Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Mar;92(3):306-11. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12067. Epub 2013 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.12067
PMID:23311477
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the pain relief used in association with vacuum extraction assisted deliveries and to identify risk factors for not receiving pain relief during the procedure.

DESIGN

Retrospective birth register study.

SETTING

Nationwide study in Sweden.

POPULATION

The study population consisted of all women (n = 62 568) with a singleton pregnancy who gave birth in gestational weeks 37(+0) to 41(+6) between 1999 and 2008 and were delivered by vacuum extraction.

METHOD

Register study with data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Epidural blockade, spinal blockade, pudendal nerve blockade, infiltration of the perineum, no pain relief.

RESULTS

In all, 32.4% primiparas and 51.4% multiparas who had a vacuum-assisted delivery had this without potent pain relief such as epidural blockade, spinal blockade or pudendal nerve block. When infiltration was added as a method for pain relief, 18% were still delivered without pain relief. Multiparas were more likely than primiparas to be delivered without potent pain relief, odds ratio (OR) 2.29 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.20-2.38). Compared with women delivered by vacuum extraction due to prolonged labor, those with signs of fetal distress were more likely to be delivered without potent pain relief (OR) 1.74, 95% (CI) (1.68-1.81).

CONCLUSION

A considerable number of women are delivered by vacuum extraction without pain relief. The high proportion might reflect that clinical staff do not always consider pain relief to be of high priority in vacuum extraction deliveries or that they fear impaired pushing forces.

摘要

目的

调查真空吸引辅助分娩中使用的止痛方法,并确定分娩过程中未接受止痛的风险因素。

设计

回顾性出生登记研究。

设置

瑞典全国性研究。

人群

研究人群由 1999 年至 2008 年间妊娠 37(+0)周至 41(+6)周且单胎妊娠的所有女性(n=62568)组成,分娩方式为真空吸引。

方法

采用瑞典医疗出生登记处的数据进行登记研究。

主要观察指标

硬膜外阻滞、脊髓阻滞、阴部神经阻滞、会阴浸润、无止痛。

结果

在所有接受真空辅助分娩的初产妇和经产妇中,32.4%和 51.4%的产妇没有强效止痛措施,如硬膜外阻滞、脊髓阻滞或阴部神经阻滞。当浸润被用作止痛方法时,仍有 18%的产妇没有止痛。与初产妇相比,经产妇更有可能在没有强效止痛的情况下分娩,优势比(OR)2.29 95%置信区间(CI)(2.20-2.38)。与因产程延长而接受真空吸引分娩的妇女相比,有胎儿窘迫迹象的妇女更有可能在没有强效止痛的情况下分娩(OR)1.74,95%置信区间(CI)(1.68-1.81)。

结论

相当多的妇女在接受真空吸引分娩时没有得到止痛。这一高比例可能反映了临床工作人员并不总是认为在真空吸引分娩中止痛是优先事项,或者他们担心会削弱推动力量。

相似文献

1
Insufficient pain relief in vacuum extraction deliveries: a population-based study.真空吸引分娩中镇痛不足:一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Mar;92(3):306-11. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12067. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
2
Epidural analgesia for labor pain: whose choice?硬膜外镇痛用于分娩疼痛:谁的选择?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(2):238-42. doi: 10.3109/00016340903280974.
3
Epidural analgesia during labor among immigrant women in Sweden.瑞典移民妇女分娩时的硬膜外镇痛。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(2):243-9. doi: 10.3109/00016340903508668.
4
The influence of fetal head circumference on labor outcome: a population-based register study.胎儿头围对分娩结局的影响:基于人群的注册研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Apr;91(4):470-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01358.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
5
Indications for operative delivery between 1999-2010 and induction of labor and epidural analgesia on the risk of operative delivery--a population based Swedish register study.1999-2010 年间行剖宫产术的指征与引产和硬膜外镇痛对剖宫产术风险的影响——一项基于人群的瑞典登记研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2012 Dec;3(4):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
6
Reason for the increasing use of vacuum extraction in Sweden: a population-based study.在瑞典,越来越多地使用真空吸引的原因:一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Oct;92(10):1175-82. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12215. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
7
Risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy among neonates delivered by vacuum extraction.经真空吸引分娩的新生儿发生产科臂丛神经麻痹的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;106(5 Pt 1):913-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183595.32077.83.
8
[Effect of different analgesia on pain relief during labor].[不同镇痛方法对分娩期疼痛缓解的影响]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jun;40(6):372-5.
9
Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?对失败的恐惧:我们在产房进行的器械助产操作是否过多?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443848.
10
The effect of epidural analgesia on labor progress and outcome in nulliparous women.硬膜外镇痛对初产妇产程及结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Aug;21(8):517-21. doi: 10.1080/14767050802040864.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of pudendal nerve block among midwives in Norway: A national cross-sectional study.挪威助产士使用阴部神经阻滞的情况:一项全国性横断面研究。
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Jun 7;6:34. doi: 10.18332/ejm/146690. eCollection 2022.
2
Intrapartum pudendal nerve block analgesia and risk of postpartum urinary retention: a cohort study.产时阴部神经阻滞镇痛与产后尿潴留风险:一项队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Sep;32(9):2383-2391. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04768-0. Epub 2021 Apr 16.