• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力与美赛博弈中的策略决策。

Stress and strategic decision-making in the beauty contest game.

机构信息

Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences (CEREB), University of Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, Germany; Institute of Psychology, University of Hildesheim, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany.

出版信息

Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Sep;38(9):1503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.016
PMID:23312062
Abstract

Often, economic decisions do not only depend on one's own preferences, but also on the choices of others and therefore require strategizing (i.e., thinking about what others might think). In experimental economics, this has been modeled by the beauty contest game. Another typical feature of economic decisions is that they are often carried out under stress. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to examine the influence of stress on decision-making in the beauty contest game. Participants were randomly assigned to either the Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G) or a placebo version of the TSST-G (control condition). Then, participants played four rounds of a standard beauty contest game. As a biomarker of stress, salivary cortisol was measured. As predicted, participants under stress chose higher numbers in the beauty contest game than non-stressed participants, indicating less strategizing. This effect was mediated by the stress-induced increase in cortisol.

摘要

通常情况下,经济决策不仅取决于个人的偏好,还取决于他人的选择,因此需要进行策略规划(即考虑他人的想法)。在实验经济学中,这可以通过选美比赛游戏来模拟。经济决策的另一个典型特征是,它们通常是在压力下进行的。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在研究压力对选美比赛游戏中决策的影响。参与者被随机分配到特里尔社会压力测试组(TSST-G)或 TSST-G 的安慰剂版本(对照条件)。然后,参与者玩了四轮标准的选美比赛游戏。作为压力的生物标志物,测量了唾液中的皮质醇。正如预测的那样,处于压力下的参与者在选美比赛游戏中选择的数字高于无压力的参与者,这表明他们的策略规划较少。这种效应是由皮质醇的应激诱导增加介导的。

相似文献

1
Stress and strategic decision-making in the beauty contest game.压力与美赛博弈中的策略决策。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Sep;38(9):1503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
2
Time-dependent changes in altruistic punishment following stress.应激后利他惩罚的时变变化。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Sep;38(9):1467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
3
Paradoxical effects of stress and an executive task on decisions under risk.压力和执行任务对风险决策的矛盾影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2013 Jun;127(3):369-79. doi: 10.1037/a0032334. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
4
Autism does not limit strategic thinking in the "beauty contest" game.自闭症并不限制在“选美比赛”游戏中的策略性思考。
Cognition. 2017 Mar;160:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.015. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
5
Does stress alter everyday moral decision-making?压力会改变日常的道德决策吗?
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Feb;36(2):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
6
Stress alters personal moral decision making.压力会改变个人的道德决策。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Apr;37(4):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
7
Effects of anticipatory stress on decision making in a gambling task.预期应激对赌博任务中决策的影响。
Behav Neurosci. 2007 Apr;121(2):257-63. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.257.
8
Anticipatory stress influences decision making under explicit risk conditions.预期性压力会影响明确风险条件下的决策。
Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;122(6):1352-60. doi: 10.1037/a0013281.
9
Acute psychosocial stress and everyday moral decision-making in young healthy men: The impact of cortisol.年轻健康男性的急性社会心理应激与日常道德决策:皮质醇的影响。
Horm Behav. 2017 Jul;93:72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 19.
10
Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: what does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions?执行功能、概率分类和反馈学习:在明确风险条件下进行决策时,真正重要的是什么?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Nov;33(9):1025-39. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2011.595702. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-making under stress: A psychological and neurobiological integrative model.压力下的决策:一种心理与神经生物学的整合模型。
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2024 Apr 16;38:100766. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100766. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Selective effects of psychosocial stress on plan based movement selection.心理社会压力对基于计划的运动选择的选择性影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 30;12(1):5401. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09360-0.
3
Altruism under Stress: Cortisol Negatively Predicts Charitable Giving and Neural Value Representations Depending on Mentalizing Capacity.
压力下的利他主义:皮质醇根据心理化能力负向预测慈善捐赠和神经价值表现。
J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 20;42(16):3445-3460. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1870-21.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
4
Acute stress does not affect economic behavior in the experimental laboratory.急性应激并不影响实验室内的经济行为。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0244881. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244881. eCollection 2021.
5
Developing an assessment of epistemic trust: a research protocol.制定认知信任评估:一项研究方案。
Res Psychother. 2018 Dec 18;21(3):330. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2018.330. eCollection 2018 Dec 19.
6
Compliance with Saliva Collection Protocol in Healthy Volunteers: Strategies for Managing Risk and Errors.健康志愿者唾液采集协议依从性:管理风险和错误的策略。
Int J Med Sci. 2018 May 22;15(8):823-831. doi: 10.7150/ijms.25146. eCollection 2018.
7
Stress Induces Contextual Blindness in Lotteries and Coordination Games.压力会导致在彩票和协调博弈中出现情境性盲目。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Dec 11;11:236. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00236. eCollection 2017.
8
Stress potentiates decision biases: A stress induced deliberation-to-intuition (SIDI) model.压力增强决策偏差:一种压力诱发的从深思熟虑到直觉的(SIDI)模型。
Neurobiol Stress. 2016 Feb 12;3:83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2015.12.006. eCollection 2016 Jun.
9
Acute stress alters individual risk taking in a time-dependent manner and leads to anti-social risk.急性应激以时间依赖的方式改变个体的冒险行为,并导致反社会风险。
Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Apr;45(7):877-885. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13395. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
10
Effects of Acute Laboratory Stress on Executive Functions.急性实验室应激对执行功能的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 31;7:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00461. eCollection 2016.