University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Behav Ther. 2013 Mar;44(1):137-51. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend previous findings (Tollison et al., 2008) on the association between peer facilitator adherence to motivational interviewing (MI) microskills and college student drinking behavior. This study used a larger sample size, multiple follow-up time-points, and latent variable analyses allowing for more complex models to be tested in a sample with different characteristics than Tollison et al. Matriculating students who participated in high school sports (N=327) took part in a Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students led by peer facilitators trained in motivational interviewing (MI). Participants were assessed pre- and immediately postintervention on contemplation to change, as well as pre-, 5months, and 10months postintervention on drinking quantity. Independent coders used the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity scale (Moyers, Martin, Manuel, & Miller, 2003) to evaluate therapist MI adherence. Contrary to our previous study, results indicated that a higher number of open questions was positively related to increases in drinking, especially for heavier drinkers. Congruent with the previous study, more simple reflections was positively related to increases in drinking. Finally, this study revealed that heavier baseline drinking was associated with more simple reflections. There were no significant results found for changes in contemplation. Results corroborate previous findings that the excessive use of simple reflections may be indicative of countertherapeutic outcomes while raising questions about the relationship between the frequency of open questions and therapeutic outcomes.
本研究旨在复制和扩展先前的研究结果(Tollison 等人,2008),即同伴促进者对动机访谈(MI)微观技能的遵守与大学生饮酒行为之间的关联。本研究使用了更大的样本量、多个随访时间点,并进行了潜在变量分析,允许在具有与 Tollison 等人不同特征的样本中测试更复杂的模型。参加由接受过动机访谈(MI)培训的同伴促进者主导的大学生简要酒精筛查和干预的高中生(N=327)参与了本研究。参与者在干预前和干预后立即评估改变的沉思,以及在干预前、5 个月和 10 个月后评估饮酒量。独立编码员使用动机访谈治疗完整性量表(Moyers、Martin、Manuel 和 Miller,2003)评估治疗师的 MI 依从性。与我们之前的研究结果相反,结果表明,更多的开放式问题与饮酒量的增加呈正相关,尤其是对重度饮酒者而言。与之前的研究一致,更多的简单反映与饮酒量的增加呈正相关。最后,本研究表明,更高的基线饮酒量与更多的简单反映有关。沉思变化没有显著结果。研究结果证实了先前的发现,即过度使用简单反映可能表明治疗效果不佳,同时对开放式问题的频率与治疗效果之间的关系提出了质疑。