Suppr超能文献

成人人工关节感染的当前管理:新兴感染网络调查的结果。

Current management of prosthetic joint infections in adults: results of an Emerging Infections Network survey.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 Mar;41(3):272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.10.023. Epub 2013 Jan 9.

Abstract

There is a dearth of guidance on the management of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), in particular because of the lack of high-quality evidence for optimal antibiotics. Thus, we designed a nine-question survey of current practices and preferences among members of the Emerging Infections Network, a CDC-sponsored network of infectious diseases physicians, which was distributed in May 2012. In total, 556 (47.2%) of 1178 network members responded. As first-line antibiotic choice for MSSA PJI, 59% of responders indicated oxacillin/nafcillin, 33% cefazolin and 7% ceftriaxone; the commonest alternative was cefazolin (46%). For MRSA PJI, 90% preferred vancomycin, 7% daptomycin and 0.8% ceftaroline; the commonest alternative was daptomycin (65%). Antibiotic selection for coagulase-negative staphylococci varied depending on methicillin susceptibility. For staphylococcal PJIs with retained hardware, most providers would add rifampicin. Propionibacterium is usually treated with vancomycin (40%), penicillin (23%) or ceftriaxone (17%). Most responders thought 10-19% of all PJIs were culture-negative. Culture-negative PJIs of the lower extremities are usually treated with a vancomycin/fluoroquinolone combination, and culture-negative shoulder PJIs with vancomycin/ceftriaxone. The most cited criteria for selecting antibiotics were ease of administration and the safety profile. A treatment duration of 6-8 weeks is preferred (by 77% of responders) and is mostly guided by clinical response and inflammatory markers. Ninety-nine percent of responders recommend oral antibiotic suppression (for varying durations) in patients with retained hardware. In conclusion, there is considerable variation in treatment of PJIs both with identified pathogens and those with negative cultures. Future studies should aim to identify optimum treatment strategies.

摘要

目前针对人工关节感染(PJI)的管理缺乏指导,特别是由于缺乏高质量的证据来确定最佳抗生素。因此,我们设计了一项针对新兴感染网络(CDC 赞助的传染病医生网络)成员当前实践和偏好的九项问题调查,该调查于 2012 年 5 月进行。在总共 1178 名网络成员中,有 556 名(47.2%)做出了回应。对于 MSSA PJI 的一线抗生素选择,59%的应答者表示选择苯唑西林/萘夫西林,33%选择头孢唑林,7%选择头孢曲松;最常见的替代药物是头孢唑林(46%)。对于 MRSA PJI,90%的人首选万古霉素,7%的人首选达托霉素,0.8%的人首选头孢地尔;最常见的替代药物是达托霉素(65%)。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的抗生素选择取决于耐甲氧西林情况。对于保留内植物的葡萄球菌 PJI,大多数提供者会添加利福平。痤疮丙酸杆菌通常用万古霉素(40%)、青霉素(23%)或头孢曲松(17%)治疗。大多数应答者认为所有 PJI 中有 10-19%的为培养阴性。下肢培养阴性 PJI 通常用万古霉素/氟喹诺酮类药物联合治疗,肩部培养阴性 PJI 则用万古霉素/头孢曲松治疗。选择抗生素的最主要依据是给药的便利性和安全性。6-8 周的治疗疗程是首选(77%的应答者),主要根据临床反应和炎症标志物来决定。99%的应答者建议在保留内植物的患者中使用口服抗生素抑制(持续不同时间)。总之,对于有明确病原体和培养阴性的 PJI,治疗方法存在很大差异。未来的研究应该旨在确定最佳的治疗策略。

相似文献

5
Antibiotic resistance in early periprosthetic joint infection.人工关节周围早期感染中的抗生素耐药性
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Dec;86(12):1014-1018. doi: 10.1111/ans.13720. Epub 2016 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

3
Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections: Do we have an issue?培养阴性的人工关节周围感染:我们存在问题吗?
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024 May 10;52:102430. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102430. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Ten questions on prosthetic shoulder infection.关于人工肩关节感染的十个问题。
Shoulder Elbow. 2016 Jul;8(3):151-7. doi: 10.1177/1758573216632464. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
8
Two-Stage Total Knee Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection.用于人工关节感染的两阶段全膝关节置换术
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015 Jun;27(2):82-9. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.2.82. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

3
Pathogenesis and treatment concepts of orthopaedic biofilm infections.骨科生物膜感染的发病机制与治疗理念
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012 Jul;65(2):158-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00938.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
4
Management and prevention of prosthetic joint infection.人工关节感染的管理与预防。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2012 Mar;26(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2011.09.011.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验