Animal Behavior and Well-Being Group, Department of Animal Science, Purdue University, 915 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2013 Feb 17;110-111:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
In laboratories, mice are housed at 20-24 °C, which is below their lower critical temperature (≈30 °C). Thus, mice are potentially cold stressed, which can alter metabolism, immune function, and reproduction. These physiological changes reflect impaired wellbeing, and affect scientific outcomes. We hypothesized that nesting material would allow mice to alleviate cold stress by controlling their thermal microenvironment, thus insulating them, reducing heat loss and thermogenic processes. Naïve C57BL/6, CD-1, and BALB/c mice (24 male and 24 female/strain in groups of 3) were housed in standard cages at 20 °C either with or without 8 g nesting material for 4 weeks. Core body temperature was followed using intraperitoneal radio telemetry. The thermal properties of the nests were assessed using a thermal imaging camera, and related to nest quality. Higher scoring nests were negatively correlated with the mean radiated temperature and were thus more insulating. No effects of nesting material on body temperature were found. CD-1 mice with nesting material had higher end body weights than controls. No effect was seen in the other two strains. Mice with the telemetry implant had larger spleens than controls, possibly indicating an immune response to the implant or low level infection from the surgery. BALB/c mice express less mRNA for the UCP1 protein than mice without nesting material. This indicates that BALB/c's with nesting material do not utilize their brown fat to create heat as readily as controls. Nests can alleviate thermal discomfort by decreasing the amount of radiated heat and reduce the need for non-shivering thermogenesis. However, different strains appear to use different behavioral (through different primary modes of behavioral thermoregulation) and physiological strategies (utilizing thermogenesis to different degrees) to maintain a constant body temperature under cool standard laboratory ambient temperatures.
在实验室中,老鼠被饲养在 20-24°C 的环境中,这低于它们的下限临界温度(≈30°C)。因此,老鼠可能会受到冷应激,这会改变它们的代谢、免疫功能和繁殖。这些生理变化反映了它们健康状况受损,并影响了科学结果。我们假设,筑巢材料可以通过控制其热微环境来缓解老鼠的冷应激,从而为它们保暖,减少热量损失和产热过程。我们将 24 只雄性和 24 只雌性/品系的 C57BL/6、CD-1 和 BALB/c 老鼠(每组 3 只)饲养在 20°C 的标准笼中,有的有 8 克筑巢材料,有的没有,为期 4 周。使用腹腔内无线电遥测技术监测核心体温。使用热成像摄像机评估巢的热特性,并将其与巢的质量相关联。评分较高的巢与平均辐射温度呈负相关,因此具有更好的保温效果。我们没有发现筑巢材料对体温有任何影响。有筑巢材料的 CD-1 老鼠的终体重比对照组高。其他两个品系没有观察到这种影响。带有遥测植入物的老鼠的脾脏比对照组大,这可能表明它们对植入物有免疫反应或手术时受到了低水平的感染。BALB/c 老鼠的 UCP1 蛋白的 mRNA 表达量低于没有筑巢材料的老鼠。这表明,有筑巢材料的 BALB/c 老鼠不像对照组那样容易利用棕色脂肪产热。巢可以通过减少辐射热量的数量来减轻热不适,并减少非颤抖产热的需求。然而,不同的品系似乎使用不同的行为(通过不同的主要行为体温调节模式)和生理策略(不同程度地利用产热)来在凉爽的标准实验室环境温度下维持恒定的体温。