Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;11(4):430-436.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.017. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Biliary cannulation is unsuccessful during 5%-10% of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures. Needle knife sphincterotomy (NKS) can improve success of cannulation but is often used as a last resort and is associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of performing NKS during early stages of difficult cannulation and the relationship between difficult cannulation and the risk of PEP.
We performed a prospective trial of consecutive patients with an intact papilla who were undergoing ERCP at tertiary referral center; 73 patients were defined as having difficult biliary cannulation according to predefined cannulation parameters. These patients were randomly assigned to groups that received either NKS or continued standard cannulation. Main outcome measures were PEP and successful biliary cannulation.
Of 464 patients with an intact papilla undergoing ERCP, 73 met the criteria for difficult cannulation. Cannulation success in difficult cannulation cases was 86%, with a PEP rate of 19%. There was no difference in eventual cannulation success between the groups. However, 65% of the patients assigned to the standard cannulation group required crossover to NKS. There was no significant difference in development of PEP among patients in the early NKS group (20.5%) vs standard cannulation (17.6%). Pancreatic duct stents were inserted in 23 of the patients in the early NKS arm and in 15 in the standard cannulation arm. The number of cannulation attempts (more than 7) increased the risk of PEP (P < .01). On the basis of multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for PEP were failure of early cannulation and failure of biliary cannulation.
Early application of NKS during difficult cannulation does not increase the risk of PEP. The risk of PEP increases greatly after 7-8 attempts at or failure of cannulation. Further studies are required to assess whether early implementation of NKS during difficult cannulation reduces the development of PEP. Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials registry: ANZTRN 12,612,000,060,842.
在 5%-10%的内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)术中,胆道插管未能成功。针形刀括约肌切开术(NKS)可以提高插管成功率,但通常作为最后手段使用,并且与 ERCP 后胰腺炎(PEP)有关。我们评估了在困难插管的早期阶段进行 NKS 的安全性和有效性,以及困难插管与 PEP 风险之间的关系。
我们对在三级转诊中心进行 ERCP 的完整乳头患者进行了前瞻性试验;根据预设的插管参数,73 例患者被定义为有困难的胆道插管。这些患者被随机分配到接受 NKS 或继续标准插管的组。主要观察指标为 PEP 和胆道插管成功。
在 464 例有完整乳头的患者中,73 例符合困难插管标准。困难插管病例的插管成功率为 86%,PEP 发生率为 19%。两组最终插管成功率无差异。然而,标准插管组中有 65%的患者需要转为 NKS。早期 NKS 组(20.5%)和标准插管组(17.6%)的 PEP 发生率无显著差异。在早期 NKS 组的 23 例患者和标准插管组的 15 例患者中插入了胰管支架。插管尝试次数(超过 7 次)增加了 PEP 的风险(P<.01)。基于多变量分析,PEP 的独立危险因素是早期插管失败和胆道插管失败。
在困难插管时早期应用 NKS 不会增加 PEP 的风险。在插管尝试 7-8 次或失败后,PEP 的风险大大增加。需要进一步研究以评估在困难插管期间早期实施 NKS 是否可以降低 PEP 的发生。澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心:ANZTRN 12,612,000,060,842。