Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building 2, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, NG5 1PB Nottingham, UK.
Hum Reprod. 2013 Apr;28(4):960-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des451. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
What are the age-specific incident rates of clinically recorded fertility problems in women aged 15-49 years and how do they vary by socioeconomic group and geographic area.
The incident rate of recorded fertility problems was highest in women age 30-34 years: about 1% of women per annum. Overall rates did not vary by socioeconomic group; however, age-specific rates varied substantially by socioeconomic deprivation quintile; among younger women, deprivation was associated with higher infertility rates.
The rates of infertility in the UK range from 2 to 26%. Infertility definitions and denominators vary widely, and most current evidence is based on questionnaire studies that are subject to recall, reporting and selection bias. The current paper presents population-based estimates of clinically recorded fertility problems in women of reproductive age and the variation by age and socioeconomic deprivation quintile across different regions of the UK, using a nationally representative cohort of women that is larger than any previous study. Although infertility overall does not vary by socioeconomic status, consultation for fertility problems is closely related to socioeconomic patterns of women's age at first conception, demonstrating that many couples have pre-existing, rather than specifically age-related, infertility.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This cohort study used data from The Health Improvement Network, a computerized primary care database of anonymized patient records from general practices across the UK, with prospective health records on over 1.7 million women between 1990 and 2010.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING AND METHODS: Our cohort included 1,776,746 women of reproductive age (age 15-49 years) who contributed one or more years of active general practice registration. We estimated rates of new clinically recorded fertility problems in these women using medical records and medications exclusively used to treat infertility. We assessed variation in age-specific incidence by socioeconomic deprivation quintile and geographic area using Poisson regression.
The rate of incident recorded fertility problems was highest in women in the 30-34 year age group (10.9 per 1000 person-years), which equates to approximately 1% of women per annum in this age group. Lowest rates were in women in the 15-19 and 45-49 year age groups (0.7 and 0.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively). Overall rates did not vary by socioeconomic group, measured using quintiles of the Townsend index. Age-specific rates, however, varied substantially with socioeconomic deprivation quintile (P-value for interaction < 0.0001) such that up to age 25, women with more deprivation had more recorded fertility problems [rate ratio (RR) comparing most to least deprived 5.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4-7.2 at 15-20 years of age]. This reversed from age 25 to 39, when women with more deprivation had fewer recorded fertility problems (RR 0.6 95% CI 0.5-0.6 at age 30-34). After age 40, there was no socioeconomic gradient in absolute rates.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is by far the largest population-based study to estimate clinically recorded fertility problems in women and the first in the UK to assess variation across such a broad age group from 15 to 49 years. Our data, however, did not capture women who experience difficulty in conceiving, but do not consult their general practitioner (GP) regarding fertility problems.
Compared with existing estimates, our measures of the extent and distribution of recorded fertility problems in primary care are more useful for GPs, primary care trusts and policy makers for the planning and delivery of fertility services. We have shown a high burden of infertility with little geographic variation; however, the significant burden in young, more deprived women needs recognition in light of age restrictions for treatment availability for infertility in the UK. Not only does treatment access need to be universal and more equitably allocated across socioeconomic groups, but also more resources are required to reduce fertility problems by targeting modifiable risk factors.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): There was no direct source of funding for this research work. N.N.D. completed the work as part of an M.Sc., which was funded by Developing Solutions Scholarship provided by the International Office, University of Nottingham. J.W. is supported by a University of Nottingham/National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Clinical Research Fellowship.
Not applicable.
15-49 岁女性中临床记录的生育问题的年龄特异性发生率是多少,它们在社会经济群体和地理区域之间如何变化?
记录的生育问题的发生率在 30-34 岁的女性中最高:约为每年 1%的女性。总体发生率与社会经济群体无关;然而,特定年龄的发生率与社会经济剥夺五分位数有很大差异;在年轻女性中,贫困与不孕率升高有关。
英国的不孕率在 2%到 26%之间。不孕定义和分母差异很大,目前大多数证据都基于问卷调查研究,这些研究容易受到回忆、报告和选择偏差的影响。目前的论文根据全国代表性的生育年龄女性队列,使用以前任何研究都更大的样本量,提出了临床记录的生育问题的人群估计,并根据英国不同地区的年龄和社会经济剥夺五分位数进行了变化。尽管总体而言,不孕与社会经济地位无关,但对生育问题的咨询与女性首次受孕年龄的社会经济模式密切相关,这表明许多夫妇有预先存在的、而不是特定于年龄的不孕问题。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:本队列研究使用了来自英国全科医生数据库的匿名患者记录的电子健康改善网络的数据,该数据库包括 1990 年至 2010 年期间超过 170 万女性的前瞻性健康记录。
参与者/材料、设置和方法:我们的队列包括 1776746 名生育年龄(15-49 岁)的女性,她们在一般实践中登记了一年或多年的活动。我们使用专门用于治疗不孕的医疗记录和药物来估计这些女性新出现的临床记录生育问题的发生率。我们使用泊松回归评估了按社会经济剥夺五分位数和地理区域划分的特定年龄发病率的差异。
记录的生育问题的发生率在 30-34 岁的女性中最高(每 1000 人年 10.9 例),相当于该年龄组每年约有 1%的女性。发病率最低的是 15-19 岁和 45-49 岁的女性(分别为每 1000 人年 0.7 和 0.4 例)。总体发生率与使用城镇指数五分位数衡量的社会经济群体无关。然而,特定年龄的比率,与社会经济剥夺五分位数有很大差异(交互作用的 P 值 < 0.0001),以至于在 25 岁之前,社会经济水平较低的女性有更多的生育问题记录[比较最受剥夺和最不受剥夺的女性的比率比(RR)为 5.6,95%置信区间(CI)为 4.4-7.2 岁)。从 25 岁到 39 岁,情况发生了逆转,此时社会经济水平较高的女性记录的生育问题较少(RR 0.6,95%CI 0.5-0.6,在 30-34 岁时)。40 岁以后,绝对发生率没有社会经济梯度。
局限性、谨慎的原因:这是迄今为止估计英国女性临床记录生育问题的最大规模的人群研究,也是第一个评估从 15 岁到 49 岁广泛年龄组的变化的研究。然而,我们的数据没有捕捉到那些经历生育困难但没有向他们的全科医生(GP)咨询生育问题的女性。
与现有估计相比,我们在初级保健中记录生育问题的程度和分布的衡量标准对全科医生、初级保健信托和政策制定者更有用,用于规划和提供生育服务。我们已经显示了大量的不孕问题,而且没有地理差异;然而,在年轻、贫困程度较高的女性中,由于英国对不孕治疗的可用性存在年龄限制,因此需要认识到这一问题的严重程度。不仅需要普及治疗机会,而且需要在社会经济群体之间更公平地分配,而且还需要通过针对可改变的风险因素来减少生育问题。
研究资金/利益冲突:这项研究没有直接的资金来源。N.N.D. 完成了这项工作,作为国际办公室发展解决方案奖学金的一部分,该奖学金由诺丁汉大学提供。J.W. 得到了诺丁汉大学/国家卫生研究院(NIHR)高级临床研究奖学金的支持。
不适用。