• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

8 年单中心心脏再同步治疗经验:手术成功率、早期和晚期并发症以及左心室导线性能。

An 8-year single-centre experience of cardiac resynchronisation therapy: procedural success, early and late complications, and left ventricular lead performance.

机构信息

The Heart Hospital, Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, 16-18 Westmoreland Street, London, London, UK.

出版信息

Europace. 2013 May;15(5):711-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus401. Epub 2013 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1093/europace/eus401
PMID:23315159
Abstract

AIMS

Despite the increasing number of device implants worldwide, little is known about the early and late complications of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) or the incidence of these complications in patients with different heart failure aetiologies. We aim to determine procedural success and early and late complications in CRT patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All early (<90 days) and late (>90 days) complications occurring over 490 consecutive CRT procedures in 402 patients, from a large single-centre registry between 2000 and 2009 were analysed. Mean follow-up duration was 1012 ± 610 days. In addition, procedural data and long-term left ventricular (LV) lead performance were examined. The mean age of patients was 65 ± 15 years, 31% were female. The majority of devices (70%) were CRT-defibrillators. Left ventricular lead implantation was achieved after one or more than one attempt in 96.7% of patients (first procedure was successful in 95.1%). The incidence of early and late complications was 9.4% and 6.1% respectively. Infection and lead displacement were the most common complications. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) was associated with significantly more complications than ischaemic cardiomyopathy (P = 0.01) and these occurred later in the DCM population. Long-term LV lead performance was comparable with that of right atrial and ventricular leads.

CONCLUSION

Transvenous implantation of the LV lead is safe and achievable for CRT with high procedural success rates. For the first time we describe the late complications from CRT in different heart failure populations. This group of patients must be kept under surveillance, not only for heart failure events but also for device-related issues. The reasons for higher complication rates in DCM patients require further evaluation.

摘要

目的

尽管全球设备植入数量不断增加,但对于心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的早期和晚期并发症,以及不同心力衰竭病因患者的这些并发症发生率,我们知之甚少。我们旨在确定 CRT 患者的手术成功率以及早期和晚期并发症。

方法和结果

我们分析了 2000 年至 2009 年期间在一个大型单中心注册中心的 402 例患者的 490 例连续 CRT 手术中所有(<90 天)和晚期(>90 天)并发症。平均随访时间为 1012±610 天。此外,还检查了手术数据和长期左心室(LV)导线性能。患者的平均年龄为 65±15 岁,31%为女性。大多数设备(70%)为 CRT 除颤器。96.7%的患者(第一次手术成功率为 95.1%)在一次或多次尝试后实现了左心室导线植入。早期和晚期并发症的发生率分别为 9.4%和 6.1%。感染和导线移位是最常见的并发症。扩张型心肌病(DCM)比缺血性心肌病(ICM)的并发症明显更多(P=0.01),且 DCM 患者的并发症发生时间较晚。长期 LV 导线性能与右心房和心室导线性能相当。

结论

经静脉植入 LV 导线用于 CRT 是安全的,且具有较高的手术成功率。我们首次描述了不同心力衰竭人群中 CRT 的晚期并发症。这群患者不仅需要密切监测心力衰竭事件,还需要密切监测与设备相关的问题。DCM 患者并发症发生率较高的原因需要进一步评估。

相似文献

1
An 8-year single-centre experience of cardiac resynchronisation therapy: procedural success, early and late complications, and left ventricular lead performance.8 年单中心心脏再同步治疗经验:手术成功率、早期和晚期并发症以及左心室导线性能。
Europace. 2013 May;15(5):711-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus401. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
2
Lead complications, device infections, and clinical outcomes in the first year after implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker.心脏再同步治疗除颤器和心脏再同步治疗起搏器植入后第一年的 Lead 并发症、器械感染和临床结局。
Europace. 2013 Jan;15(1):71-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus247. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
3
Success rate of transvenous left ventricular lead implantation for cardiac resynchronisation therapy - recent experience of a single centre.经静脉左心室导线植入治疗心脏再同步化治疗的成功率 - 单中心的近期经验。
Kardiol Pol. 2010 Aug;68(8):903-9.
4
Impact of using a telescoping-support catheter system for left ventricular lead placement on implant success and procedure time of cardiac resynchronization therapy.使用可伸缩支撑导管系统进行左心室导线植入对心脏再同步治疗植入成功率和手术时间的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 May;36(5):553-8. doi: 10.1111/pace.12103. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
5
Epicardial leads in adult cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients: a study on lead performance, durability, and safety.成人心脏再同步治疗患者的心外膜导联:关于导联性能、耐久性和安全性的研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Mar;12(3):533-539. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
6
Long-term outcome of leads and patients following robotic epicardial left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中机器人心外膜左心室电极植入后电极及患者的长期预后
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Feb;34(2):235-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02943.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
7
Complications of permanent cardiac pacing in patients with persistent left superior vena cava.永存左上腔静脉患者永久性心脏起搏的并发症
Cardiol J. 2014;21(2):128-37. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0006. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
8
Event-free survival following CRT with surgically implanted LV leads versus standard transvenous approach.与标准经静脉途径相比,采用手术植入左心室导线的CRT后的无事件生存期。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;34(4):490-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.03014.x.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization with Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead.经心外膜左心室导线进行心脏再同步化治疗的临床结果
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;38(10):1201-9. doi: 10.1111/pace.12687. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
10
The impact of the right ventricular lead position on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.右心室导线位置对心脏再同步治疗反应的影响。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;34(4):467-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02995.x. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Performance of Epicardial versus Transvenous Left Ventricular Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.用于心脏再同步治疗的心外膜与经静脉左心室导线的长期性能
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 5;12(18):5766. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185766.
2
Thoracoscopic Implantation of Epicardial Left Ventricular Lead for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.用于心脏再同步治疗的经胸腔镜植入心外膜左心室电极
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 May 16;9(5):160. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9050160.
3
Orthodromic and Antidromic Snare Techniques for Left Ventricular Lead Implantation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
心脏再同步治疗中左心室导线植入的顺行和逆行圈套技术
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 11;11(8):2133. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082133.
4
Non-infective left ventricular lead complications requiring re-intervention following cardiac resynchronization therapy: prevalence, causes and outcomes.心脏再同步治疗后需要再次干预的非感染性左心室导线并发症:发生率、原因及结果
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;63(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00947-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Coronary Sinus Stenting for the Management of Left Ventricular Lead Displacement during Resynchronization Therapy: A Report of Two Cases.冠状动脉窦支架置入术治疗心脏再同步化治疗期间左心室电极移位:两例报告
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2018 Jan;13(1):27-31.
6
Non-contrast cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is feasible in case of renal insufficiency.在肾功能不全的情况下,非对比剂心脏再同步化治疗植入是可行的。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;44(1):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0027-z. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
7
Trends in the incidence and prevalence of cardiac pacemaker insertions in an ageing population.老年人群中心脏起搏器植入的发病率和患病率趋势。
Open Heart. 2014 Dec 10;1(1):e000177. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2014-000177. eCollection 2014.