Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Illinois 60208, USA.
Psychophysiology. 2013 May;50(5):454-64. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12018. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
In an event-related potential (ERP)-based concealed information test (CIT), we investigated the effect of manipulated awareness of concealed information on the ERPs. Participants either committed a mock crime or not (guilty vs. innocent) before the CIT, and received feedback regarding either specific (high awareness) or general (low awareness) task performance during the CIT. We found that awareness and recognition of the crime-relevant information differentially influenced the frontal-central N200 and parietal P300: Probe elicited a larger N200 than irrelevant only when guilty participants were in the high awareness condition, whereas the P300 was mainly responsive to information recognition. No N200-P300 correlation was found, allowing for a combined measure of both yielding the highest detection efficiency in the high awareness group (AUC = .91). Finally, a color-naming Stroop task following the CIT revealed that guilty participants showed larger interference effects than innocent participants, suggesting that the former expended more attentional resources during the CIT.
在基于事件相关电位(ERP)的隐藏信息测试(CIT)中,我们研究了操纵对隐藏信息的意识对 ERP 的影响。参与者在 CIT 之前要么犯下模拟犯罪,要么没有(有罪与无罪),并在 CIT 期间收到关于特定(高意识)或一般(低意识)任务表现的反馈。我们发现,对犯罪相关信息的意识和识别会对额中央 N200 和顶叶 P300 产生不同的影响:只有在有罪参与者处于高意识状态时,探针诱发的 N200 才会大于不相关的 N200,而 P300 主要对信息识别做出反应。没有发现 N200-P300 相关性,因此可以对两者进行联合测量,在高意识组中获得最高的检测效率(AUC=0.91)。最后,CIT 后进行的颜色命名 Stroop 任务显示,有罪参与者比无罪参与者表现出更大的干扰效应,这表明前者在 CIT 期间消耗了更多的注意力资源。