Center for the Integration of Research & Practice (CIRP), National Development & Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI), New York, NY 10010, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 May-Jun;44(5):488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.11.001. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
The paper reports on the capability of New York State (NYS) outpatient programs to provide integrated services for co-occurring disorders (COD). Assessments of 447 outpatient clinics, using two dual diagnosis capability indices (one used in addiction settings, the other in mental health settings), produced an overall score of 2.70, interpreted to position NYS clinics closer to "capable" (3.0 = Dual Diagnosis Capable) than to "basic" (1.0 = Alcohol [Mental Health] Only Services). "Assessment" and "Staffing" received the highest scores; i.e., clients with COD were usually identified, and staff (with some additional training and supervision) could treat both disorders effectively. While programs were generally prepared for clients with COD (e.g., welcoming such clients into the program, employing staff with competencies in both disorders, and having established routine screening and assessment to identify COD), results showed that the actual delivery of effective treatment was less satisfactory. The project demonstrated that COD capability can be assessed system-wide, using direct observation.
本文报告了纽约州(NYS)门诊项目为共病(COD)提供综合服务的能力。使用两种双重诊断能力指数(一种用于成瘾环境,另一种用于心理健康环境)对 447 家门诊诊所进行评估,得出的总分为 2.70,表明 NYS 诊所更接近“有能力”(3.0=双重诊断能力)而不是“基本”(1.0=仅提供酒精[心理健康]服务)。“评估”和“人员配备”得分最高;即,通常可以识别出患有 COD 的客户,并且员工(经过一些额外的培训和监督)可以有效地治疗两种疾病。虽然这些项目通常为患有 COD 的客户做好了准备(例如,欢迎此类客户进入项目,聘请在两种疾病方面都有能力的员工,并建立常规筛查和评估以识别 COD),但结果表明,实际提供有效的治疗效果并不尽如人意。该项目表明,可以使用直接观察对 COD 能力进行系统评估。