Aortobiiliac bypass to the distal external iliac artery versus aortobifemoral bypass: a matched cohort study.

Vascular bypass has long been the standard surgical treatment for symptomatic aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Conventional wisdom has been that aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) be performed for AIOD because of the inevitable progression of iliac atherosclerosis leading to bypass thrombosis. However, ABF is prone to significant groin incision complications such as infection and lymphocele. The purpose of this study was to determine if aortobiiliac bypass (ABI) to the distal external iliac artery performs similarly to ABF in cases in which minimal atherosclerosis is present in the distal iliac arteries. Of patients undergoing aortic reconstruction for symptomatic AIOD between July 1998 and December 2008, 37 were found to have minimal atherosclerosis in the distal external iliac arteries and underwent ABI. These were compared with patients undergoing ABF using a retrospective matched cohort design. The indication for ABI was claudication in 86.5 per cent and critical limb ischemia in 13.5 per cent. There was no difference found in overall bypass patency. The 1-, 3-, and, 5-year patencies were 97, 92, and 79 per cent in the ABI group and 93, 85, and 76 per cent in the ABF group, respectively (P = 0.8). The incidence of groin wound complications in the ABF group was 14.6 per cent. ABI to the distal external iliac artery achieves equivalent graft patencies to ABF without added risk of associated groin wound complications. These data suggest that ABI be preferentially considered to ABF in situations when the very distal external iliac arteries are patent and free of significant atherosclerotic disease.