Shapiro B K, Palmer F B, Antell S E, Bilker S, Ross A, Capute A J
Kennedy Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1990 Apr;29(4):206-13. doi: 10.1177/000992289002900401.
To determine whether formula-based definitions of specific reading disability (SRD) were related to the actual classroom performance of children aged 7 1/2, the authors applied five definitions of SRD to a cohort of 243 children. The children were followed from birth and not selected on the basis of cognitive, reading, or academic performance criteria. The authors determined the concurrent validity of each of the formulas by comparing the prediction of each definition to whether the child received additional reading help in the classroom. Although the years behind method was significantly better than other approaches, no method identified more than 48 percent of the children who were given additional reading help. This study questions the ability of formula-based definitions adequately to identify young children with reading dysfunction.
为了确定基于公式的特定阅读障碍(SRD)定义是否与7岁半儿童的实际课堂表现相关,作者将SRD的五种定义应用于243名儿童的队列中。这些儿童从出生起就被跟踪,且不是根据认知、阅读或学业成绩标准挑选出来的。作者通过比较每个定义的预测结果与孩子在课堂上是否接受额外阅读帮助,来确定每个公式的同时效度。尽管落后年限法明显优于其他方法,但没有一种方法能识别出超过48%接受额外阅读帮助的儿童。这项研究对基于公式的定义能否充分识别有阅读功能障碍的幼儿提出了质疑。