Suppr超能文献

需要阅读帮助的幼儿的检测。特定阅读障碍公式的评估。

Detection of young children in need of reading help. Evaluation of specific reading disability formulas.

作者信息

Shapiro B K, Palmer F B, Antell S E, Bilker S, Ross A, Capute A J

机构信息

Kennedy Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1990 Apr;29(4):206-13. doi: 10.1177/000992289002900401.

Abstract

To determine whether formula-based definitions of specific reading disability (SRD) were related to the actual classroom performance of children aged 7 1/2, the authors applied five definitions of SRD to a cohort of 243 children. The children were followed from birth and not selected on the basis of cognitive, reading, or academic performance criteria. The authors determined the concurrent validity of each of the formulas by comparing the prediction of each definition to whether the child received additional reading help in the classroom. Although the years behind method was significantly better than other approaches, no method identified more than 48 percent of the children who were given additional reading help. This study questions the ability of formula-based definitions adequately to identify young children with reading dysfunction.

摘要

为了确定基于公式的特定阅读障碍(SRD)定义是否与7岁半儿童的实际课堂表现相关,作者将SRD的五种定义应用于243名儿童的队列中。这些儿童从出生起就被跟踪,且不是根据认知、阅读或学业成绩标准挑选出来的。作者通过比较每个定义的预测结果与孩子在课堂上是否接受额外阅读帮助,来确定每个公式的同时效度。尽管落后年限法明显优于其他方法,但没有一种方法能识别出超过48%接受额外阅读帮助的儿童。这项研究对基于公式的定义能否充分识别有阅读功能障碍的幼儿提出了质疑。

相似文献

3
Comparisons of cutoff and regression-based definitions of reading disabilities.
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Jun-Jul;22(6):334-8, 355. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200603.
8
An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia.阅读障碍差异定义的评估。
J Learn Disabil. 1992 Dec;25(10):618-29. doi: 10.1177/002221949202501001.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验