Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Lund University and Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):857-66. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318274157e.
To compare the plasma volume (PV) expanding effect of a fast infusion rate with that of a slow infusion rate of a fixed volume of 5% albumin, of the synthetic colloids, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and 4% gelatin, and of 0.9% NaCl in a rat sepsis model and to compare the plasma-expanding effect among these fluids.
Prospective, randomized animal study.
University hospital laboratory.
One hundred and twelve adult male rats.
Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and incision followed by closure of the abdomen. After 3 hrs, an infusion of the PV expander under study was started at a volume of 12mL/kg for the colloids and of 48mL/kg for 0.9% NaCl, either for 15 mins or for 3 hrs. A control group underwent the same experimental procedure but no fluid was given.
Three hours after start of the infusion (end of experiment), the plasma-expanding effect was better with a slow than a fast infusion rate for the colloids, especially albumin, but the NaCl groups did not differ significantly from the control group. The PV for the control group was 28.7±3mL/kg. In the slow and the fast infusion groups, it was 38.9±4.3 and 32.6±4.2mL/kg for albumin (p < 0.001), 32.9±4.3 and 29.5±4.4mL/kg for hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (p < 0.05), 31.8±3.9 and 28.2±4.1mL/kg for gelatin (p < 0.05), and 31.8±5.3 and 30.7±6.6mL/kg for NaCl (n.s), respectively.
The study showed that the PV expansion by a colloid was greater when given at a slow than at a fast infusion rate, an effect more pronounced for albumin. This difference was not seen for NaCl. The PV-expanding effect was poor for NaCl and better for albumin than for the other colloids.
比较在大鼠脓毒症模型中以快速输注率和缓慢输注率输注固定容量(5%白蛋白、合成胶体 6%羟乙基淀粉 130/0.4 和 4%明胶以及 0.9%氯化钠)对血浆容量(PV)的扩张效果,并比较这些液体之间的血浆扩张效果。
前瞻性、随机动物研究。
大学医院实验室。
112 只成年雄性大鼠。
盲肠结扎和切开后,诱导脓毒症,然后关闭腹部。3 小时后,以 12mL/kg 的体积开始输注研究中的 PV 扩张剂,对于胶体为 15 分钟,对于 0.9%氯化钠为 3 小时。对照组接受相同的实验程序,但不给任何液体。
输注开始后 3 小时(实验结束时),与快速输注相比,胶体(尤其是白蛋白)以缓慢输注率输注时具有更好的血浆扩张效果,但氯化钠组与对照组无显著差异。对照组的 PV 为 28.7±3mL/kg。在缓慢和快速输注组中,白蛋白的 PV 分别为 38.9±4.3 和 32.6±4.2mL/kg(p<0.001),羟乙基淀粉 130/0.4 的 PV 分别为 32.9±4.3 和 29.5±4.4mL/kg(p<0.05),明胶的 PV 分别为 31.8±3.9 和 28.2±4.1mL/kg(p<0.05),氯化钠的 PV 分别为 31.8±5.3 和 30.7±6.6mL/kg(无统计学意义)。
本研究表明,胶体以缓慢输注率输注时,PV 扩张效果大于快速输注率,白蛋白的这种效果更为明显。氯化钠没有这种差异。氯化钠的 PV 扩张效果较差,白蛋白的效果优于其他胶体。