• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大阿片类药物剂量与道路创伤风险:基于人群的研究。

Opioid dose and risk of road trauma in Canada: a population-based study.

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Feb 11;173(3):196-201. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.733.

DOI:10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.733
PMID:23318919
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of opioids may predispose drivers to road trauma, yet the effect of opioid dose on this association is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based nested case-control study of patients aged 18 to 64 years who received at least 1 publicly funded prescription for an opioid from April 1, 2003, through March 31, 2011. Cases were defined as having an emergency department visit related to road trauma. Patients without road trauma served as a control group matched to cases by age, sex, index year, prior road trauma, and a disease risk index. We compared the risk of road trauma among patients treated with doses of opioids ranging from very low to very high (<20 to ≥200 morphine equivalents daily). In a subgroup analysis, we stratified our analysis by driver status.

RESULTS

Among 549 878 eligible adults, we identified 5300 cases with road trauma and matched an equal number of controls. Multivariate adjustment yielded no significant association between escalating opioid dose and odds of road trauma (adjusted odds ratio ranged between 1.00 and 1.09). However, a significant association between opioid dose and road trauma was observed among drivers. Compared with very low opioid doses, drivers prescribed low doses had a 21% increased odds of road trauma (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02-1.42]); those prescribed moderate doses, 29% increased odds (1.29 [1.06-1.57]); those prescribed high doses, 42% increased odds (1.42 [1.15-1.76]); and those prescribed very high doses, 23% increased odds (1.23 [1.02-1.49]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among drivers prescribed opioids, a significant relationship exists between drug dose and risk of road trauma. This association is distinct and does not appear with passengers, pedestrians, and others injured in road trauma.

摘要

背景

使用阿片类药物可能使驾驶员容易发生道路创伤,但阿片类药物剂量对这种关联的影响尚不清楚。

方法

我们开展了一项基于人群的巢式病例对照研究,纳入了 2003 年 4 月 1 日至 2011 年 3 月 31 日期间年龄在 18 至 64 岁之间、至少接受过 1 次公共资金支付的阿片类药物处方的患者。病例定义为因道路创伤而到急诊就诊的患者。无道路创伤的患者作为对照组,通过年龄、性别、索引年、既往道路创伤和疾病风险指数与病例相匹配。我们比较了接受从极低剂量到极高剂量(<20 至≥200 吗啡当量/天)的阿片类药物治疗的患者发生道路创伤的风险。在亚组分析中,我们根据驾驶员状况对分析进行分层。

结果

在 549878 名符合条件的成年人中,我们共确定了 5300 例道路创伤病例和 5300 例匹配的对照组。多变量调整后,阿片类药物剂量的增加与道路创伤的几率之间无显著关联(调整后的比值比在 1.00 至 1.09 之间)。然而,在驾驶员中观察到阿片类药物剂量与道路创伤之间存在显著关联。与极低剂量的阿片类药物相比,低剂量处方的驾驶员发生道路创伤的几率增加了 21%(调整后的比值比,1.21[95%CI,1.02-1.42]);中剂量处方的驾驶员几率增加了 29%(1.29[1.06-1.57]);高剂量处方的驾驶员几率增加了 42%(1.42[1.15-1.76]);极高剂量处方的驾驶员几率增加了 23%(1.23[1.02-1.49])。

结论

在接受阿片类药物处方治疗的驾驶员中,药物剂量与道路创伤风险之间存在显著关系。这种关联是独特的,并且与其他因道路创伤而受伤的乘客、行人等不同。

相似文献

1
Opioid dose and risk of road trauma in Canada: a population-based study.加拿大阿片类药物剂量与道路创伤风险:基于人群的研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Feb 11;173(3):196-201. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.733.
2
Opioid dose and drug-related mortality in patients with nonmalignant pain.非恶性疼痛患者的阿片类药物剂量与药物相关死亡率
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Apr 11;171(7):686-91. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.117.
3
Gabapentin, opioids, and the risk of opioid-related death: A population-based nested case-control study.加巴喷丁、阿片类药物与阿片类药物相关死亡风险:一项基于人群的巢式病例对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 3;14(10):e1002396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002396. eCollection 2017 Oct.
4
The association between opioid analgesics and unsafe driving actions preceding fatal crashes.阿片类镇痛药与致命车祸前不安全驾驶行为之间的关联。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jan;42(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.06.030. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
5
Long-term analgesic use after low-risk surgery: a retrospective cohort study.低风险手术后的长期镇痛药物使用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 12;172(5):425-30. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1827.
6
Incidence and severity of head and neck injuries in victims of road traffic crashes: In an economically developed country.道路交通碰撞受害者头颈部损伤的发生率和严重程度:在一个经济发达国家。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jan;17(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
7
Road traffic crashes and prescribed methadone and buprenorphine: a French registry-based case-control study.道路交通事故与美沙酮和丁丙诺啡处方:一项基于法国登记处的病例对照研究。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Jun 1;123(1-3):91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.10.022. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
8
Prevalence and predictors of cognitive dysfunction in opioid-treated patients with cancer: a multinational study.癌症阿片类药物治疗患者认知功能障碍的流行率和预测因素:一项多国研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Apr 1;29(10):1297-303. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.6884. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
9
Opioid use for chronic low back pain: A prospective, population-based study among injured workers in Washington state, 2002-2005.慢性下背痛患者使用阿片类药物:2002-2005 年华盛顿州受伤工人的一项前瞻性、基于人群的研究。
Clin J Pain. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(9):743-51. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b01710.
10
Physicians' warnings for unfit drivers and the risk of trauma from road crashes.医生对不适合驾驶的司机的警告和道路碰撞造成创伤的风险。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 27;367(13):1228-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1114310.

引用本文的文献

1
Exceeding the guideline-recommended maximum daily dose of opioids for long-term treatment of non-cancer pain in Germany - a large retrospective observational study.在德国,长期治疗非癌性疼痛时,超过指南推荐的阿片类药物最大日剂量 - 一项大型回顾性观察研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2580. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20141-4.
2
Comparative Safety Analysis of Nabilone Versus Opioids: A Population-Based Cohort Study.纳布啡与阿片类药物的安全性比较:基于人群的队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(14):2716-2723. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08978-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
Patient Motivation to Reduce or Discontinue Opioids for Chronic Pain: Self-efficacy, Barriers, and Readiness to Change.
慢性疼痛患者减少或停用阿片类药物的动机:自我效能、障碍及改变的准备情况
Clin J Pain. 2024 Jan 1;40(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001167.
4
Between guidelines and clinical trials: evidence-based advice on the pharmacological management of non-specific chronic low back pain.在指南和临床试验之间:关于非特异性慢性下背痛药物治疗的循证建议。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 30;24(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06537-0.
5
Comparison of Different Modeling Approaches for Prescription Opioid Use and Its Association With Adverse Events.不同处方阿片类药物使用建模方法的比较及其与不良事件的关联。
Am J Epidemiol. 2023 Sep 1;192(9):1592-1603. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad115.
6
Do opioid prescriptions lead to fatal car crashes?阿片类药物处方会导致致命车祸吗?
Am J Health Econ. 2022 Summer;8(3):359-386. doi: 10.1086/718511. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
New opioid use and risk of opioid-related adverse events among adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省智力和发育障碍成年人中新发阿片类药物使用情况及阿片类药物相关不良事件风险
BJPsych Open. 2022 Nov 28;8(6):e208. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.612.
8
Trends in Prescription Opioid Use in Motor Vehicle Crash Injuries in the United States: 2014-2018.美国机动车事故伤害中处方阿片类药物使用趋势:2014-2018 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114445.
9
Association between prescribed opioid dose and risk of motor vehicle crashes.处方阿片类药物剂量与机动车事故风险的关联。
Pain. 2023 Apr 1;164(4):e228-e236. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002790. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
Predicting at-risk opioid use three months after ed visit for trauma: Results from the AURORA study.预测创伤急诊 3 个月后阿片类药物使用风险:AURORA 研究结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 23;17(9):e0273378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273378. eCollection 2022.