Yamaji Shunsuke, Demura Shinichi
University of Fukui, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Morphological and Physiological Sciences, Sports Medicine, Fukui, Japan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jul;94(7):1312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.021. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
To examine the reliability and fall experience discrimination of the Cross Step Moving on Four Spots Test (CSFT) and the relationship between CSFT and fall-related physical function.
The reliability of the CSFT was examined in a test-retest format with the same tester. Fall history, fall risk, fear of falling, activities of daily living (ADL), and various physical parameters were measured for all participants.
A community center and university medical school.
Elderly community-dwelling subjects (N=533; 62 men, 471 women) aged 65 to 94 years living independently.
Not applicable.
Time to complete all the CSFT steps required, fall risk score, ADL score, and fall-related physical function (isometric muscle strength: toe grip, plantar flexion, knee extension, hip flexion, hand grip; balance: 1-leg standing time with eyes open, functional reach test using an elastic stick; and gait: 10-m maximal walking speed).
The trial-to-trial reliability test indicated good reliability of the CSFT in both sexes (intraclass correlation coefficient =.833 in men, .825 in women). However, trial-to-trial errors increased with an increase in the CSFT values in both sexes. Significant correlations were observed between the CSFT values and scores for most fall-related physical function tests in both sexes. However, the correlation coefficient for all significant correlations was <0.5. Two-way analysis of variance (sex × fall experience) revealed that the fall experience is a significant factor affecting CSFT values; values in fallers were significantly lower than those in nonfallers. The odds ratios in logistic regression analysis were significant in both sexes (men, 1.35; women, 1.48). As determined by the Youden index, the optimal cutoff value for identifying fall experience was 7.32 seconds, with an area under the curve of .676.
The CSFT can detect fall experience and is useful in the evaluation of different fall-related physical functions including muscle strength, balance, and mobility.
检验四点交叉步移动测试(CSFT)的可靠性和跌倒经历辨别能力,以及CSFT与跌倒相关身体功能之间的关系。
由同一名测试者采用重测法检验CSFT的可靠性。测量所有参与者的跌倒史、跌倒风险、害怕跌倒程度、日常生活活动能力(ADL)以及各种身体参数。
一个社区中心和一所大学医学院。
年龄在65至94岁之间、独立生活的社区老年居民(N = 533;男性62名,女性471名)。
不适用。
完成所有CSFT步骤所需的时间、跌倒风险评分、ADL评分以及跌倒相关身体功能(等长肌力:足趾握力、跖屈、膝关节伸展、髋关节屈曲、手握力;平衡:睁眼单腿站立时间、使用弹性杆的功能性伸展测试;步态:10米最大步行速度)。
重测可靠性测试表明,CSFT在男女两性中均具有良好的可靠性(男性组内相关系数 = 0.833,女性组内相关系数 = 0.825)。然而,两性的重测误差均随CSFT值的增加而增加。两性的CSFT值与大多数跌倒相关身体功能测试得分之间均存在显著相关性。然而,所有显著相关性的相关系数均<0.5。双向方差分析(性别×跌倒经历)显示,跌倒经历是影响CSFT值的一个重要因素;跌倒者的CSFT值显著低于未跌倒者。逻辑回归分析中的优势比在男女两性中均具有显著性(男性为1.35,女性为1.48)。根据约登指数确定,识别跌倒经历的最佳截断值为7.32秒,曲线下面积为0.676。
CSFT能够检测跌倒经历,有助于评估包括肌力、平衡和活动能力在内的不同跌倒相关身体功能。