Suppr超能文献

脓毒症患者的通气策略。一项全国性观察性试验的结果。

Ventilatory strategies in septic patients. Results from a nationwide observational trial.

作者信息

Schädler D, Elke G, Engel C, Bogatsch H, Frerichs I, Kuhlen R, Rossaint R, Quintel M, Scholz J, Brunkhorst F M, Loeffler M, Reinhart K, Weiler N

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 12, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2013 Jan;62(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s00101-012-2121-2. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients is affected by multiple variables. The possible impact of the mode of ventilation has not yet been clarified; therefore, a secondary analysis of the "epidemiology of sepsis in Germany" study was performed. The aims were (1) to describe the ventilation strategies currently applied in clinical practice, (2) to analyze the association of the different modes of ventilation with mortality and (3) to investigate whether the ratio between arterial partial pressure of oxygen and inspired fraction of oxygen (PF ratio) and/or other respiratory variables are associated with mortality in septic patients needing ventilatory support.

METHODS

A total of 454 ICUs in 310 randomly selected hospitals participated in this national prospective observational 1-day point prevalence of sepsis study including 415 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock according to the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 415 patients, 331 required ventilatory support. Pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) was the most frequently used ventilatory mode (70.6 %) followed by assisted ventilation (AV 21.7 %) and volume controlled ventilation (VCV 7.7 %). Hospital mortality did not differ significantly among patients ventilated with PCV (57 %), VCV (71 %) or AV (51 %, p=0.23). A PF ratio equal or less than 300 mmHg was found in 83.2 % of invasively ventilated patients (n=316). In AV patients there was a clear trend to a higher PF ratio (204±70 mmHg) than in controlled ventilated patients (PCV 179±74 mmHg, VCV 175±75 mmHg, p=0.0551). Multiple regression analysis identified the tidal volume to pressure ratio (tidal volume divided by peak inspiratory airway pressure, odds ratio OR=0.94, 95 % confidence interval 95% CI=0.89-0.99), acute renal failure (OR=2.15, 95% CI=1.01-4.55) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score (OR=1.09, 95% CI=1.03-1.15) but not the PF ratio (univariate analysis OR=0.998, 95 % CI=0.995-1.001) as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This representative survey revealed that severe sepsis or septic shock was frequently associated with acute lung injury. Different ventilatory modes did not affect mortality. The tidal volume to inspiratory pressure ratio but not the PF ratio was independently associated with mortality.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡率受多种因素影响。通气模式的潜在影响尚未明确;因此,对“德国脓毒症流行病学”研究进行了二次分析。目的是:(1)描述目前临床实践中应用的通气策略;(2)分析不同通气模式与死亡率之间的关联;(3)研究动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数之比(PF比值)和/或其他呼吸变量是否与需要通气支持的脓毒症患者的死亡率相关。

方法

在310家随机选择的医院中,共有454个ICU参与了这项全国性前瞻性观察性脓毒症1天点患病率研究,纳入了415例符合美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会标准的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者。

结果

415例患者中,331例需要通气支持。压力控制通气(PCV)是最常用的通气模式(70.6%),其次是辅助通气(AV,21.7%)和容量控制通气(VCV,7.7%)。接受PCV通气的患者(57%)、VCV通气的患者(71%)和AV通气的患者(51%)的医院死亡率无显著差异(p = 0.23)。83.2%的有创通气患者(n = 316)的PF比值等于或小于300 mmHg。AV患者的PF比值(204±70 mmHg)明显高于控制通气患者(PCV为179±74 mmHg,VCV为175±75 mmHg,p = 0.0551)有明显趋势。多因素回归分析确定潮气量与压力比值(潮气量除以吸气峰压,比值比OR = 0.94,95%置信区间95%CI = 0.89 - 0.99)、急性肾衰竭(OR = 2.15,95%CI = 1.01 - 4.55)和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分(APACHE)II(OR = 1.09,95%CI = 1.03 - 1.15)而非PF比值(单因素分析OR = 0.998,95%CI = 0.995 - 1.001)是住院死亡率的独立危险因素。

结论

这项代表性调查显示,严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克常与急性肺损伤相关。不同的通气模式不影响死亡率。潮气量与吸气压力比值而非PF比值与死亡率独立相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验