Suppr超能文献

急性呼吸窘迫综合征:柏林定义。

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

出版信息

JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.

Abstract

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was defined in 1994 by the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC); since then, issues regarding the reliability and validity of this definition have emerged. Using a consensus process, a panel of experts convened in 2011 (an initiative of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine endorsed by the American Thoracic Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine) developed the Berlin Definition, focusing on feasibility, reliability, validity, and objective evaluation of its performance. A draft definition proposed 3 mutually exclusive categories of ARDS based on degree of hypoxemia: mild (200 mm Hg < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg), moderate (100 mm Hg < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 200 mm Hg), and severe (PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 100 mm Hg) and 4 ancillary variables for severe ARDS: radiographic severity, respiratory system compliance (≤40 mL/cm H2O), positive end-expiratory pressure (≥10 cm H2O), and corrected expired volume per minute (≥10 L/min). The draft Berlin Definition was empirically evaluated using patient-level meta-analysis of 4188 patients with ARDS from 4 multicenter clinical data sets and 269 patients with ARDS from 3 single-center data sets containing physiologic information. The 4 ancillary variables did not contribute to the predictive validity of severe ARDS for mortality and were removed from the definition. Using the Berlin Definition, stages of mild, moderate, and severe ARDS were associated with increased mortality (27%; 95% CI, 24%-30%; 32%; 95% CI, 29%-34%; and 45%; 95% CI, 42%-48%, respectively; P < .001) and increased median duration of mechanical ventilation in survivors (5 days; interquartile [IQR], 2-11; 7 days; IQR, 4-14; and 9 days; IQR, 5-17, respectively; P < .001). Compared with the AECC definition, the final Berlin Definition had better predictive validity for mortality, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.577 (95% CI, 0.561-0.593) vs 0.536 (95% CI, 0.520-0.553; P < .001). This updated and revised Berlin Definition for ARDS addresses a number of the limitations of the AECC definition. The approach of combining consensus discussions with empirical evaluation may serve as a model to create more accurate, evidence-based, critical illness syndrome definitions and to better inform clinical care, research, and health services planning.

摘要

急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)于 1994 年由美国-欧洲共识会议(AECC)定义;此后,该定义的可靠性和有效性问题不断出现。一个专家组于 2011 年通过共识进程(这是欧洲重症监护医学学会的一项倡议,得到了美国胸科学会和重症监护医学学会的认可)制定了柏林定义,重点关注其性能的可行性、可靠性、有效性和客观评估。该草案定义基于低氧血症程度提出了 3 个相互排斥的 ARDS 类别:轻度(200mmHg < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 300mmHg)、中度(100mmHg < PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 200mmHg)和重度(PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 100mmHg),以及 4 个重度 ARDS 的辅助变量:影像学严重程度、呼吸系统顺应性(≤40mL/cmH2O)、呼气末正压(≥10cmH2O)和分钟校正呼气量(≥10L/min)。该草案柏林定义使用来自 4 个多中心临床数据集的 4188 名 ARDS 患者和来自 3 个包含生理信息的单中心数据集的 269 名 ARDS 患者的患者水平荟萃分析进行了实证评估。这 4 个辅助变量对死亡率的重度 ARDS 预测没有贡献,因此从定义中删除。使用柏林定义,轻度、中度和重度 ARDS 阶段与死亡率增加相关(27%;95%CI,24%-30%;32%;95%CI,29%-34%;45%;95%CI,42%-48%;P < 0.001),并且存活者的机械通气中位持续时间增加(5 天;四分位距[IQR],2-11;7 天;IQR,4-14;9 天;IQR,5-17;P < 0.001)。与 AECC 定义相比,最终的柏林定义对死亡率的预测具有更好的有效性,其接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.577(95%CI,0.561-0.593),而 AECC 定义为 0.536(95%CI,0.520-0.553;P < 0.001)。这个更新和修订的 ARDS 柏林定义解决了 AECC 定义的一些局限性。结合共识讨论和实证评估的方法可能成为创建更准确、基于证据的危重病综合征定义的模型,并为临床护理、研究和卫生服务规划提供更好的信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验