• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国睡眠医学学会再评分者可靠性方案:睡眠分期。

The American Academy of Sleep Medicine inter-scorer reliability program: sleep stage scoring.

机构信息

American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Darien, IL 60561, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Jan 15;9(1):81-7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2350.

DOI:10.5664/jcsm.2350
PMID:23319910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3525994/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The program provides a unique opportunity to compare a large number of scorers with varied levels of experience to determine sleep stage scoring agreement. The objective is to examine areas of disagreement to inform future revisions of the AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events.

METHODS

The sample included 9 record fragments, 1,800 epochs and more than 3,200,000 scoring decisions. More than 2,500 scorers, most with 3 or more years of experience, participated. The analysis determined agreement with the score chosen by the majority of scorers.

RESULTS

Sleep stage agreement averaged 82.6%. Agreement was highest for stage R sleep with stages N2 and W approaching the same level. Scoring agreement for stage N3 sleep was 67.4% and was lowest for stage N1 at 63.0%. Scorers had particular difficulty with the last epoch of stage W before sleep onset, the first epoch of stage N2 after stage N1 and the first epoch of stage R after stage N2. Discrimination between stages N2 and N3 was particularly difficult for scorers.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that with current rules, inter-scorer agreement in a large group is approximately 83%, a level similar to that reported for agreement between expert scorers. Agreement in the scoring of stages N1 and N3 sleep was low. Modifications to the scoring rules to improve scoring during sleep stage transitions may result in improvement.

摘要

研究目的

该项目提供了一个独特的机会,可以比较大量具有不同经验水平的评分者,以确定睡眠分期评分的一致性。目的是检查意见不一致的领域,为未来修订《睡眠和相关事件的 AASM 手册》提供信息。

方法

样本包括 9 个记录片段、1800 个时相和超过 3200000 个评分决策。有 2500 多名评分者参与,他们大多有 3 年以上的经验。分析确定了与大多数评分者选择的评分的一致性。

结果

睡眠分期的平均一致性为 82.6%。R 期睡眠的一致性最高,N2 和 W 期接近相同水平。N3 期睡眠的评分一致性为 67.4%,N1 期睡眠的评分一致性最低,为 63.0%。评分者在睡眠开始前的 W 期最后一个时相、N1 期后第一个 N2 期和 N2 期后第一个 R 期时特别难以确定。N2 和 N3 期之间的区分对评分者来说特别困难。

结论

这些发现表明,在当前规则下,大量评分者之间的组内一致性约为 83%,与专家评分者之间的一致性水平相似。N1 和 N3 期睡眠的评分一致性较低。对评分规则进行修改以改善睡眠分期过渡期间的评分可能会有所改善。

相似文献

1
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine inter-scorer reliability program: sleep stage scoring.美国睡眠医学学会再评分者可靠性方案:睡眠分期。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2013 Jan 15;9(1):81-7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.2350.
2
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine Inter-scorer Reliability program: respiratory events.美国睡眠医学学会评分者间可靠性方案:呼吸事件。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2014 Apr 15;10(4):447-54. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.3630.
3
Interrater agreement between American and Chinese sleep centers according to the 2014 AASM standard.中美睡眠中心之间根据 2014 年 AASM 标准的一致性。
Sleep Breath. 2019 Jun;23(2):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01801-x. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
4
Staging Sleep in Polysomnograms: Analysis of Inter-Scorer Variability.多导睡眠图中的睡眠分期:评分者间变异性分析
J Clin Sleep Med. 2016 Jun 15;12(6):885-94. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.5894.
5
Process and outcome for international reliability in sleep scoring.睡眠评分国际可靠性的过程与结果
Sleep Breath. 2015 Mar;19(1):191-5. doi: 10.1007/s11325-014-0990-0. Epub 2014 May 7.
6
Interrater reliability of sleep stage scoring: a meta-analysis.睡眠分期评分的组内信度:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):193-202. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9538.
7
Reliability of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Rules for Assessing Sleep Depth in Clinical Practice.美国睡眠医学学会评估临床睡眠深度规则的可靠性。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Feb 15;14(2):205-213. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6934.
8
Multicentre sleep-stage scoring agreement in the Sleep Revolution project.多中心睡眠分期评分在睡眠革命项目中的一致性。
J Sleep Res. 2024 Feb;33(1):e13956. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13956. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
9
The 2007 AASM recommendations for EEG electrode placement in polysomnography: impact on sleep and cortical arousal scoring.2007 年 AASM 关于多导睡眠图中脑电图电极放置的建议:对睡眠和皮质唤醒评分的影响。
Sleep. 2011 Jan 1;34(1):73-81. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.1.73.
10
Interobserver agreement among sleep scorers from different centers in a large dataset.大型数据集中不同中心的睡眠评分者之间的观察者间一致性。
Sleep. 2000 Nov 1;23(7):901-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic functional MRI markers of drowsiness during sleep onset period.睡眠开始期嗜睡的动态功能磁共振成像标志物
iScience. 2025 Jul 10;28(8):113088. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113088. eCollection 2025 Aug 15.
2
Beyond accuracy: a framework for evaluating algorithmic bias and performance, applied to automated sleep scoring.超越准确性:评估算法偏差与性能的框架,应用于自动睡眠评分
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21421. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06019-4.
3
Convenient characterization of sleep EEG in persons at risk or with cognitive decline: realization of a dream?对有风险或认知能力下降者的睡眠脑电图进行便捷表征:梦想成真?
Sleep. 2025 Aug 14;48(8). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaf154.
4
Sleep Identification Enabled by Supervised Training Algorithms (SIESTA): An Open-Source Platform for Automatic Sleep Staging of Rodent Electrocorticographic and Electromyographic Data.通过监督训练算法实现的睡眠识别(SIESTA):用于啮齿动物脑电图和肌电图数据自动睡眠分期的开源平台。
J Biol Rhythms. 2025 Aug;40(4):330-346. doi: 10.1177/07487304251336649. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
5
Unraveling the interplay between sleep, redox metabolism, and aging: implications for brain health and longevity.解析睡眠、氧化还原代谢与衰老之间的相互作用:对大脑健康和长寿的影响。
Front Aging. 2025 May 21;6:1605070. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2025.1605070. eCollection 2025.
6
Virtual Electroencephalogram Acquisition: A Review on Electroencephalogram Generative Methods.虚拟脑电图采集:脑电图生成方法综述
Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 18;25(10):3178. doi: 10.3390/s25103178.
7
Efficacy and Tolerability of a Chemically Characterized L. Extract-Based Food Supplement for Sleep Management: A Single-Center, Controlled, Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.一种基于化学特性明确的L.提取物的睡眠管理食品补充剂的疗效和耐受性:一项单中心、对照、随机、交叉、双盲临床试验。
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 28;17(9):1491. doi: 10.3390/nu17091491.
8
Artificial intelligence in pediatric sleep staging: a new era or a complementary tool?人工智能在儿科睡眠分期中的应用:新时代还是辅助工具?
Sleep. 2025 Jul 11;48(7). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsaf067.
9
Effects of wakeful rest on memory consolidation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.清醒休息对记忆巩固的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02665-x.
10
A continuous approach to explain insomnia and subjective-objective sleep discrepancy.一种解释失眠及主观-客观睡眠差异的连贯方法。
Commun Biol. 2025 Mar 12;8(1):423. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-07794-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The AASM Scoring Manual four years later.《AASM 评分手册》四周年纪念版。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Jun 15;8(3):323-32. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1928.
2
The 2007 AASM recommendations for EEG electrode placement in polysomnography: impact on sleep and cortical arousal scoring.2007 年 AASM 关于多导睡眠图中脑电图电极放置的建议:对睡眠和皮质唤醒评分的影响。
Sleep. 2011 Jan 1;34(1):73-81. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.1.73.
3
Interrater reliability for sleep scoring according to the Rechtschaffen & Kales and the new AASM standard.根据 Rechtschaffen & Kales 标准和新的美国睡眠医学学会(AASM)标准进行睡眠评分的评分者间信度。
J Sleep Res. 2009 Mar;18(1):74-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00700.x.
4
Sleep classification according to AASM and Rechtschaffen & Kales: effects on sleep scoring parameters.根据美国睡眠医学学会(AASM)以及 Rechtschaffen 和 Kales 的标准进行睡眠分类:对睡眠评分参数的影响。
Sleep. 2009 Feb;32(2):139-49. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.2.139.
5
The visual scoring of sleep in adults.成人睡眠的视觉评分
J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Mar 15;3(2):121-31.
6
From slow waves to sleep homeostasis: new perspectives.从慢波到睡眠稳态:新视角
Arch Ital Biol. 2001 Feb;139(1-2):53-61.
7
Interobserver agreement among sleep scorers from different centers in a large dataset.大型数据集中不同中心的睡眠评分者之间的观察者间一致性。
Sleep. 2000 Nov 1;23(7):901-8.