• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography assessment of gastric cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.对比增强超声造影评估胃癌新辅助化疗的反应。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 21;18(47):7026-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i47.7026.
2
Usefulness of CT volumetry for primary gastric lesions in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.CT容积测量法对原发性胃病变在预测晚期胃癌新辅助化疗病理反应中的应用价值。
Abdom Imaging. 2009 Jul;34(4):430-40. doi: 10.1007/s00261-008-9420-8.
3
Role of dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with local advanced rectal cancer.动态灌注磁共振成像在局部进展期直肠癌患者中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 May 28;26(20):2657-2668. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2657.
4
Locally advanced gastric cancer: total iodine uptake to predict the response of primary lesion to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.局部进展期胃癌:总碘摄取量预测新辅助化疗对原发病灶的反应。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;144(11):2207-2218. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2728-z. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
5
[Value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound QontraXt three-dimensional pseudocolor quantitative analysis to therapeutic effect evaluation of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer patients].[双对比增强超声QontraXt三维伪彩色定量分析对进展期胃癌患者术前新辅助化疗疗效评估的价值]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 23;40(11):857-863. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.11.012.
6
Adapted Choi response criteria for prediction of clinical outcome in locally advanced gastric cancer patients following preoperative chemotherapy.改良Choi反应标准用于预测局部晚期胃癌患者术前化疗后的临床结局
Acta Radiol. 2012 Mar 1;53(2):127-34. doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110273. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
7
Double contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography for evaluation of gastric lesions.双对比增强二维和三维超声用于胃病变的评估。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 21;18(31):4136-44. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i31.4136.
8
Spectral CT vs. diffusion-weighted imaging for the quantitative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.光谱 CT 与弥散加权成像对局部进展期胃癌新辅助化疗病理反应的定量预测价值比较。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Sep;34(9):6193-6204. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10642-6. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
9
Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT - RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0.CT 和 FDG-PET/CT 评估食管癌患者新辅助化疗的肿瘤反应:RECIST 1.1 与 PERCIST 1.0 比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr;101:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
10
Sequential FDG-PET/CT reliably predicts response of locally advanced rectal cancer to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy.序贯氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)能够可靠地预测局部晚期直肠癌对新辅助放化疗的反应。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Oct;34(10):1583-93. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0426-1. Epub 2007 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
An ultrasound based method for predicting the malignant potential of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors preoperatively.一种基于超声的方法,用于术前预测原发性胃肠道间质瘤的恶性潜能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Dec;49(12):4189-4197. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04341-5. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
2
Deep learning or radiomics based on CT for predicting the response of gastric cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.基于CT的深度学习或影像组学预测胃癌对新辅助化疗反应的Meta分析和系统评价
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 27;14:1363812. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1363812. eCollection 2024.
3
Imaging advances in efficacy assessment of gastric cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy.胃癌新辅助化疗疗效评估的影像学进展。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Dec;48(12):3661-3676. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04046-1. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
4
Preoperative diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes by CT-histopathologic matching analysis in gastric adenocarcinoma using dual-layer spectral detector CT.使用双层光谱探测器CT通过CT-组织病理学匹配分析对胃腺癌转移性淋巴结进行术前诊断。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Dec;33(12):8948-8956. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09875-8. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
5
Response Evaluation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer.可切除胃癌新辅助化疗后的疗效评估
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 15;15(8):2318. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082318.
6
Preoperative diagnosis of tumor depth in gastric cancer using transabdominal ultrasonography compared to using endoscopy and computed tomography.经腹超声与内镜和 CT 比较用于胃癌术前肿瘤深度诊断。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3807-3813. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09883-1. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
7
Preoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Phase II Randomized Study.局部晚期胃癌术前同步放化疗与新辅助化疗的比较:II期随机研究
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 29;12:870741. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.870741. eCollection 2022.
8
Treatment Switch in Poor Responders with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后局部进展期胃癌低反应者的治疗转换。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8892-8907. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10087-x. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
9
Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.胃癌新辅助治疗的现状与未来展望
Chin J Cancer Res. 2021 Apr 30;33(2):181-192. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.02.06.
10
The Sensitivity Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer.胃癌新辅助化疗的敏感性预测
Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 16;11:641304. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641304. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Response evaluation of chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer by contrast enhanced ultrasound.对比增强超声在转移性结直肠癌化疗中的疗效评价。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb 14;18(6):541-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i6.541.
2
Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography evaluation of preoperative Lauren classification of advanced gastric carcinoma.术前双对比增强超声对进展期胃癌 Lauren 分类的评估。
Arch Med Sci. 2011 Apr;7(2):287-93. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2011.22080. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX: improved outcomes in Chinese patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.FOLFOX 新辅助化疗:改善中国局部晚期胃癌患者的结局。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun 15;105(8):793-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.23009. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
4
Phase II trial of preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 for T4 locally advanced gastric cancer.术前化疗联合多西他赛、顺铂和 S-1 治疗 T4 局部进展期胃癌的 II 期临床试验。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb;42(2):131-3. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyr183. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
5
Clinicopathologic variables predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.预测局部进展期胃癌患者新辅助化疗肿瘤反应的临床病理变量。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;105(3):293-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.22085. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
6
Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison to endoscopic ultrasonography with respect to histopathology.双对比增强超声检查用于胃癌术前评估:与内镜超声检查的组织病理学比较。
Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):605-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.033. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
7
Sequential FDG-PET and induction chemotherapy in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the Oesophago-gastric junction (AEG): the Heidelberg Imaging program in Cancer of the oesophago-gastric junction during Neoadjuvant treatment: HICON trial.序贯 FDG-PET 和新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG):海德堡食管胃结合部癌新辅助治疗影像学研究计划:HICON 试验。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jun 24;11:266. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-266.
8
Imaging assessment of tumor response: past, present and future.肿瘤反应的影像学评估:过去、现在和未来。
Future Oncol. 2011 May;7(5):669-77. doi: 10.2217/fon.11.38.
9
Contrast-enhanced gray-scale ultrasound for quantitative evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy: preliminary results with a mouse hepatoma model.超声造影灰阶强度定量分析评价化疗后肿瘤变化的初步研究——以小鼠肝癌模型为例
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):W13-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4734.
10
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954.新辅助化疗对比单纯手术治疗局部进展期胃和胃食管交界腺癌:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织 40954 随机临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5210-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.6114. Epub 2010 Nov 8.

对比增强超声造影评估胃癌新辅助化疗的反应。

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography assessment of gastric cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 21;18(47):7026-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i47.7026.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v18.i47.7026
PMID:23323004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3531690/
Abstract

AIM

To quantitatively assess the ability of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCUS) to detect tumor early response to pre-operative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative resection between September 2011 and February 2012 were analyzed. Pre-operative chemotherapy regimens of fluorouracil + oxaliplatin or S-1 + oxaliplatin were administered in 2-4 cycles over 6-12 wk periods. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan and DCUS before and after two courses of pre-operative chemotherapy. The therapeutic response was assessed by CT using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1) criteria. Tumor area was assessed by DCUS as enhanced appearance of gastric carcinoma due to tumor vascularity during the contrast phase as compared to the normal gastric wall. Histopathologic analysis was carried out according to the Mandard tumor regression grade criteria and used as the reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of DCUS parameters in differentiating histopathological responders from non-responders.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 32 men and 11 women, with mean age of 59.7 ± 11.4 years. Neither age, sex, histologic type, tumor site, T stage, nor N stage was associated with pathological response. The responders had significantly smaller mean tumor size than the non-responders (15.7 ± 7.4 cm vs 33.3 ± 14.1 cm, P < 0.01). According to Mandard's criteria, 27 patients were classified as responders, with 11 (40.7%) showing decreased tumor size by DCUS. In contrast, only three (18.8%) of the 16 non-responders showed decreased tumor size by DCUS (P < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve was 0.64, with a 95%CI of 0.46-0.81. The effects of several cut-off points on diagnostic parameters were calculated in the ROC curve analysis. By maximizing Youden's index (sensitivity + specificity - 1), the best cut-off point for distinguishing responders from non-responders was determined, which had optimal sensitivity of 62.9% and specificity of 56.3%. Using this cut-off point, the positive and negative predictive values of DCUS for distinguishing responders from non-responders were 70.8% and 47.4%, respectively. The overall accuracy of DCUS for therapeutic response assessment was 60.5%, slightly higher than the 53.5% for CT response assessment with RECIST criteria (P = 0.663). Although the advantage was not statistically significant, likely due to the small number of cases assessed. DCUS was able to identify decreased perfusion in responders who showed no morphological change by CT imaging, which can be occluded by such treatment effects as fibrosis and edema.

CONCLUSION

DCUS may represent an innovative tool for more accurately predicting histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgical resection in patients with locally-advanced gastric cancer.

摘要

目的

定量评估双对比增强超声(DCUS)检测胃癌患者术前化疗早期肿瘤反应的能力。

方法

分析 2011 年 9 月至 2012 年 2 月期间接受新辅助化疗后行根治性切除术的 43 例胃癌患者。氟尿嘧啶+奥沙利铂或 S-1+奥沙利铂的术前化疗方案在 6-12 周内进行 2-4 个周期。所有患者均在术前化疗前和后进行增强 CT 扫描和 DCUS 检查。采用实体瘤反应评价标准(RECIST 1.1)评估治疗反应。通过 DCUS 评估,由于肿瘤血管,对比期胃腺癌的增强外观与正常胃壁相比。根据 Mandard 肿瘤消退分级标准进行组织病理学分析,并作为参考标准。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估 DCUS 参数在区分组织病理学反应者与非反应者方面的有效性。

结果

研究人群包括 32 名男性和 11 名女性,平均年龄为 59.7±11.4 岁。年龄、性别、组织学类型、肿瘤部位、T 分期和 N 分期均与病理反应无关。反应者的平均肿瘤大小明显小于非反应者(15.7±7.4cm 与 33.3±14.1cm,P<0.01)。根据 Mandard 标准,27 例患者被归类为反应者,其中 11 例(40.7%)通过 DCUS 显示肿瘤大小减小。相比之下,仅 16 例非反应者中的 3 例(18.8%)通过 DCUS 显示肿瘤大小减小(P<0.01)。ROC 曲线下面积为 0.64,95%CI 为 0.46-0.81。在 ROC 曲线分析中计算了几个截断点对诊断参数的影响。通过最大化 Youden 指数(灵敏度+特异性-1),确定了区分反应者和非反应者的最佳截断点,其具有最佳的 62.9%的灵敏度和 56.3%的特异性。使用该截断点,DCUS 区分反应者和非反应者的阳性和阴性预测值分别为 70.8%和 47.4%。DCUS 对治疗反应评估的总体准确性为 60.5%,略高于 RECIST 标准的 CT 反应评估的 53.5%(P=0.663)。虽然优势并不具有统计学意义,但可能是由于评估的病例数量较少。DCUS 能够识别出在 CT 成像显示无形态变化的反应者中灌注减少的情况,这种情况可能被纤维化和水肿等治疗效果所阻断。

结论

DCUS 可能是一种新的工具,可在局部进展期胃癌患者行手术切除前更准确地预测新辅助化疗的组织病理学反应。