Suppr超能文献

大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术与射频消融术治疗静脉曲张的前瞻性非随机对照研究:生活质量及复发率比较

Prospective nonrandomized comparison of quality of life and recurrence between high ligation and stripping and radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins.

作者信息

Park Hyung Sub, Kwon Yujin, Eom Bang Wool, Lee Taeseung

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Jan;84(1):48-56. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.1.48. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Varicose veins are a major problem worldwide and improvement in quality of life (QoL) is the ultimate goal after treatment of this benign disease. However QoL is highly dependent on personal and social factors. This study compares high ligation and stripping (HS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in terms of QoL and recurrence in Korea.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data between August 2006 and October 2008 was performed for patients undergoing HS and RFA at a single institution. QoL was assessed with a questionnaire preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. Recurrence was assessed by Duplex ultrasound annually after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 272 patients completed the questionnaire at 3 months. Among these patients, 155 patients returned for their annual follow-up. There were no significant differences between HS and RFA in global QoL scores, although RFA showed less pain. However, paresthesia rates were also higher after RFA. Recurrence rates were similar between the two modalities, although technical failures were more common after RFA.

CONCLUSION

Overall QoL and recurrence rates were similar between the two modalities. The benefits of RFA do not seem to be enough to overcome the higher costs of HS in Korea.

摘要

目的

静脉曲张是全球范围内的一个主要问题,改善生活质量(QoL)是治疗这种良性疾病后的最终目标。然而,生活质量高度依赖于个人和社会因素。本研究在韩国比较了高位结扎剥脱术(HS)和射频消融术(RFA)在生活质量和复发方面的情况。

方法

对2006年8月至2008年10月期间在单一机构接受HS和RFA治疗的患者进行前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。术前、术后3个月及此后每年用问卷评估生活质量。术后每年用双功超声评估复发情况。

结果

共有272例患者在术后3个月完成了问卷。在这些患者中,155例患者返回进行年度随访。HS和RFA在总体生活质量评分上无显著差异,尽管RFA的疼痛较轻。然而,RFA后的感觉异常发生率也较高。两种方式的复发率相似,尽管RFA后的技术失败更常见。

结论

两种方式的总体生活质量和复发率相似。在韩国,RFA的优势似乎不足以克服HS更高的成本。

相似文献

2
Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus open surgery for great saphenous vein varices.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 30(7):CD005624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub3.

本文引用的文献

2
Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgery for great saphenous vein varices.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD005624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005624.pub2.
5
International psychometric validation of the Chronic Venous Disease quality of life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20).
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Dec;40(6):783-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.03.034. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
8
Radiofrequency ablation vs conventional surgery for varicose veins - a comparison of treatment costs in a randomised trial.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Jan;39(1):104-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.09.012. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
9
Optimization of intravascular shear stress assessment in vivo.
J Biomech. 2009 Jul 22;42(10):1429-1437. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.021. Epub 2009 May 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验