• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盈利:审视底线。

For profits: a look at the bottom line.

作者信息

Fein R

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 1990 Spring;11(1):49-61.

PMID:2332491
Abstract

This paper examines the expansion of for-profit health care organizations, focusing on hospitals. It argues that much of the support of for-profits derives from American market ideology and the assumption that the search for profits leads to efficiency in production. In the health field, there is no evidence, however, that such gains in efficiency exist or that, if they do, they are shared with patients in the form of lower costs of care or with employees in the form of higher wages. The paper presents a number of reasons for concluding that for-profits would not serve the needs of patients, care deliverers, local communities, or the health care system. Potential efficiency gains, even if realized, would be far outweighed by the damage that for-profits would cause.

摘要

本文考察了营利性医疗保健机构的扩张情况,重点关注医院。文章认为,对营利性机构的诸多支持源自美国的市场意识形态以及一种假设,即追求利润会带来生产效率。然而,在医疗领域,并无证据表明存在这种效率提升,或者即便存在,也没有以降低医疗成本的形式让患者受益,或以提高工资的形式让员工受益。本文提出了若干理由,以说明营利性机构无法满足患者、医疗服务提供者、当地社区或医疗保健系统的需求。即便实现了潜在的效率提升,营利性机构造成的损害也会远远超过这些收益。

相似文献

1
For profits: a look at the bottom line.盈利:审视底线。
J Public Health Policy. 1990 Spring;11(1):49-61.
2
New dawn for not-for-profit providers.
Health Prog. 1986 Oct;67(8):58-60.
3
Does the profit motive make Jack nimble? Ownership form and the evolution of the US hospital industry.利润动机能让杰克变得灵活吗?所有制形式与美国医院行业的演变。
Health Econ. 2006 Apr;15(4):345-61. doi: 10.1002/hec.1111.
4
Medicine and profits: unhealthy mixture?医药与利润:不良组合?
US News World Rep. 1981 Aug 17;91(7):50-4.
5
Study fails to prove for-profits' superiority.研究未能证明营利性机构的优越性。
Health Prog. 1987 Apr;68(3):32-7.
6
An uphill struggle for marketshare. The for-profit healthcare chains, 1987.争夺市场份额的艰苦斗争。营利性医疗保健连锁机构,1987年。
Food Manage. 1987 Nov;22(11):100-13, 193-4.
7
Nonprofit conversion: theory, evidence, and state policy options.非营利性转变:理论、证据及国家政策选择
Health Serv Res. 1998 Dec;33(5 Pt 2):1495-535.
8
Point-counterpoint. Not-for-profits vs. for-profits: is one better for patient care? Valuable societal functions for which there is no economic market.
Health Syst Lead. 1997 Aug-Sep;4(8):14-5.
9
For-profit ownership of facilities would lead to a more efficient health care system.医疗机构的营利性所有权将带来一个更高效的医疗保健系统。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Oct;8(4):253-4. doi: 10.1258/135581903322403353.
10
Who really profits from not-for-profits?非营利组织究竟谁真正获利?
Health Serv Res. 1990 Jun;25(2):291-304.