Suppr超能文献

医疗保险受益人群腰椎狭窄症减压手术后的再入院率。

Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):591-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828628f5.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort analysis of administrative claims.

OBJECTIVE

Estimate readmission rates after spine stenosis decompression surgery in a 5% randomly selected sample of Medicare beneficiaries.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis has significant and measurable benefits compared with nonoperative care. Revision rates for lumbar decompression with and without fusion have been reported with significant variability. An understanding of readmission and reoperation rates informs decisions regarding the cost-effective management of lumbar stenosis.

METHODS

Patients were identified in 2005-2009 Medicare claims who had both a procedure code for decompression (03.09), and a diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (724.02). Patients diagnosed with spondylolisthesis, and those receiving revision surgery or fusion of more than 3 segments were excluded. Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to estimate univariate rates of readmission for fusion, decompression, or injection and Cox proportional hazards to examine whether fusion decreased the likelihood of readmission.

RESULTS

The overall 1-year readmission rate was slightly higher in patients undergoing fusion with decompression (9.7%) than patients who underwent decompression alone (7.2%, P = 0.03). Rates at 2 years were 14.6% and 12.5%, respectively. Patients receiving decompression with fusion were slightly younger and more likely female. Procedures performed during readmission were similar for the fusion and no fusion cohorts with 56% receiving fusion, 23% decompression, and 22% injection for pain management. Of the patients who were not readmitted, more than 25% of patients received outpatient injections for pain management during the 3-month quarter of their surgery and approximately 20% in the subsequent quarter.

CONCLUSION

Readmission rates for spinal stenosis decompression were approximately 8% to 10% per year. Fusion at the index procedure did not protect against subsequent readmission. Large databases can inform choice of surgical options by focusing examination on indications for surgery and reasons for readmission. Fusion along with decompression does not seem to impact readmission rates.

摘要

研究设计

对医疗保险受益人的 5%随机抽样进行行政索赔回顾性观察队列分析。

目的

在腰椎管狭窄减压手术的 5%随机抽样中估计再入院率。

背景资料摘要

与非手术治疗相比,腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗具有显著和可衡量的益处。已经报道了腰椎减压伴或不伴融合的翻修率存在显著差异。了解再入院和再次手术率可以为腰椎管狭窄症的经济有效管理提供决策依据。

方法

从 2005 年至 2009 年的医疗保险索赔中确定既接受减压手术(03.09),又诊断为腰椎管狭窄症(724.02)的患者。排除有脊椎滑脱症诊断和接受翻修手术或融合超过 3 个节段的患者。使用 Kaplan-Meier 乘积限法估计融合、减压或注射的单变量再入院率,使用 Cox 比例风险检验来检查融合是否降低了再入院的可能性。

结果

接受融合减压的患者在 1 年内的总体再入院率(9.7%)略高于仅接受减压的患者(7.2%,P = 0.03)。2 年时的比率分别为 14.6%和 12.5%。接受融合减压的患者年龄稍小,女性比例稍高。在融合和非融合队列中,再入院时的手术程序相似,56%的患者接受融合,23%的患者接受减压,22%的患者接受注射以进行疼痛管理。在未再入院的患者中,超过 25%的患者在手术的 3 个月季度接受门诊注射以进行疼痛管理,约有 20%的患者在随后的季度接受注射。

结论

腰椎管狭窄减压术后的再入院率约为每年 8%至 10%。指数手术时的融合并不能防止随后的再入院。大型数据库可以通过关注手术适应证和再入院原因来为手术选择提供信息。融合加减压似乎不会影响再入院率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验