Suppr超能文献

克鲁赞诉哈蒙案以及奥康纳事件。两个反常情况。

Cruzan v Harmon, and In the Matter of O'Connor. Two anomalies.

作者信息

Gasner M R

机构信息

Society for the Right to Die, Inc, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 May;38(5):594-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb02414.x.

Abstract

Two recent court cases, Cruzan v Harmon and In the Matter of O'Connor, denied family requests to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. The facts of the cases are discussed, as well as the impact on medical practice for physicians in Missouri and New York. Approaches of other state courts are pointed out. While critical of the judicial reasoning in both cases, the article provides guidance to doctors about how to work within the court decisions and still honor patient wishes.

摘要

最近的两起法庭案件,即克鲁赞诉哈蒙案和奥康纳案,驳回了家属提出的拒绝或停止维持生命治疗的请求。文中讨论了这两起案件的事实,以及对密苏里州和纽约州医生医疗实践的影响。还指出了其他州法院的处理方式。尽管该文章对这两起案件的司法推理持批评态度,但它为医生提供了如何在法庭判决范围内行事同时仍尊重患者意愿的指导。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验