Gasner M R
Society for the Right to Die, Inc, New York, NY.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 May;38(5):594-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb02414.x.
Two recent court cases, Cruzan v Harmon and In the Matter of O'Connor, denied family requests to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. The facts of the cases are discussed, as well as the impact on medical practice for physicians in Missouri and New York. Approaches of other state courts are pointed out. While critical of the judicial reasoning in both cases, the article provides guidance to doctors about how to work within the court decisions and still honor patient wishes.
最近的两起法庭案件,即克鲁赞诉哈蒙案和奥康纳案,驳回了家属提出的拒绝或停止维持生命治疗的请求。文中讨论了这两起案件的事实,以及对密苏里州和纽约州医生医疗实践的影响。还指出了其他州法院的处理方式。尽管该文章对这两起案件的司法推理持批评态度,但它为医生提供了如何在法庭判决范围内行事同时仍尊重患者意愿的指导。