Suppr超能文献

头孢泊肟酯与环丙沙星治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎急性发作的有效性和安全性比较:一项随机、开放标签的IV期临床试验。

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of cefpodoxime and ciprofloxacin in acute exacerbation of chronic suppurative otitis media: A randomized, open-labeled, phase IV clinical trial.

作者信息

Ghosh Arijit, Jana Utpal, Khaowas Ajoy, Das Saumik, Mandal Ananya, Das Nina

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Nilratan Sircar Medical College, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012 Oct;3(4):320-4. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.103689.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of cefpodoxime and ciprofloxacin for the treatment of mild to moderate cases of acute exacerbation of chronic suppurative otitis media (AECSOM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with AECSOM were screened and patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomized to receive either cefpodoxime 200 mg twice daily or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily orally for 7 days. The primary outcome of this randomized, open-labeled, phase IV clinical trial (Registration Number - CTRI/2011/10/002079) was clinical success rate at day 14 visit and the secondary outcome was incidence of adverse events (AEs). Forty-six patients were enrolled: 23 in the cefpodoxime group and 23 in the ciprofloxacin group.

RESULTS

The clinical success rates were 95.6% in the cefpodoxime group versus 90.9% in the ciprofloxacin group. These rates are comparable, but no statistically significant difference was observed between the groups. Few mild and self-limiting AEs were observed and the tolerability of both the drugs was also good.

CONCLUSION

The results of this randomized, open-labeled phase IV clinical trial showed that a 7-day course of cefpodoxime is therapeutically comparable to ciprofloxacin in terms of both clinical effectiveness and safety for the treatment of patients with AECSOM.

摘要

目的

比较头孢泊肟酯和环丙沙星治疗慢性化脓性中耳炎急性加重(AECSOM)轻至中度病例的有效性和安全性。

材料与方法

对诊断为AECSOM的成年患者进行筛查,符合纳入标准的患者被随机分为两组,分别口服头孢泊肟酯200mg,每日两次,或环丙沙星500mg,每日两次,疗程7天。这项随机、开放标签的IV期临床试验(注册号 - CTRI/2011/10/002079)的主要结局是第14天访视时的临床成功率,次要结局是不良事件(AE)的发生率。共纳入46例患者:头孢泊肟酯组23例,环丙沙星组23例。

结果

头孢泊肟酯组的临床成功率为95.6%,环丙沙星组为90.9%。两组成功率相当,但组间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。观察到少数轻度且自限性的不良事件,两种药物的耐受性也良好。

结论

这项随机、开放标签的IV期临床试验结果表明,在治疗AECSOM患者时,7天疗程的头孢泊肟酯在临床有效性和安全性方面与环丙沙星相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db9e/3543552/255f7449e121/JPP-3-320-g002.jpg

相似文献

7
Cefpodoxime proxetil compared with amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of otitis media.
J Pediatr. 1992 Sep;121(3):459-65. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81805-0.
9
Topical vs Combination Ciprofloxacin in the Management of Discharging Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jun;8(6):KC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8038.4421. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
10
Clinical experience with cefpodoxime proxetil in acute otitis media.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995 Apr;14(4 Suppl):S12-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199504001-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013052.pub3.
2
Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013053.pub3.
3
Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013056.pub3.
4
Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD013052. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013052.pub2.
5
Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 9;2(2):CD013053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013053.pub2.
6
Topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 6;1(1):CD013055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013055.pub2.
7
Antibiotics versus topical antiseptics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 6;1(1):CD013056. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013056.pub2.
8
Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 2;1(1):CD013051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013051.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Chronic suppurative otitis media: a review.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Jan;70(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.08.021. Epub 2005 Sep 27.
2
Five-day cefdinir course vs. ten-day cefprozil course for treatment of acute otitis media.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Dec;19(12 Suppl):S147-52. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200012001-00003.
3
Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management.
Lancet. 2000 Oct 7;356(9237):1255-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9.
4
Treatment of chronic suppurative otitis media with topical ciprofloxacin.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1998 Oct;107(10 Pt 1):865-71. doi: 10.1177/000348949810701010.
7
Antimicrobial therapy for chronic suppurative otitis media.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1981 May-Jun;90(3 Pt 3):58-62. doi: 10.1177/00034894810903s214.
10
Bacteriology of otitis media in Ghana.
Trop Doct. 1987 Apr;17(2):91-2. doi: 10.1177/004947558701700216.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验