Suppr超能文献

BRAF V600E 突变检测方法的比较:vemurafenib 伴随诊断检测的上市前验证研究。

Comparison of testing methods for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in malignant melanoma: pre-approval validation study of the companion diagnostic test for vemurafenib.

机构信息

Laboratorio de Dianas Terapéuticas, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053733. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test is a CE-marked and FDA-approved in vitro diagnostic assay used to select patients with metastatic melanoma for treatment with the selective BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. We describe the pre-approval validation of this test in two external laboratories.

METHODS

Melanoma specimens were tested for BRAF V600 mutations at two laboratories with the: cobas BRAF Mutation Test; ABI BRAF test; and bidirectional direct sequencing. Positive (PPA) and negative (NPA) percent agreements were determined between the cobas test and the other assays. Specimens with discordant results were tested with massively parallel pyrosequencing (454). DNA blends with 5% mutant alleles were tested to assess detection rates.

RESULTS

Invalid results were observed in 8/116 specimens (6·9%) with Sanger, 10/116 (8·6%) with ABI BRAF, and 0/232 (0%) with the cobas BRAF test. PPA was 97·7% for V600E mutation for the cobas BRAF test and Sanger, and NPA was 95·3%. For the cobas BRAF test and ABI BRAF, PPA was 71·9% and NPA 83·7%. For 16 cobas BRAF test-negative/ABI BRAF-positive specimens, 454 sequencing detected no codon 600 mutations in 12 and variant codon 600 mutations in four. For eight cobas BRAF test-positive/ABI BRAF-negative specimens, four were V600E and four V600K by 454 sequencing. Detection rates for 5% mutation blends were 100% for the cobas BRAF test, 33% for Sanger, and 21% for the ABI BRAF. Reproducibility of the cobas BRAF test was 111/116 (96%) between the two sites.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to evaluate potential companion diagnostic tests in external laboratories simultaneously to the pivotal clinical trial validation. The health authority approved assay had substantially better performance characteristics than the two other methods. The overall success of the cobas BRAF test is a proof of concept for future biomarker development.

摘要

背景

cobas 4800 BRAF V600 突变检测是一种获得 CE 标志和美国 FDA 批准的体外诊断检测方法,用于选择转移性黑色素瘤患者接受选择性 BRAF 抑制剂 vemurafenib 的治疗。我们在两个外部实验室中描述了该检测方法的上市前验证。

方法

在两个实验室中使用 cobas BRAF 突变检测、ABI BRAF 检测和双向直接测序检测黑色素瘤标本的 BRAF V600 突变。cobas 检测与其他检测方法之间的阳性(PPA)和阴性(NPA)一致性百分比确定。对结果不一致的标本进行大规模平行焦磷酸测序(454)检测。检测 5%突变等位基因的 DNA 混合物以评估检测率。

结果

Sanger 法检测到 116 个标本中有 8 个(6.9%)、ABI BRAF 法检测到 116 个标本中有 10 个(8.6%)、cobas BRAF 法检测到 0 个(0%)出现无效结果。cobas BRAF 检测和 Sanger 法检测 V600E 突变的 PPA 为 97.7%,NPA 为 95.3%。cobas BRAF 检测和 ABI BRAF 法检测的 PPA 为 71.9%,NPA 为 83.7%。16 个 cobas BRAF 检测阴性/ABI BRAF 阳性标本中,454 测序未检测到 12 个标本中的密码子 600 突变,4 个标本中检测到密码子 600 变体突变。8 个 cobas BRAF 检测阳性/ABI BRAF 阴性标本中,454 测序检测到 4 个为 V600E,4 个为 V600K。cobas BRAF 检测对 5%突变混合物的检测率为 100%,Sanger 法为 33%,ABI BRAF 法为 21%。两个检测点之间 cobas BRAF 检测的重复性为 116 个标本中有 111 个(96%)。

结论

同时在外部实验室中评估潜在的伴随诊断检测方法是可行的,这与关键的临床试验验证同时进行。获得卫生当局批准的检测方法比其他两种方法具有更好的性能特征。cobas BRAF 检测的整体成功是未来生物标志物开发的一个概念验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c009/3542342/c357583a8aa0/pone.0053733.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验