Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1065, USA.
Mol Pharm. 2013 Mar 4;10(3):958-66. doi: 10.1021/mp300410n. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
The purpose of this study was to investigate labetalol as a potential high permeability reference standard for the application of Biopharmaceutics Classification Systems (BCS). Permeabilities of labetalol and metoprolol were investigated in animal intestinal perfusion models and Caco-2 cell monolayers. After isolating specific intestinal segments, in situ single-pass intestinal perfusions (SPIP) were performed in rats and mice. The effective permeabilities (Peff) of labetalol and metoprolol, an FDA standard for the low/high Peff class boundary, were investigated in two different segments of rat intestine (proximal jejunum and distal ileum) and in the proximal jejunum of mouse. No significant difference was found between Peff of metoprolol and labetalol in the jejunum and ileum of rat (0.33 ± 0.11 × 10(-4) vs 0.38 ± 0.06 × 10(-4) and 0.57 ± 0.17 × 10(-4) vs 0.64 ± 0.30 × 10(-4) cm/s, respectively) and in the jejunum of mouse (0.55 ± 0.05 × 10(-4) vs 0.59 ± 0.13 × 10(-4) cm/s). However, Peff of metoprolol and labetalol were 1.7 and 1.6 times higher in the jejunum of mouse, compared to the jejunum of rat, respectively. Metoprolol and labetalol showed segmental-dependent permeability through the rat intestine, with increased Peff in the distal ileum in comparison to the proximal jejunum. Most significantly, Peff of labetalol was found to be concentration-dependent. Decreasing concentrations of labetalol in the perfusate resulted in decreased Peff compared to Peff of metoprolol. The intestinal epithelial permeability of labetalol was lower than that of metoprolol in Caco-2 cells at both apical pH 6.5 and 7.5 (5.96 ± 1.96 × 10(-6) vs 9.44 ± 3.44 × 10(-6) and 15.9 ± 2.2 × 10(-6) vs 23.2 ± 7.1 × 10(-6) cm/s, respectively). Labetalol exhibited higher permeability in basolateral to apical (BL-AP) compared to AP-BL direction in Caco-2 cells at 0.1 times the highest dose strength (HDS) (46.7 ± 6.5 × 10(-6) vs 14.2 ± 1.5 × 10(-6) cm/s). The P-gp inhibitor, verapamil, significantly increased AP-BL and decreased BL-AP direction transport of labetalol. Overall, labetalol showed high Peff in rat and mouse intestinal perfusion models similar to metoprolol at a concentration based on HDS. However, the concentration-dependent permeability of labetalol in mice due to P-gp and the inhibition study with verapamil in Caco-2 cells indicated that labetalol is not an ideal reference standard for BCS classification.
本研究旨在探讨拉贝洛尔作为生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)应用的潜在高通透性参考标准。在动物肠灌注模型和 Caco-2 细胞单层中研究了拉贝洛尔和美托洛尔的通透性。在分离特定肠段后,在大鼠和小鼠中进行了原位单次肠灌注(SPIP)。研究了 FDA 低/高 Peff 类边界标准的美托洛尔和拉贝洛尔在大鼠的两个不同肠段(空肠近端和回肠远端)和小鼠的空肠近端中的有效渗透率(Peff)。在大鼠的空肠和回肠中,美托洛尔和拉贝洛尔的 Peff 没有显著差异(0.33±0.11×10(-4)对 0.38±0.06×10(-4)和 0.57±0.17×10(-4)对 0.64±0.30×10(-4)cm/s,分别)和在小鼠的空肠中(0.55±0.05×10(-4)对 0.59±0.13×10(-4)cm/s)。然而,与大鼠空肠相比,美托洛尔和拉贝洛尔在小鼠空肠中的 Peff 分别高 1.7 倍和 1.6 倍。美托洛尔和拉贝洛尔在大鼠肠道中显示出分段依赖性通透性,与空肠近端相比,回肠远端的 Peff 增加。最重要的是,拉贝洛尔的 Peff 呈浓度依赖性。与美托洛尔相比,灌流液中拉贝洛尔浓度降低导致 Peff 降低。在 Caco-2 细胞中,拉贝洛尔的肠上皮通透性低于美托洛尔,在顶侧 pH 值为 6.5 和 7.5 时分别为 5.96±1.96×10(-6)对 9.44±3.44×10(-6)和 15.9±2.2×10(-6)对 23.2±7.1×10(-6)cm/s)。与顶侧至基底外侧(BL-AP)相比,拉贝洛尔在 Caco-2 细胞中以最高剂量强度(HDS)的 0.1 倍时表现出更高的 BL-AP 通透性(46.7±6.5×10(-6)对 14.2±1.5×10(-6)cm/s)。P-糖蛋白抑制剂维拉帕米显著增加了拉贝洛尔的 AP-BL 和减少了 BL-AP 方向的转运。总体而言,拉贝洛尔在大鼠和小鼠肠灌注模型中的 Peff 与美托洛尔相似,基于 HDS 的浓度较高。然而,由于 P-糖蛋白,拉贝洛尔在小鼠中的浓度依赖性通透性以及维拉帕米在 Caco-2 细胞中的抑制研究表明,拉贝洛尔不是 BCS 分类的理想参考标准。