Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jan;109(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60010-4.
Clinical studies on implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses have focused on biological outcomes. An assessment of the effect of prostheses on patients' quality of life (QOL) by using specific questionnaires developed for this patient population provides important information on treatment outcomes from the patients' perspectives.
The purpose of this study was to report patient-based outcomes of implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses and to evaluate the effect of implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses on QOL of participants in a prospective study.
Eighty-two participants were treated with implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses. Participants were divided into 2 groups: a retrospective group (participants treated and under care) and a prospective group (participants willing to be treated). The posttreatment patient satisfaction scores for each question were statistically analyzed by 2-way ANOVA with variables of defect type and retention type. The Student-Newman-Keuls test was used to determine any significant differences among the groups. In the prospective group, mean scores before and after prosthetic treatment were compared with the paired t test (α=.05).
The details of 54 retrospective and 28 prospective participants were reviewed. The posttreatment results of 82 patients showed that patient satisfaction with implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses was significantly different for cleaning the prostheses and recommending treatment to other people, depending on the defect and retention type. In the prospective group, participants reported significant increases in satisfaction for all questions.
Implant-retained prostheses were considered highly satisfactory, indicating good QOL for patients with maxillofacial defects. A comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment assessments revealed that implant-retained maxillofacial prostheses increased patient QOL.
临床研究主要集中在种植体支持的颌面赝复体的生物学结果上。使用针对特定患者群体开发的特定问卷评估假体对患者生活质量(QOL)的影响,可从患者角度提供有关治疗结果的重要信息。
本研究旨在报告种植体支持的颌面赝复体的患者报告结果,并评估前瞻性研究中种植体支持的颌面赝复体对参与者生活质量的影响。
82 名参与者接受了种植体支持的颌面赝复体治疗。参与者分为两组:回顾性组(接受治疗和护理的参与者)和前瞻性组(愿意接受治疗的参与者)。通过双向方差分析,以缺陷类型和保留类型为变量,对每个问题的治疗后患者满意度评分进行统计学分析。使用 Student-Newman-Keuls 检验确定组间是否存在任何显著差异。在前瞻性组中,使用配对 t 检验比较治疗前后的平均评分(α=.05)。
回顾性组 54 名和前瞻性组 28 名参与者的详细信息进行了回顾。82 名患者的治疗后结果显示,根据缺陷和保留类型,患者对种植体支持的颌面赝复体的满意度在清洁假体和向他人推荐治疗方面存在显著差异。在前瞻性组中,参与者报告所有问题的满意度均显著增加。
种植体支持的假体被认为非常令人满意,表明颌面缺损患者的生活质量良好。治疗前和治疗后的评估比较表明,种植体支持的颌面赝复体提高了患者的生活质量。