ATC, Keller Army Community Hospital, West Point, NY 10996, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):582-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546512472330. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
The use of patient-reported outcome measures to assess clinical outcomes after injury and surgery has become common in treating young athletes with orthopaedic injuries; however, normative data for these measures are limited and often include a wide range of ages and activity levels.
To provide normative data for the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in a young and athletic population, and to compare scores between participants with a history of knee ligament injury and those with no history.
Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
We administered the KOOS and WOMAC to 1177 college freshmen entering the United States Military Academy in June 2011. All participants were healthy and had been medically screened to meet the physical induction standards for military service. We calculated means, standard deviations, percentiles, ranges, and interquartile ranges for the KOOS and WOMAC by sex and injury history. We also compared median scale scores for those with a history of knee ligament injury with those with no history using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
Among the 1177 participants, 971 were male (age, 18.8 ± 0.9 years), and the remaining 206 were female (age, 18.7 ± 0.8 years). Normative median values and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for the KOOS scale scores among men with no history of knee ligament injury were the following: Symptoms (96.4; IQR, 10.7), Pain (100; IQR, 2.8), Functional Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (100; IQR, 0.0), Sports and Recreation Function (100; IQR, 5.0), and Knee-Related Quality of Life (QOL) (100; IQR, 12.5). For women with no history of knee ligament injury, the KOOS scale scores were the following: Symptoms (92.9; IQR, 14.3), Pain (100; IQR, 5.6), Functional ADL (100; IQR, 2.9), Sports and Recreation Function (100; IQR, 10.0), and Knee-Related QOL (93.8; IQR, 18.8). Among the men, 139 (14%) reported a history of knee ligament injury, while 33 (16%) women also reported a history of injury. All KOOS scale scores and the WOMAC Stiffness and Function scale scores were significantly lower (P < .05) for men who reported a history of knee ligament injury. Similarly, Symptoms, Pain, and Knee-Related QOL on the KOOS and Pain on the WOMAC were significantly lower among women with a history of knee ligament injury.
Normative values for all KOOS scales suggest a high level of functioning among participants with no history of knee ligament injury. Despite meeting the medical standards for military service, participants with a history of knee ligament injury had significantly lower KOOS and WOMAC scores upon entry to military service.
在治疗患有骨科损伤的年轻运动员时,使用患者报告的结局测量来评估损伤和手术后的临床结果已经变得很常见;然而,这些测量方法的规范数据有限,并且通常包括广泛的年龄和活动水平。
为年轻且活跃的人群提供膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)和西部安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)的规范数据,并比较有膝关节韧带损伤史和无膝关节韧带损伤史的参与者之间的评分。
横断面研究;证据水平,3 级。
我们于 2011 年 6 月向进入美国军事学院的 1177 名大学新生发放了 KOOS 和 WOMAC。所有参与者均健康,并通过了医学筛查,以满足服兵役的身体入伍标准。我们按性别和损伤史计算了 KOOS 和 WOMAC 的均值、标准差、百分位数、范围和四分位间距。我们还使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较了有膝关节韧带损伤史和无膝关节韧带损伤史的参与者的中位数评分。
在 1177 名参与者中,971 名为男性(年龄 18.8±0.9 岁),其余 206 名为女性(年龄 18.7±0.8 岁)。无膝关节韧带损伤史的男性 KOOS 量表评分的中位数和四分位间距(IQR)如下:症状(96.4;IQR,10.7)、疼痛(100;IQR,2.8)、日常活动功能(ADL)(100;IQR,0.0)、运动和娱乐功能(100;IQR,5.0)和膝关节相关生活质量(QOL)(100;IQR,12.5)。无膝关节韧带损伤史的女性 KOOS 量表评分如下:症状(92.9;IQR,14.3)、疼痛(100;IQR,5.6)、ADL 功能(100;IQR,2.9)、运动和娱乐功能(100;IQR,10.0)和膝关节相关 QOL(93.8;IQR,18.8)。在男性中,有 139 名(14%)报告有膝关节韧带损伤史,而 33 名(16%)女性也报告有损伤史。所有 KOOS 量表评分和 WOMAC 僵硬和功能量表评分在报告有膝关节韧带损伤史的男性中均显著较低(P<0.05)。同样,有膝关节韧带损伤史的女性的 KOOS 中的症状、疼痛和膝关节相关 QOL 以及 WOMAC 中的疼痛也明显较低。
所有 KOOS 量表的规范值表明,无膝关节韧带损伤史的参与者的功能水平较高。尽管符合服兵役的医学标准,但有膝关节韧带损伤史的参与者在入伍时的 KOOS 和 WOMAC 评分明显较低。