Suppr超能文献

清醒犬心肌梗死及再灌注后的程控电刺激

Programmed electrical stimulation after myocardial infarction and reperfusion in conscious dogs.

作者信息

Krumpl G, Todt H, Schunder-Tatzber S, Raberger G

机构信息

Pharmakologisches Institut Universität Wien Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Methods. 1990 Apr;23(2):155-69. doi: 10.1016/0160-5402(90)90042-j.

Abstract

The hemodynamic and electrophysiologic variables and the inducibility of arrhythmias were studied before coronary artery occlusion (CAO, 4h) and on days 4, 14, and 28 of the late reperfusion phase in conscious, chronically instrumented dogs. Despite a lack of significant changes in the hemodynamic and the electrophysiologic variables, the response to programmed electrical stimulation (PES) before and after CAO with subsequent reperfusion varied substantially. Before intervention arrhythmias such as sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT) or ventricular fibrillation (VFib) could not be induced by PES via ultrasonic crystals located subendocardially (LAD and LCX region) or via common stimulation electrodes (right ventricle) in any of six instrumented animals. All six animals were inducible after CAO and reperfusion. Five animals showed SVT and one animal showed VFib in response to stimulation on days 4 and 14 of the late reperfusion phase after CAO. On day 28 four animals showed SVT, and two showed VFib. Antiarrhythmic drug testing carried out in the late reperfusion phase with lidocaine (1 mg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion) revealed 50% efficacy at a dosage of 40 micrograms/kg/min, 100% at 80 micrograms/kg/min, and 67% at 120 mu/kg/min. The persistent inducibility of arrhythmias for the entire experimental period of 24 days may be attributable to the following features of our model: 1. Electrical stimulation carried out from three different locations. 2. The use of up to three extrastimuli in the PES studies. 3. The use of conscious dogs during CAO, reperfusion, and PES. This novel experimental approach thus promises to be of clinical relevance for the investigation of new antiarrhythmic drugs.

摘要

在清醒、长期植入仪器的犬类中,研究了冠状动脉闭塞(CAO,4小时)前以及再灌注后期第4、14和28天的血流动力学和电生理变量以及心律失常的诱发性。尽管血流动力学和电生理变量缺乏显著变化,但CAO及随后再灌注前后对程序性电刺激(PES)的反应差异很大。干预前,通过心内膜下(LAD和LCX区域)的超声晶体或通过普通刺激电极(右心室)进行的PES在六只植入仪器的动物中均无法诱发出诸如持续性室性心动过速(SVT)或室颤(VFib)等心律失常。所有六只动物在CAO和再灌注后均可诱发。五只动物在CAO后再灌注后期的第4天和第14天对刺激表现出SVT,一只动物表现出VFib。在再灌注后期用利多卡因(1mg/kg推注后持续输注)进行的抗心律失常药物测试显示,剂量为40μg/kg/min时疗效为50%,80μg/kg/min时为100%,120μg/kg/min时为67%。在整个24天的实验期间心律失常的持续诱发性可能归因于我们模型的以下特点:1. 从三个不同位置进行电刺激。2. 在PES研究中使用多达三个额外刺激。3. 在CAO、再灌注和PES期间使用清醒的犬类。因此,这种新的实验方法有望在研究新型抗心律失常药物方面具有临床相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验