• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症集束化策略对中国严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响

Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china.

作者信息

Wang Zhen, Xiong Yingxia, Schorr Christa, Dellinger R P

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Beijing Shi-Ji-Tan Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.084. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.084
PMID:23332802
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is well known that poor sepsis outcomes are related to delays in diagnosis and treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the mortality rate between two groups of patients, one group presenting before and one group presenting after implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) sepsis performance improvement bundles in the Emergency Department (ED).

METHODS

This was a prospective study. The studied population included severe sepsis and septic shock patients entered in the SSC database who were admitted to the ED between June 2008 and December 2009. Patients were divided into two groups based on when they presented to the ED. Key treatment interventions, admission to the intensive care unit, and in-hospital mortality were compared. In addition, a survey was completed by the treating physicians to identify reasons for failures to comply with indicators.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-five (195) patients with severe sepsis and septic shock were enrolled in the study. Mortality was significantly higher at 44.8% in the baseline group (Group 1) compared to 31.6% in the group studied after the SSC protocol was instituted (Group 2) (p < 0.05). Compliance with all elements of the sepsis resuscitation bundle was 1% in Group 1 and 9% in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Compliance with all elements of the management bundle was 1% in Group 1 and 12.8% in Group 2. The most frequently reported reasons by physicians for failure to comply with the bundles were: "did not think it was needed" and "unsure of reason."

CONCLUSION

The results revealed a significant drop in mortality after implementing the SSC protocol and sepsis performance improvement bundles in the ED. The barriers to implementing sepsis guidelines are knowledge, attitude, and behavioral barriers.

摘要

背景

众所周知,脓毒症治疗效果不佳与诊断和治疗延误有关。

目的

本研究旨在比较两组患者的死亡率,一组是在急诊科实施“拯救脓毒症运动”(SSC)脓毒症绩效改进集束化治疗之前就诊的患者,另一组是在实施之后就诊的患者。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究。研究人群包括2008年6月至2009年12月期间入住急诊科并录入SSC数据库的严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者。根据患者到急诊科就诊的时间将其分为两组。比较关键治疗干预措施、入住重症监护病房情况和院内死亡率。此外,治疗医师完成了一项调查,以确定未遵守指标的原因。

结果

195例严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者纳入本研究。基线组(第1组)的死亡率显著更高,为44.8%,而在实施SSC方案后研究的组(第2组)中为31.6%(p<0.05)。第1组对脓毒症复苏集束化治疗所有要素的依从率为1%,第2组为9%(p<0.05)。第1组对管理集束化治疗所有要素的依从率为1%,第2组为12.8%。医师报告的最常见未遵守集束化治疗的原因是:“认为不需要”和“原因不明”。

结论

结果显示,在急诊科实施SSC方案和脓毒症绩效改进集束化治疗后死亡率显著下降。实施脓毒症指南的障碍是知识、态度和行为方面的障碍。

相似文献

1
Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china.脓毒症集束化策略对中国严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响
J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.084. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
Feasibility of introduction and implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle in a Singapore emergency department.在新加坡急诊科引入和实施《拯救脓毒症运动》捆绑包的可行性。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(5):344-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32835c2ba3.
3
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.实施一系列用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的质量指标与死亡率降低相关。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D.
4
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.脓毒性休克患儿血流动力学支持的时间和液体敏感性复苏:在发展中国家一家儿科重症监护病房实施美国危重病医学会/儿科高级生命支持指南的障碍
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a.
5
Factors influencing compliance with early resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.影响严重脓毒症和感染性休克早期复苏包管理依从性的因素。
Shock. 2012 Nov;38(5):474-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31826eea2b.
6
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项为期7.5年的研究中绩效指标与结果之间的关联
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723.
7
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
8
Effectiveness of sepsis bundle application in cirrhotic patients with septic shock: a single-center experience.肝硬化合并感染性休克患者中脓毒症集束化治疗的应用效果:单中心经验。
J Crit Care. 2013 Apr;28(2):152-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
9
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
10
[The impact of sepsis bundles on mortality in patients with sepsis shock: a prospective clinical study].[脓毒症集束化治疗对脓毒症休克患者死亡率的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Sep;20(9):534-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards the diagnosis and management of paediatric sepsis among paediatric physicians and nurses: a cross-sectional study of 21 hospitals in Hubei Province, China.儿科医生和护士对儿童脓毒症诊断和管理的知识、态度和实践:对中国湖北省 21 家医院的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 27;14(2):e079411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079411.
2
Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial.脓毒症实施方法评估:一项集群随机化混合 2 型试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 29;24(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y.
3
Analysis of the Causes and Preventive Strategies of Urogenic Sepsis after Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.
输尿管软镜碎石术后尿源性脓毒症的病因分析及预防策略
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Sep 8;2022:5332101. doi: 10.1155/2022/5332101. eCollection 2022.
4
Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.急诊脓毒症成人早期液体冲击治疗:系统评价、荟萃分析和叙述性综合。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 11;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00558-5.
5
Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.电子预警系统在住院病房患者脓毒症中的应用:一项基于阶段式楔形集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):695. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05562-5.
6
Use of a Clinical Audit System in Implementing Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines in Patients With Peritonitis.临床审计系统在实施腹膜炎患者脓毒症存活策略指南中的应用
Cureus. 2021 Jun 27;13(6):e15961. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15961.
7
Analysis of structure indicators influencing 3-h and 6-h compliance with the surviving sepsis campaign guidelines in China: a systematic review.分析影响中国遵守《拯救脓毒症运动指南》3 小时和 6 小时达标率的结构指标:系统评价。
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Mar 19;26(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00498-7.
8
Compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline 1-hour bundle for septic shock in China in 2018.2018年中国对脓毒性休克患者遵循拯救脓毒症运动1小时集束化治疗指南的情况。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(4):278. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5429.
9
Developing Adult Sepsis Protocol to Reduce the Time to Initial Antibiotic Dose and Improve Outcomes among Patients with Cancer in Emergency Department.制定成人脓毒症治疗方案以缩短首次使用抗生素的时间并改善急诊科癌症患者的治疗效果。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Sep 14;7(4):355-360. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_32_20. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
10
Correlation analysis of omega-3 fatty acids and mortality of sepsis and sepsis-induced ARDS in adults: data from previous randomized controlled trials.ω-3 脂肪酸与成人脓毒症和脓毒症相关性急性呼吸窘迫综合征死亡率的相关性分析:来自既往随机对照试验的数据。
Nutr J. 2018 May 31;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0356-8.