• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症实施方法评估:一项集群随机化混合 2 型试验研究方案。

Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Sep 29;24(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y
PMID:37773067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10543317/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and ICU death. In recognition of the burden of sepsis, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement developed sepsis "bundles" (goals to accomplish over a specific time period) to facilitate SSC guideline implementation in clinical practice. Using the SSC 3-h bundle as a base, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a 3-h sepsis bundle that has become the national standard for early management of sepsis. Emerging observational data, from an analysis conducted for the AIMS grant application, suggest there may be additional mortality benefit from even earlier implementation of the 3-h bundle, i.e., the 1-h bundle.

METHOD

The primary aims of this randomized controlled trial are to: (1) examine the effect on clinical outcomes of Emergency Department initiation of the elements of the 3-h bundle within the traditional 3 h versus initiating within 1 h of sepsis recognition and (2) examine the extent to which a rigorous implementation strategy will improve implementation and compliance with both the 1-h bundle and the 3-h bundle. This study will be entirely conducted in the Emergency Department at 18 sites. A secondary aim is to identify clinical sepsis phenotypes and their impact on treatment outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This cluster-randomized trial, employing implementation science methodology, is timely and important to the field. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation design is likely to have an impact on clinical practice in sepsis management by providing a rigorous evaluation of the 1- and 3-h bundles.

FUNDING

NHLBI R01HL162954.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05491941. Registered on August 8, 2022.

摘要

背景

脓毒症是重症监护病房(ICU)入住和 ICU 死亡的主要原因。为了认识到脓毒症的负担,拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)和医疗保健改进研究所制定了脓毒症“捆绑包”(在特定时间段内完成的目标),以促进 SSC 指南在临床实践中的实施。以 SSC 3 小时捆绑包为基础,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心制定了一个 3 小时脓毒症捆绑包,该捆绑包已成为脓毒症早期管理的国家标准。来自 AIMS 资助申请分析的新观察数据表明,更早地实施 3 小时捆绑包(即 1 小时捆绑包)可能会带来更多的死亡率益处。

方法

这项随机对照试验的主要目的是:(1)检查在急诊科,与传统的 3 小时内开始实施 3 小时捆绑包的各个元素相比,在识别脓毒症后 1 小时内开始实施这些元素对临床结果的影响;(2)检查严格的实施策略将如何提高对 1 小时捆绑包和 3 小时捆绑包的实施和遵守程度。这项研究将完全在 18 个地点的急诊科进行。次要目标是确定临床脓毒症表型及其对治疗结果的影响。

讨论

这项采用实施科学方法的聚类随机试验,对该领域来说是及时和重要的。混合有效性-实施设计很可能通过对 1 小时和 3 小时捆绑包进行严格评估,对脓毒症管理的临床实践产生影响。

资助

NHLBI R01HL162954。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05491941。于 2022 年 8 月 8 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f5/10543317/97820933de2d/13063_2023_7644_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f5/10543317/f9232860de99/13063_2023_7644_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f5/10543317/97820933de2d/13063_2023_7644_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f5/10543317/f9232860de99/13063_2023_7644_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f5/10543317/97820933de2d/13063_2023_7644_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial.脓毒症实施方法评估:一项集群随机化混合 2 型试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 29;24(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y.
2
Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.实施《拯救脓毒症运动指南》。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017 Oct;23(5):412-416. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000438.
3
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项为期7.5年的研究中绩效指标与结果之间的关联
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723.
4
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项长达 7.5 年的研究中,绩效指标与结局之间的关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1623-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3496-0. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
5
Early sepsis care with the National Early Warning Score 2-guided Sepsis Hour-1 Bundle in the emergency department: hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pilot stepped wedge randomised controlled trial (NEWS-1 TRIPS) protocol.急诊科应用国家早期预警评分 2 指导的脓毒症 1 小时bundle 进行早期脓毒症护理:混合 1 型有效性实施试点阶梯式随机对照试验(NEWS-1 TRIPS)方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):e080676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080676.
6
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
7
Relationship between time of emergency department admission and adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle in patients with septic shock.急诊就诊时间与脓毒性休克患者遵守拯救脓毒症运动捆绑治疗的关系。
Crit Care. 2022 Feb 11;26(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03899-0.
8
Impact of sepsis bundle strategy on outcomes of patients suffering from severe sepsis and septic shock in china.脓毒症集束化策略对中国严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响
J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.084. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
9
Mortality rate among patients with septic shock after implementation of 6-hour sepsis protocol in the emergency department of Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院急诊科实施6小时脓毒症治疗方案后脓毒性休克患者的死亡率
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Aug;97 Suppl 8:S182-93.
10
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators Affecting the Implementation of the Sepsis Six Protocol by Nurses in Acute Care Settings in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.约旦急性护理环境中护士实施脓毒症六步法方案的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jul 20;11:23779608251362276. doi: 10.1177/23779608251362276. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
What Can We Learn from Differences in Hospitals' Sepsis Care?我们能从医院脓毒症护理的差异中学到什么?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr;211(4):546-547. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202501-0106ED.
3
Clinical subtypes in critically ill patients with sepsis: validation and parsimonious classifier model development.

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
2
Promoting Family Engagement in the ICU: Experience From a National Collaborative of 63 ICUs.促进 ICU 中的家庭参与:来自 63 家 ICU 国家协作的经验。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):1692-1698. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004009.
3
Using formative evaluation methods to improve clinical implementation efforts: Description and an example.
脓毒症重症患者的临床亚型:验证与简约分类器模型开发
Crit Care. 2025 Feb 4;29(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05256-3.
4
The Predictors of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Applying Sepsis Six Guidelines Among Critical Care Nurses.重症监护护士应用脓毒症六项指南时感知到的障碍和促进因素的预测因素
Cureus. 2024 Mar 31;16(3):e57355. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57355. eCollection 2024 Mar.
运用形成性评价方法提高临床实施效果:描述与实例
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112532. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112532. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
4
Derivation, Validation, and Potential Treatment Implications of Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Sepsis.新型败血症临床表型的推导、验证及潜在治疗意义。
JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):2003-2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5791.
5
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Implementation science: What is it and why should I care?实施科学:它是什么,为什么我应该关心?
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112376. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
7
Innovations in Mixed Methods Evaluations.混合方法评估的创新。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:423-442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044215. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
8
Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.系统评价探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 5;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6.
9
National Performance on the Medicare SEP-1 Sepsis Quality Measure.国家在 Medicare SEP-1 脓毒症质量测量上的表现。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1026-1032. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003613.
10
Caring for Critically Ill Patients with the ABCDEF Bundle: Results of the ICU Liberation Collaborative in Over 15,000 Adults.用 ABCDEF 集束化方案关爱危重症患者:15000 多例成人患者的 ICU 解放协作研究结果。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):3-14. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003482.