Suppr超能文献

急性大脑中动脉闭塞:血管内再通治疗作用的再评价。

Acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: reappraisal of the role of endovascular revascularization.

机构信息

Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiology, Hadassah - Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2013 Feb;8(2):109-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00898.x.

Abstract

Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator was the first successful stroke therapy in acute ischaemic stroke, after innumerable failed attempts at neuroprotection and neurorestoration. However, intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator has been shown to be effective in recanalizing middle cerebral artery occlusions in only about one-third of cases. The natural history of untreated acute middle cerebral artery occlusion is poor, leading to long-term disability in >70% and mortality in 20%. Recanalization alone is not the name of the game. Only timely, very rapid recanalization, achieved within minutes or at most a few hours after stroke has occurred, before irreversible brain damage develops, is effective. Is intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator the best available option we have for these patients? With recently introduced stent-based thrombectomy devices, neurointerventionalists have achieved complete recanalization rates of more than 90% in middle cerebral artery and 'T' occlusions, with a mean procedural recanalization time of less than one-hour and negligible complication rates. More than 80% of patients less than 80 years of age who were treated within eight-hours after stroke onset in our centre achieved a modified Rankin score of 0-2 at three-month follow-up. The site of arterial occlusion is a factor driving the choice between a standard intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator protocol and an alternative intervention such as intravenous and/or mechanical thrombolysis to achieve early recanalization. The role of intravenous tissue type plasminogen activator must be redefined in major occlusions, and the indications for endovascular therapy must also be reappraised.

摘要

静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活物是急性缺血性脑卒中后第一种成功的治疗方法,在此之前,无数神经保护和神经修复的尝试都以失败告终。然而,静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活物仅能使大约三分之一的大脑中动脉闭塞患者血管再通。未经治疗的急性大脑中动脉闭塞的自然病程较差,导致超过 70%的患者长期残疾,20%的患者死亡。单纯血管再通并不是治疗的目的。只有在发生卒中后几分钟内或最多数小时内实现及时、非常迅速的再通,在不可逆脑损伤发生之前实现再通,才是有效的。静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活物是这些患者目前可用的最佳选择吗?随着最近引入的基于支架的血栓切除术装置,神经介入医生在大脑中动脉和“T”型闭塞的完全再通率超过 90%,平均手术再通时间不到一小时,并发症发生率可忽略不计。在我们中心,80%以下的年龄在 80 岁以下的患者在卒中发作后 8 小时内接受治疗,在 3 个月的随访中,改良 Rankin 评分为 0-2。动脉闭塞的部位是选择标准静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活物方案与替代干预措施(如静脉内和/或机械溶栓以实现早期再通)的驱动因素。在大血管闭塞中,必须重新定义静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活物的作用,血管内治疗的适应证也必须重新评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验