外科实习评估促进专业精神的提升。
Surgery clerkship evaluations drive improved professionalism.
机构信息
Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
出版信息
J Surg Educ. 2013 Jan-Feb;70(1):149-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
PURPOSE
To determine whether a brief student survey can differentiate among third-year clerkship student's professionalism experiences and whether sharing specific feedback with surgery faculty and residents can lead to improvements.
METHODS
Medical students completed a survey on professionalism at the conclusion of each third-year clerkship specialty rotation during academic years 2007-2010.
RESULTS
Comparisons of survey items in 2007-2008 revealed significantly lower ratings for the surgery clerkship on both Excellence (F = 10.75, p < 0.001) and Altruism/Respect (F = 15.59, p < 0.001) subscales. These data were shared with clerkship directors, prompting the surgery department to discuss student perceptions of professionalism with faculty and residents. Postmeeting ratings of surgery professionalism significantly improved on both Excellence and Altruism/Respect dimensions (p < 0.005 for each).
CONCLUSIONS
A brief survey can be used to measure student perceptions of professionalism and an intervention as simple as a surgery department openly sharing results and communicating expectations appears to drive positive change in student experiences.
目的
确定简短的学生调查是否可以区分三年级实习学生的专业经验，以及与外科教员和住院医生分享具体反馈是否可以带来改进。
方法
在 2007 年至 2010 年的学术年间，医学生在完成每一个三年级实习专业轮转后完成了一份关于专业精神的调查。
结果
2007-2008 年的调查项目比较显示，在卓越（F=10.75，p<0.001）和利他主义/尊重（F=15.59，p<0.001）子量表上，外科实习的评分明显较低。这些数据与实习主任分享，促使外科部门与教员和住院医生讨论学生对专业精神的看法。会议后的外科专业精神评分在卓越和利他主义/尊重维度上都显著提高（每次 p<0.005）。
结论
简短的调查可以用来衡量学生对专业精神的看法，而像外科部门公开分享结果和传达期望这样简单的干预措施似乎可以推动学生体验的积极变化。
Zotero 插件