Suppr超能文献

外科实习期间的实习中期反馈:利用学习者自我评估的“专业素养、报告、解读、管理、教育及操作技能”应用

Midclerkship feedback in the surgical clerkship: the "Professionalism, Reporting, Interpreting, Managing, Educating, and Procedural Skills" application utilizing learner self-assessment.

作者信息

Hochberg Mark, Berman Russell, Ogilvie Jennifer, Yingling Sandra, Lee Sabrina, Pusic Martin, Pachter H Leon

机构信息

New York University Department of Surgery and the New York University Office of Medical Education, New York, NY, USA.

New York University Department of Surgery and the New York University Office of Medical Education, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2017 Feb;213(2):212-216. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Liaison Committee on Medical Education requires midclerkship formative (low stakes) feedback to students regarding their clinical skills. Student self-assessment is not commonly incorporated into this evaluation. We sought to determine the feasibility of collecting and comparing student self-assessment with that of their preceptors using an iPad application. These student self-ratings and preceptor ratings are jointly created and reviewed as part of a face-to-face midclerkship feedback session.

METHODS

Using our iPad application for Professionalism, Reporting, Interpreting, Managing, Educating, and Procedural Skills ("PRIMES"), students answer 6 questions based on their self-assessment of performance at midclerkship. Each skill is rated on a 3-point scale (beginning, competent, and strong) with specific behavioral anchors. The faculty preceptors then complete the same PRIMES form during the face-to-face meeting. The application displays a comparison of the 2 sets of ratings, facilitating a discussion to determine individualized learning objectives for the second half of the clerkship.

RESULTS

A total of 209 student-preceptor pairs completed PRIMES ratings. On average, student-preceptor ratings were in agreement for 38% of the time. Agreement between students and preceptors was highest for Professionalism (70%) and lowest for Procedural Skills (22%). On average, 60% of student-preceptor ratings did not agree. Students rated themselves lower than preceptors 52% of the time, while only 8% of students rated themselves higher than their preceptors' ratings (this difference is significant at the P value <.05 level).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the value of using the PRIMES framework to incorporate surgery clerkship students' self-assessment into formative face-to-face midclerkship feedback sessions with their preceptors with the goal to improve performance during the second half of the clerkship.

摘要

背景

医学教育联络委员会要求在实习中期对学生的临床技能进行形成性(低风险)反馈。学生自我评估通常未纳入该评估中。我们试图确定使用iPad应用程序收集并比较学生自我评估与带教老师评估的可行性。这些学生自评和带教老师评分是在面对面的实习中期反馈会议中共同生成并审核的。

方法

使用我们的iPad应用程序“专业精神、报告、解读、管理、教育及操作技能”(“PRIMES”),学生根据对实习中期表现的自我评估回答6个问题。每项技能按3分制(初级、胜任、优秀)评分,并配有具体行为锚定。带教老师随后在面对面会议期间完成相同的PRIMES表格。该应用程序会显示两组评分的比较结果,便于进行讨论以确定实习后半段的个性化学习目标。

结果

共有209对学生 - 带教老师完成了PRIMES评分。平均而言,学生和带教老师的评分有38%的时间一致。学生和带教老师在专业精神方面的一致性最高(70%),在操作技能方面最低(22%)。平均而言,60%的学生 - 带教老师评分不一致。52%的时间里学生给自己的评分低于带教老师,而只有8%的学生给自己的评分高于带教老师的评分(在P值<.05水平上,这种差异具有统计学意义)。

结论

本研究证明了使用PRIMES框架将外科实习学生的自我评估纳入与带教老师面对面的实习中期形成性反馈会议的价值,目的是提高实习后半段的表现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验