Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code BICC, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):179-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00590.
In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force determined that evidence was insufficient to recommend behavioral interventions and counseling to prevent child abuse and neglect.
To review new evidence on the effectiveness of behavioral interventions and counseling in health care settings for reducing child abuse and neglect and related health outcomes, as well as adverse effects of interventions.
MEDLINE and PsycINFO (January 2002 to June 2012), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (through the second quarter of 2012), Scopus, and reference lists.
English-language trials of the effectiveness of behavioral interventions and counseling and studies of any design about adverse effects.
Investigators extracted data about study populations, designs, and outcomes and rated study quality using established criteria.
Eleven fair-quality randomized trials of interventions and no studies of adverse effects met inclusion criteria. A trial of risk assessment and interventions for abuse and neglect in pediatric clinics for families with children aged 5 years or younger indicated reduced physical assault, Child Protective Services (CPS) reports, nonadherence to medical care, and immunization delay among screened children. Ten trials of early childhood home visitation reported reduced CPS reports, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and self-reports of abuse and improved adherence to immunizations and well-child care, although results were inconsistent.
Trials were limited by heterogeneity, low adherence, high loss to follow-up, and lack of standardized measures.
Risk assessment and behavioral interventions in pediatric clinics reduced abuse and neglect outcomes for young children. Early childhood home visitation also reduced abuse and neglect, but results were inconsistent. Additional research on interventions to prevent child abuse and neglect is needed.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
2004 年,美国预防服务工作组确定,没有足够的证据推荐在医疗保健环境中采取行为干预和咨询措施来预防儿童虐待和忽视。
综述新的证据,评估在医疗保健环境中采取行为干预和咨询措施减少儿童虐待和忽视及其相关健康结局的效果,以及干预措施的不良影响。
MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO(2002 年 1 月至 2012 年 6 月)、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库(2012 年第二季度)、Scopus 和参考文献列表。
英语撰写的行为干预和咨询措施有效性的试验,以及任何设计的关于不良影响的研究。
研究者提取了关于研究人群、设计和结局的数据,并使用既定标准评估研究质量。
11 项质量尚可的干预措施随机试验和无不良影响研究符合纳入标准。一项在儿科诊所对有 5 岁或 5 岁以下儿童的家庭进行的虐待和忽视风险评估和干预措施的试验显示,接受筛查的儿童中身体攻击、儿童保护服务(CPS)报告、不遵医嘱和免疫接种延迟的情况减少。10 项早期儿童家庭探访试验报告称 CPS 报告、急诊就诊、住院和自我报告的虐待减少,以及免疫接种和常规儿童保健的遵医嘱情况改善,尽管结果不一致。
试验受到异质性、低依从性、高失访率和缺乏标准化测量的限制。
儿科诊所的风险评估和行为干预减少了幼儿虐待和忽视结局。早期儿童家庭探访也减少了虐待和忽视,但结果不一致。需要进一步研究预防儿童虐待和忽视的干预措施。
美国医疗保健研究与质量局。